Archive for the 'U.S. Senate' Category

Y tu, Elaine? Vencor bites back at Mitch

Joe Sonka August 8th, 2008

(crossposted at Barefoot and Progressive)

We all expected Mitch McConnell to make Vencor an issue his campaign against Bruce Lunsford, but he should have known this was coming. Throwing Vencor at Bruce necessitates also throwing his wife, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao, under the bus.

Elaine Chao was on the Vencor Board of Directors during its period of turmoil, and as Lusford CD Cary Stemle said today, she was an active member of the board as it made unanimous decisions during this period.

Also of note is that Mitch McConnell played a key role in that time in the Senate when nursing homes around the country were going under because of the draconian cuts in Medicare.

If Mitch is really intent on going down this road, he better watch his back, because the road heads right back to the McConnell family, as well.

OVERRIDE!!! (despite fringe extremist Mitch McConnell)

Joe Sonka July 17th, 2008

(crossposted at Barefoot and Progressive)

Some Republicans actually grew a heart today, cutting the unholy umbilical chord that attached themselves to President Bush, and voting to override his veto of the “Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act”. This bill prevents a 10.6% cut in pay for doctors under Medicare, as explained here.

But here’s the least shocking news, ever: Mitch McConnell once again voted with Bush and the extreme right-wing fringe in a losing effort.

Just how much of an extremist has McConnell showed himself to be? Take a look at how the Congressional representatives of KY voted. While Reverend Ron Lewis voted against the veto override, look who voted for it: Geoff(erson) Davis, Exxon Ed Whitfield, and Hal Rogers.

That’s right. Mitch McConnell is such a fringe extremist that he is too the RIGHT of Davis, Whitfield and Rogers.

We are in for a tidal wave election this November, and fringe, extremists Republicans like Mitch McConnell are going to be swept away into political oblivion.

Beaker, from Muppet Show
Beaker, from Muppet Show

It’s Been A Long Time Coming

Terri Whitehouse June 5th, 2008

Reading more national coverage about the posts below, it is clear that it’s not just us Kentuckians that are sick and tired of Sen. Mitch McConnell and his shenanigans. So I’d like to issue a little challenge for those of us who truly want to Ditch Mitch this November.

For every minute (~ 510) that it took a clerk to read the bipartisan climate change bill aloud, I’d like to urge you to to donate to campaign of Bruce Lunsford. At a rate of penny per minute, that would total a mere $5.10 donation. A nickel per minute would total $25.50. You get the picture. I know it’s not a great deal of money. But I think it would be a powerful gesture, regardless.

The people of Kentucky and of America are not pawns in Mitch McConnell’s political power games, and before we hit him at the polls, we must hit him where it *really* hurts - his pockets. The government’s business should never be political strategy. Not on my dollar. Not on my penny.

If you agree with me, please repost this blog entry wherever you think it may be welcome, and urge like-minded people to do the same. When a person such as Mitch McConnell makes it so crystal-clear that he has zero interest in representing the people of the Commonwealth, then we have no choice but to elect a person who does. And that person is Bruce Lunsford.

UPDATE: You can also sign up to volunteer for Lunsford’s campaign here. DO IT!

Last Minute: Democratic Senatorial Debate!

Terri Whitehouse March 11th, 2008

Via Page One comes news that the Metro Dems will host a debate tomorrow. Mark Hebert will moderate the debate between candidates Greg Fischer and Mike Cassaro. Bruce Lunsford will not be in attendance.

The debate will be held at the UAW Union Hall at 6:30 P.M. If you go, please consider this topic an open thread to discuss what you saw and heard there, as I won’t be able to make it due to my work schedule.

The Early Bird Gets the Turd

Terri Whitehouse February 7th, 2008

Sometimes, I wonder why I don’t just stick cotton in my ears every morning:

The Army blocked help for wounded vets and then lied about it.

Sen. Mitch McConnell and his ilk stopped legislation that would actually help people in this dear-God-whatever-you-do-don’t-call-it-a-recession.

We’re paying more and getting less for our national defense.

The Historic Obstruction of Senator McFilibuster

Joe Sonka December 4th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots and DailyKos, go recommend it!)

Mitch McConnell is currently employing the most cynical and selfish of tactics within the Senate. Mitch finds himself faced with a minority in the House and Senate, where much progressive legislation has passed in the House and been supported by 50+% in the Senate.

But this would certainly make Democrats look good, as they promised to raise the minimum wage, expand health care and shift course in Iraq. And they have had the votes to pass such legislation.

So what's Mitch McConnell's strategy? Block everything. Filibuster everything. And then, accuse Democrats as being a "do-nothing" Congress. Then, hope that the American people are stupid enough not to realize that it is the Republicans that are blocking legislation from passing. The strategy was laid out in public by Trent Lott when he said, "The strategy of being obstructionist can work or fail … and so far it’s working for us." Working for the American people is a far different matter.

And these filibusters have come at a record-shattering pace. In July, the 110th Senate was already on pace to almost triple the record number of filibusters, as you can see in this handy little graphic: (and an incredibly thorough run down here)


And they're still on pace to shatter this record. From the New York Times, we learn that Mitch and his Republican buddies continue to obstruct on an unprecedented level:

So far in this first year of the 110th Congress, there have been 72 motions to stop filibusters, most on the Iraq war but also on routine issues like reauthorizing Amtrak funding. There were 68 such motions in the full two years of the previous Congress, 53 in 1987-88 and 23 in 1977-78. In 1967-68, there were 5 such votes, one of them on a plan to amend cloture itself, which failed.

For policy making, this is the legislative equivalent of gum on a shoe.

It has produced a numbing cycle of Washington futility: House Democrats pass a bill, but Senate Democrats, facing a filibuster by the Republican minority, fail to get the 60 votes needed to end debate. Little wonder that approval ratings of Congress stink these days.

But is this strategy working for McConnell? Are the American people duped by this obstruct and blame strategy?

While it is true that Congress' approvals are abysmal, a look at the numbers shows that Americans are not blaming the Democrats at this point. A recent USA Today/Gallup showed that 54% have a favorable view of Democrats, 37% unfavorable. The Republicans? 40% approve, 50% disapprove. And a recent Washington Post/ABC polled showed similar numbers as the Democrats had a 51% favorable rating to the Republicans 39%.

Want further proof that this cynical strategy is not working? Take a look at Mitch McConnell's plummeting approval ratings, which are an all-time low of 44/47%. Furthermore, his numbers among moderates and Independents in KY are particularly god-awful and continuing a steep downward spiral. People are sick of McConnell's allegiance to Bush and his corrupt party.

But Mitch and his Republican friends in the Senate are going to stick by this strategy: 1.) Block every piece of popular legislation which will help our country move forward. 2.) Blame Democrats for nothing passing and "doing nothing". Forget the negative consequences of blocking such important legislation, just think about driving down Democrats' approvals by dishonestly blaming them.

Too bad for them, people aren't getting fooled and Republicans will have no shelter when the great Democratic tidal wave of 2008 hits. 

Especially the "Grim Reaper" of the Senate. 

Sen. Mitch McConnell and GOP Supporting Our Troops

Terri Whitehouse September 20th, 2007

As you likely already know, the Webb amendment was “passed” by a vote of 56-44:

Webb’s legislation would have required that troops spend as much time at home training with their units as they spend deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan. Members of the National Guard or Reserve would be guaranteed three years at home before being sent back.

Most Army soldiers now spend about 15 months in combat with 12 months home.

“In blocking this bipartisan bill, Republicans have once again demonstrated that they are more committed to protecting the president than protecting our troops,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

Regarding his leadership in blocking the amendment, Sen. McConnell issued the following press release:

All of us agree that our forces must be rested, trained and equipped, which is why this underlying bill continues the expansion of the nation’s Army Corps and Marine Corps. However, to tie the hands of our military commanders to deploy forces is a dangerous precedent.

Of course, Sen. McConnell really wouldn’t know how much rest is necessary for active duty troops, being that he was a sickly youth and conveniently was unable to serve in Vietnam.

Speaking of which, there is an excellent post over at DailyKos about the cowardice of some members of our legislature.

Moser: Kentucky at War

Matt Gunterman September 13th, 2007

The Nation Cover “Kentucky at War”

Bob Moser’s excellent analysis of the development of the movement to support the troops, end the war, and ditch Senator Mitch McConnell (R) has hit the stands.

The piece is too long to block quote here, but I’ll include excerpts particularly relevant to the Kentucky progressive blogosphere. You can read the entire article here.

Kentucky at War
Bob Moser

[...]

As summer–and McConnell’s recess vacation–approached, two new sets of nontraditional allies materialized to help LPAC bird-dog the senator, who makes his home in Louisville with his wife, Labor Secretary Elaine Chao. Matt Gunterman, a 30-year-old rural Kentucky native and Yale University graduate student, launched the DitchMitch blog earlier in the year, bringing together a varied band of bloggers from around the state on a composite site with a common goal. And in June, two young native Kentuckians and a Navy veteran opened an Iraq Summer headquarters in Louisville, part of a national campaign by Americans Against Escalation in Iraq (AAEI) to target key members of Congress with a homegrown antiwar message before they returned to Washington to resume the war debate.

By mid-August McConnell was sending out fundraising letters complaining about being harassed by “the ’60s antiwar movement on steroids.” But as the Republican kingmaker well knew, the reality was something altogether different from that old stereotype–and considerably more formidable.

Jim Pence is a 68-year-old, Salem-smoking, pickup-driving, self-proclaimed hillbilly from economically devastated Hardin County, retired after thirty-five years in the factory at the American Synthetic Rubber Corporation. Politically inactive until 2004, when Bush’s re-election and the war in Iraq spurred him to “vow to fight with every ounce of my strength from then on,” Pence now makes some of the freshest, funniest antiwar and political videos anywhere–and as a result, he’s become the unlikely heart and soul of Kentucky’s DitchMitch campaign.

Linking from his own Hillbilly Report website to DitchMitch and YouTube, Pence puts up snappy vignettes on subjects ranging from Kentucky’s annual bipartisan political hoedown at Fancy Farm–where McConnell made a hasty exit this year after being jeered by protesters carrying signs showing him as Bush’s hand puppet–to a fanciful take on Bush and Condoleezza Rice’s relationship, set to the tune of Frank Sinatra’s “The Way You Look Tonight,” to a hard-hitting series of exposés of liquor-industry fundraising by Ron Lewis, the holy-rolling Congressman from Pence’s district. “I don’t know, I just disappear into them,” Pence says on a dog-day August morning, navigating Louisville traffic en route to the Iraq Summer office. “I stay up some nights till 4 and 5, editing these things.”

DitchMitch creator Gunterman, whose postgraduate goal is to fire up an Internet-based “Ruralution,” connecting grassroots progressives from rural America to spur political action, sees Pence as a prime example of the passion and wit that generally go untapped by Democrats and urban progressives. “There’s no one like Jim in the entire United States,” says Gunterman. “Not with his age and his ornery attitude. He is very much a hillbilly, and he’s reinvigorated the term.”

In his three years of crisscrossing Kentucky to publicize its antiwar and progressive insurgencies, Pence has also stirred up the state’s traditionally timid left-wingers. “When I first went out with my camcorder, I’d go up to people at peace rallies and ask them, ‘Would you like to say something to Mitch?’ and they’d just go, ‘Uhhh…’ Or even if they would say anything, they’d say, ‘But I don’t want my picture taken.’ I just kept saying, ‘The newspaper’s not even going to cover this, and if TV does, it’ll be for ten seconds. Whereas this video’s going up on YouTube tomorrow.’” As Pence kept filming and posting his increasingly popular videos, the activists opened up and embraced this new mechanism for showing that, yes, the military stronghold of Kentucky has a vigorous antiwar effort. “People are stepping out more than they would a few years ago,” Pence says. “Now I can’t get them to stop talking when they see that camera. People know me now, and for the most part they trust me–whether or not they should!”

While Pence and DitchMitch have inspirited Kentucky activists, they’ve also pushed the state’s more established media to take notice of the progressive groundswell. “DitchMitch gives us the power to hold the media accountable in Kentucky for the first time,” says 24-year-old Shawn Dixon, a native of rural western Kentucky who’s just started his first year at NYU law school. In 2004, when Dixon was working as deputy policy and communications director for Democrat Daniel Mongiardo’s uphill Senate challenge to Republican Jim Bunning, he spent much of the campaign in a state of frustration over Kentucky newspapers’ assumption that the incumbent would cruise to victory. “There was no recognition that this would be a competitive election and that this guy was beatable until about a month before the election, when it became impossible to ignore.” Bunning wobbled back to Washington with a slender 23,000-vote victory, but this time around, with LPAC continually raising eyebrows and DitchMitch helping to popularize the anti-McConnell movement, “the media don’t have a choice,” Dixon says. On the same day in late July that Louisville’s Courier-Journal ran a column about McConnell’s dip in popularity (below 50 percent approval), the Herald-Leader in Lexington ran a story, sixteen months before the election, titled “McConnell Vulnerable.”

That’s music to Pence’s ears. “It’s not just what he’s done to perpetuate this war,” says the high-tech hillbilly. “It’s what he hasn’t done for Kentuckians, with all his power, on healthcare and so many other issues that really matter to folks at their kitchen tables. We’re trying to cut through the kind of moral-values crap that McConnell’s been using for twenty-five years to get himself elected. We’re doing what we can to show the emperors without their clothes. And show that the folks who don’t like Mitch, and can’t stand this war, are just regular people like me who finally woke up and spoke up.”

[...]

Kentucky’s progressive community about to rock America

Matt Gunterman September 12th, 2007

Coming to a newsstand near you: The Nation with Bob Moser’s cover story entitled “Kentucky at War,” which examines Kentucky’s progressive grassroots community and how it’s reshaping the political and ideological landscapes of that state — and doing so outside the rigid, tepid, and unresponsive party structures.

It’s gonna be a hell of a read!

The Nation Cover “Kentucky at War”

McConnell’s bile and viciousness tearing GOP apart

Matt Gunterman September 7th, 2007

Before things started falling apart for the Kentucky GOP with the administration of Governor Ernie Fletcher (R) and at the national level with the worsening crises of the bungling presidency of George W. Bush, Senator Mitch McConnell (R) had the luxury of reserving his bile and viciousness for Democrats.

As the going’s gotten rough as of late, McConnell has found himself at odds with his number two Senator Trent Lott (R) and others in leadership (most visibly during the debate over immigration reform), with his fellow Kentuckian Senator Jim Bunning (R) over the handling of the latest GOP scandal with Senator Larry Craig (R), and now McConnell’s wicked traits of personality are tearing the entire GOP apart on Capital Hill. Here’s the story from The Hill:

Lashing out at McConnell
By Betsy Rothstein and Elana Schor

Rep. Mike Simpson (R) condemned Senate GOP leaders on Thursday for their treatment of fellow Idahoan Sen. Larry Craig (R), accusing them of hypocrisy.

“I hope I never stub my toe and they throw me under the bus,” Simpson said of Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and other Republican leaders. “It kind of makes you wonder what party you want to be a member of.”

Simpson underscored that he is not considering switching parties. But he also emphasized that he would not want to serve in the Senate, even if chosen by Idaho Gov. C.L. “Butch” Otter (R) to replace Craig.

The five-term House member appeared ready to take himself out of the running for a Senate appointment, even though his name remains on Otter’s short list and Craig veered back on Thursday toward resigning, as planned, on Sept. 30.

Simpson said he would pursue a Senate appointment were it in the best interests of his state, but analysts have agreed that his House seniority and status as an appropriator make Simpson more politically valuable to his state if he stays put.

The frustrated response from Simpson, a longtime ally of House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio), also rekindles the embers of House-Senate tension that at times plagued Republicans during their time in the majority.

“If that’s how they treat their own,” Simpson said, referring to Senate GOP leaders’ quick push for Craig to resign, “that tells me they’re more interested in party than individuals, and the party is made up of individuals. How you treat them says a lot about your party.”

Simpson pointed a finger at Craig’s leaders for staying mum on the legal and personal jeopardy facing other GOP senators, including Alaskan Ted Stevens, now under federal investigations, and Louisianan David Vitter, who has admitted contacting an escort service.

“They have people over there [in the Senate Republican Conference] in far worse trouble that they haven’t said a thing about,” Simpson said.

Simpson was not present for Craig’s emotional resignation announcement speech on Saturday, but said he spoke with Craig by phone that day. Simpson emphasized the bond between his and Craig’s families.

McConnell declined to comment on Simpson’s remarks, but Senate Republican sources shrugged off his frustration with their conference’s handling of Craig.

“Who cares what Simpson thinks? He is irrelevant,” one Senate GOP aide said. “We didn’t throw [Craig] under the bus. He lay down in front of it and it ran over him. There is a great deal of compassion for him as a human being and a colleague. But this is bigger than him and that single Senate seat.”

“Condemning decisions that were met with near unanimous praise inside the conference and out is an obvious political miscalculation,” said another Senate Republican aide. “If the representative truly believes that Senate leadership is the one that deserves criticism in this incident, then his senatorial ambitions are far outweighing reality.”

[...]

Kentucky in 2007 is the national GOP’s canary in a coalmine

Matt Gunterman August 19th, 2007

With all the tragedy as of late in our nation’s coalmines and with Kentucky’s Senator Mitch McConnell and his wife Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao at the center of a web of money-grubbing and influence-mongering in Washington that has left these many coalmines the deathtraps that they are for the sake of the almighty campaign contribution and a few ticks on the profit margin, I think the analogy of Kentucky’s gubernatorial election this year being the GOP’s canary in a coalmine is a fitting one.

Watch this latest video from Jim Pence of DitchMitchKY and the HillbillyReport. What’s going on in the video with security personnel at the Kentucky State Fair trying to end an anti-war protest (until they’re set straight by the State Police) is fascinating enough, but what’s even more fascinating is what’s going on in the background: all those cars honking in support of the protest.

Recall that thirteen years ago in 1994, on the cusp of the so-called Republican Revolution, Kentucky served the Democrats in a similar capacity. Then the death in March of that year of Democratic Congressman William H. Natcher (KY-02)—who had represented the district since 1953 and who continues to hold the all-time record for consecutive votes in Congress at 18,401—set up a special election for the seat.

I was only 17 years old at the time, but I had been politically aware since the 1988 presidential campaign, when a longtime Democratic activist in my church started hauling me to rallies, the biggest of those being Democratic vice presidential candidate Lloyd Bentsen’s appearance at the Big Tobacco warehouse in Owensboro, today the largest city in the Second District. I don’t remember anything about the substance of what was said there, but I remember the energy, the pomp, and the confidence among the Democrats gathered.

Yet, a mere six years later the entire region of the Second District was seething against the political establishment and its status quo, its distance, and indifference. That establishment was Democratic.

Perhaps that environment is best encapsulated in a scene that has now been immortalized in Michael Moore’s latest film SiCKO. On August 29, 1994, at a rally in Owensboro, “Tobacco Rights Activists” burned an effigy of then First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in protest of President Bill Clinton’s health care plan. With a bluegrass band playing the back ground, Stan Arachikavitz, president of the Kentucky Association of Tobacco Supporters, chanted “burn, baby, burn,” as the effigy was doused in gasoline and two women set it ablaze. When asked for comment by a reporter, Arachikavitz replied, “Hillary didn’t last as long as my Marlboro.” The nation was outraged, but there was a quiet satisfaction among many across western Kentucky.

At that rally was Ron Lewis, the Second District’s newly elected Republican congressman. In what had been a shock to Kentucky’s political establishment—if no-one else—Lewis had defeated longtime Kentucky State Senator Joe Prather in the May special election to succeed Natcher. Lewis had won with 55 percent of the vote on a turnout of less than 20 percent. A fundamentalist Christian, Baptist minister, and religious bookstore owner, Lewis had been recruited to the race by Senator Mitch McConnell, who had been narrowly elected to his own seat ten years earlier in 1984 on the coattails of Ronald Reagan.

You may recalled that Lewis’s campaign commercials in the special election had famously morphed Prather’s head into that of Bill Clinton, who was then near the height of his unpopularity. The national GOP considered the technique a success and went on to use it widely in the general election that year. Meanwhile, rumors had circulated in the district that Joe Prather was in Washington to look for a house. Perhaps it was just a rumor spread by the McConnell machine, but it might as well have been true, such was the arrogance and sense of entitlement of Kentucky Democrats of the day.

McConnell went on to recruit Republican Ed Whitfield—who had just as much personal dynamism as Lewis—to run in the First Congressional District in the fall. Both Lewis and Whitfield won; Whitfield became the first Republican ever elected to the First District.

My point with all this is that the political establishment in Kentucky at that time—conservative Southern Democrats—was a bloated and opaque bubble. Its bloated-ness allowed the good old boys to make room for more of their own inside and its opaqueness kept their less-than-altruistic dealings hidden from the masses, but those very same qualities kept the good old boys from witnessing the trouble that was brewing for them on the outside–in the real world.

Mitch McConnell burst their bubble.

Unfortunately, the Kentucky Republican Party that Mitch McConnell replaced the good old boy Democrats with was a political machine that set about inflaming the ugliest elements of Kentucky’s own culture: its racism, its bigotry, its sexism, its churlishness, its phobias, and its anti-intellectualism.

The thing to remember about Mitch McConnell (and this is something that his fellow Republicans in the U.S. Senate are discovering now about him in his capacity as Minority Leader) is that McConnell always has McConnell’s interests first. He’s not at all concerned about the long-term consequences of his tactics and actions on the people of Kentucky. What he’s counting on is that Kentuckians and the state’s chattering class will never fully digest the disaster that was McConnell’s Senate career so long as there’s plenty of pork named after him spread around the state.

Mitch McConnell took Kentucky, a state already at the bottom of the cultural and economic barrel of the nation, and he exacerbated the very social qualities of the place that had kept true progress (making gains on its peers, rather than playing catch up) out of reach for so long. McConnell’s strategy was to spear his political legacy with a wicked trident of slash-and-burn partisan politics, redneck populism, and moneyed corporate interests.

McConnell’s Kentucky GOP is today the political establishment in the state, and you can see what sort of establishment it is by the criminal behavior and incompetence of the administration of Governor Ernie Fletcher (R).

As I write, that Republican establishment is bunkering itself deep beneath the political reality on the ground in Kentucky. While Ernie Fletcher and his minions ratchet up their language of fear on expanded gaming and hate against sexual minorities and while Mitch McConnell continues to cultivate the corrupt environment of campaign finance in Washington that he fathered and stands steadfast behind the reckless presidency of George W. Bush, neither Fletcher or McConnell is making headway among Kentuckians.

Both are indeed consolidating support among their conservative base, but that base is shrinking. Kentuckians are waking up to the reality of what Fletcher, McConnell, and conservatives truly are.

The people of Kentucky are once again seething against their political establishment, but this time there is an energized and organized progressive Democratic party waiting in the wings. Whereas last time when Kentuckians cleaned political house they replaced bad with worse, this time the alternative to entrenched Republican corruption is a Democratic party that offers the hope of change and a better future for us all.

Mitch McConnell Reads DitchMitchKY

Joe Sonka August 16th, 2007

Well, it looks like we’ve really gotten under someone’s skin.

Mitch McConnell is sending out fundraising letters to supporters in which he whines about the "liberals, radicals, far-left, unions, Hillary, Schumer, etc…" who are hounding him about his pathetic record and his obedience to corporate contributers and George W. Bush rather than his constituents in Kentucky. In fact, we are "the 60’s anti-war movement on steroids!". That’s probably the greatest unintentional complement I’ve ever received. I think I’ll have that put on my gravestone/obituary: "one of the leaders of the 60’s anti-war movement on steroids".

Anyway, Mitchy even gives a big shout out to the good folks at Ditch Mitch!

"Liberals on the internet have already created a website called "Ditch Mitch," and 6,000 radicals from across the nation have already signed up."

Hey, Mitchy, glad to see you’re reading the site! We feel humbled by your presence.

And as far as being a "radical", I wish. I don’t think you can have an 8-5 Mon-Fri non-political office job and be defined as "radical". But I aspire to prove you right someday, Mitchy. And we’re FAR more than 6,000, I can guarantee you that.

On second thought, maybe I’ll have "the leader of 6,000 liberal radicals" on my gravestone/obituary, that’s even better. (Though that honor technically should go to Matt Gunterman or Aniello, amongst a few others.)

And look what we have here. Why it’s Mitchy’s full faundraising letter, in all of its paranoid glory. It’s funny, you can almost smell the desperation in here. For Christ’s sake, have a little more dignity Mitchy.

Mitch_001 MitchMitch_002_2

Mitch_003

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

What next for McConnell? Perhaps an attack on the salon-like atmosphere at Starbucks and how it undermines Midwestern values?

Matt Gunterman August 16th, 2007

I don’t know whether the best modifier for Senator Mitch McConnell’s behavior as of late is weird, desperate, silly, lame, or stupid, but Senate 2008 Guru calls it “esoteric” and that word seems to fit on many different levels. So, esoteric it is.

The evidence?

First, McConnell arrives at Fancy Farm and starts deranged rants about the supposed dangers of “liberals” and also of women like Democratic Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Democratic presidential contender Hillary Clinton. The problem for McConnell there is that, while liberals and powerful women might be dangerous in his claustrophobic DC bubble, the only dangers that Kentuckians are experiencing — like significant inflation at the pump and grocery, their sons and daughters being shipped over seas to tamp down a religious civil war, the threat of the loss of good jobs and being without health care — those things are the direct result of conservatives and Republican men (by and large).

Second, McConnell’s having an online seance with departed Democratic Senator Alben W. Barkley and hoping a bit of Barkley’s “hero” status wears off on him. There’s not a beloved Republican left in the nation, and there’s no living Democrat who will be seen with McConnell; so McConnell is forced to seek out the popular dead Democrats. What next? An effigy of FDR appearing with him at every campaign stop?

Now, we have Senator McConnell blathering about the dangers of an “Old Europe” mentality among Democrats. Yes, you know that Old Europe where the economy’s outperforming the U.S. and everyone has access to good education and health care? Yes, that Old Europe. Wouldn’t want to learn anything there, would we?

Here’s what McConnell had to say, from The Hill.

McConnell slams ‘Old Europe’ Democrats
By Manu Raju
August 15, 2007
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) mocked congressional Democrats Wednesday, attacking the new leadership of the 110th Congress for attempting to ram through proposals that would turn the American government into “Old Europe.”

In a speech at the Ronald Reagan presidential library in Simi Valley, Calif., he said Democratic leaders have been pushing through bills on health care, federal spending and taxes that would substantial grow the government and lead to the economic stagnation that has dogged some European countries.

“I can tell you that in the Senate it seems as though the other side is still looking to Old Europe for answers,” McConnell said. “In one of the great political ironies of our time, the new majority in Congress seems intent on taking America down the path of bigger government and higher taxes just as Europe is frantically trying to steer themselves away from it.”

[...]

“The Senate Minority Leader might be focused on Old Europe, but the vast majority of Americans are more interested in what he is going to do to change course in Iraq,” responded Rodell Mollineau, a spokesperson for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). “It is our hope that come September, he and other Senate Republicans will stop protecting the president and begin working with us to redeploy our troops from an open-ended civil war.”

Political Wire: Discontent among Republicans with GOP leadership in Congress growing

Matt Gunterman August 15th, 2007

Check it out. Political Wire notes that the Evans-Novak Political Report says that there’s discontent growing among Republicans in the House and the Senate over their respective leadership teams. That would, of course, mean Senator Mitch McConnell (R).

If the national GOP decides to avoid political wilderness for the better part of a generation by quickly and aggressively embracing the rhetoric and an agenda of reform, one of the keys to that reform will be dispensing with Mitch McConnell.

McConnell is not only a symbol of the old guard, he practically founded the system of money-grubbing and influence-mongering that corrupts and paralyzes American politics today.

In the end, Mitch McConnell may survive this election next year, but his legacy will be one of shame, fecklessness, and incompetence.

Republican Leadership May Face Test

From the latest Evans-Novak Political Report: “Discontent with the GOP leadership is growing within the slender band of Republican reformers in both the House and Senate. They are considering but have not decided whether to go public.”

T.G.I.F.

Terri Whitehouse August 3rd, 2007

The DM-KY team has a jam-packed weekend, and while I won’t be attendance at Fancy Farm, my posting, too, will be sporadic. Don’t let that stop you from checking in, though, as I know that I am looking forward to hearing about YearlyKos and Fancy Farm from some of my favorite bloggers. (I’m not just saying that, I promise.)

To kick things off, check out Sam Youngman’s national coverage of Kentucky’s governor’s race and the impact it will have on the 2008 U.S. Senate campaign. I think all this interest will make for a very interesting picnic!

Sen. Mitch McConnell Is a Heckuva Busy Man!

Terri Whitehouse August 2nd, 2007

Between hiring a stealthy campaign strategist for his 2008 reelection campaign, working to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and reluctantly voting for greater transparency in government, how on earth does Sen. Mitch McConnell find the time to draft some b.s. anti-family and anti-children legislation and find the nerve to call it the “Kids First Act”?

Being a literary sort of person, I should probably recognize this whole nonsense of cleverly naming legislation so that Americans will not be outraged at what the legislation really says and does as an ironic device. Fortunately, my low-brow aesthetic most always trumps my literary one, and from here on out I will refer to this practice (system, manner, or condition) as it occurs in politics, as “oppositism.” The noun “oppositicity” will describe the state or quality of being of an “oppositist” mindset. An “oppositist” shall henceforth refer to any politician who insults my intelligence by engaging in oppositism.

McConnell Fights to Deny Healthcare for Children

Joe Sonka July 25th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

If you ever wanted to know just what type of person Mitch McConnell is, all you have to do is read this story from the NYT this morning:

WASHINGTON, July 24 — Republican leaders of the House and Senate on
Tuesday attacked proposals that call for a major expansion of the
Children’s Health Insurance Program, to be financed with higher tobacco
taxes.

Republicans will fight these proposals,” said the House Republican leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio.

In an unexpected turn of events, the top two Republicans in the Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Trent Lott
of Mississippi, said they opposed a bipartisan bill that the Senate
Finance Committee approved last week and would offer an alternative on
the Senate floor.

House Democrats announced their proposals on
Tuesday night and estimated that they would provide coverage for five
million children who are now uninsured. The Senate bill is expected to
cover 3.2 million children.

Yes, it’s about time those poor kids pulled themselves up by their own bootstraps. Can’t they get a paper route or something? Damn lazy ingrates.

The bill approved by the Senate Finance Committee, 17 to 4, calls for an increase of $35 billion, for a total of $60 billion.

In a letter to colleagues, Mr. McConnell and Mr. Lott said that the measure “imposes an open-ended financial burden on American taxpayers and takes a significant step toward a government-run health care system.”

Six Republicans voted for the bill. Mr. McConnell said other Republican senators were concerned about “the size of the plan
that came out of the Finance Committee and what that may portend for the future in terms of an entire government takeover of American health care and, in essence, a single-payer system down the road.”

Representative Diana DeGette, Democrat of Colorado, a leading proponent of the House bill, said: “For the longest time, I was mystified why Republicans would oppose expansion of the Children’s Health Insurance Program to kids who are eligible but not enrolled. Now I realize. They are trying to deny us a political victory. They want to be able to say that Democrats can’t get anything done.

“Unfortunately,” Ms. DeGette said, “Republicans are pursuing this strategy on the backs of poor children.”

Yes, Mitch McConnell again shows just how out of touch he is with his constituents. Whether it’s Iraq or healthcare, Mitch just follows the pathetic party line. In the face of overwhelming public support to change course in Iraq and expand healthcare, Mitch would rather obstruct progress. This little plan he has to block every piece of legislation and then accuse the Democrats of running a "do nothing" Congress is cynical politics at its worst. It really shows a lack of respect for the intelligence of Kentuckians and all Americans. Mitch is banking on the fact that he’ll be able to convince the public that Democrats aren’t getting anything done, while Mitch and his Rethugs are the ones laying down roadblocks to every popular piece of legislation.

Kentuckians are smarter than that, Mitch. As the last SUSA poll shows, they’re beginning to catch on.

Mitch McConnell charm offensive among conservatives not catching fire

Matt Gunterman July 23rd, 2007

I’ve been noticing that during the last week a number of national conservative blogs have been featuring positive posts on Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY), the sort that praise his profound and rare leadership for the conservative movement and for Republicans in the U.S. Senate.

Unsurprisingly, these posts use pretty uniform language, which leads me to believe it’s an organized effort by McConnell’s people to combat the rampant theme in the blogosphere, both on the left and right and very much so in the mainstream media, that Mitch McConnell’s not doing a great job and perhaps isn’t up to the task.

Yet, I also noticed that the conservative blogs that are participating in McConnell’s campaign to praise himself really aren’t the conservative activist blogs, the ones that are at the heart of the conservative movement. The blogs that are defending McConnell are institutional blogs and the like. In other words, the conservative blogs that were creaming McConnell during the immigration reform battle are not the blogs that are now speaking kindly of him.

All’s not forgiven. The base of the Republican party and hardcore conservatives are not impressed.

Why should they be? Plus, why should they demonstrate fealty to McConnell. He is replaceable, after all, and will be easily replaced when the Republicans implode in the 2008 cycle and the party looks for new leadership and a new direction.

McConnell can’t represent that: he by his very nature cannot be a reformer. He will defend the status quo that made him the powerful money-monger and influence-peddler that he is until he himself falls from leadership and/or from office.

James R. Carroll of the Courier-Journal noted McConnell’s sour outlook on Republican chances for advancement in his column yesterday.

McConnell down over ‘08

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who himself is up for re-election next year, was not very gung-ho about GOP prospects in the Senate.

Republicans are defending 22 seats in all in 2008, compared with 12 for Democrats. The GOP has 49 seats in the Senate, the Democrats 51.

“If you look at the numbers, holding our own is … about all we could hope for,” he told reporters Friday at a Capitol press conference.

“It would take an extraordinarily good day to get back up to 50 (seats),” he said. “And so our goal is to stay roughly where we are.”

If this reality is finally sinking in for McConnell, you can only imagine what his mood will be like when his own severe vulnerability in 2008 sinks in to its fullest (it’s already worrying the man, of that we’re certain).

Courier-Journal: McConnell Should Lead

Matt Gunterman July 21st, 2007

The Courier-Journal and Herald-Leader editorials have been doing a terrific job of holding Senator Mitch McConnell accountable since he took over as Senate Minority Leader. McConnell has been making a big deal of all the power he’s supposed to have in Washington now. If that’s the case, let’s see him use it to make the nation a better place when he leaves than it was when he arrived. Of course, the Mitch McConnell we know has only been concerned with the state of his own Republican party in Kentucky and in DC. The nation’s and the American people as a whole have not been at the center of his career.

This editorial appeared yesterday:

McConnell should lead

If Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is upset about being portrayed as a blinkered partisan, maybe he should try something new.

It’s called leadership.

And there is no more important issue on which to exhibit it than on the Iraq war. But instead of living up to his title, Sen. McConnell prefers to bury his head in the sand and ignore facts on the ground, not to mention the public’s dwindling support for this conflict.

This week he helped Republicans filibuster a final vote on pulling out of Iraq. But, instead of providing the American people with a reason to continue the occupation, he glibly accused Democrats of conducting political theater, referring to “all the gags and giggles and gimmicks, the cold pizza and the empty cots.”

“My constituents are overwhelmingly on the side of Gen. (David) Petraeus and the effort,” Mr. McConnell insisted earlier this week. “We are the home of the 101st Airborne. We also have Fort Knox.”.

It would be one thing if Sen. McConnell were using his position to posit an ethical justification for a continued American military presence in Iraq. In doing so, he would be disagreeing with 52 percent of Kentuckians, who want the war to end, according to a Courier-Journal Bluegrass Poll, but at least he would be trying to persuade his constituency. That is called leadership.

It’s quite another thing to defend the war by politicizing the soldiers who are courageously containing an Iraqi civil war. Everyone supports the troops, many of whom are serving because of a deep love for their country and because such service is a family tradition. But Sen. McConnell cynically offers support for the troops as political cover.

That’s a cheap trick. It neither demonstrates political conviction nor acknowledges the people’s will — both things that leaders do.

There is no more significant issue to voters than the Iraq war, and rightly so. More than 3,500 Americans have died in combat, and civil society in Iraq has been destroyed.

There are many legitimate concerns about an American withdrawal from Iraq, but Sen. McConnell doesn’t honestly address any of them. He just indulges in word games, to offer Republican colleagues wiggle room. There are many descriptions for that kind of posturing, but leadership is not one of them.

Harry Reid: Mitch McConnell is a “partisan obstruction”

Matt Gunterman July 17th, 2007

Mitch McConnell gets it on with Satan

I predict that the Republican filibuster that’s going to happen tonight — all night tonight — is going to be recorded as the event that really sent Senator Mitch McConnell’s thus-far unspectacular stint as Senate Minority Leader over into the abyss of utter disaster.

What goes on tonight is a spectacle that the nation is going to talk about because it’s something that’s not happened often. It’s a politically sublime moment. There’s drama in it, and the Republicans are going to be front-and-center making a choice in front of the nation:

Republicans, are you going to protect President George W. Bush or the troops?

I know Mitch McConnell’s will choose George W. Bush. He has every time before, and he will again.

Here’s what Majority Leader Harry Reid had to say today about Mitch McConnell and his diabolical obstructionism:

Senator Mitch McConnell
Republican Leader
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator McConnell:

There are no more solemn decisions facing members of Congress than the conduct of war and the placing of our troops in harm’s way. As you know, more than 3,600 brave Americans have lost their lives and more than $400 billion has been expended on the war in Iraq, which has now moved into its fifth year with no end in sight. Yet Senate Republicans have chosen to prevent honest debate and action on legislation to provide an Iraq strategy that would allow us to responsibly redeploy our troops and refocus our attention on the very real threat posed by Al Qaeda. This is partisan obstruction that I fear will make us less, not more, secure and I urge you to reconsider your course.

Today’s headlines confirm the importance of allowing the Senate to consider amendments to change course in Iraq and refocus our resources so we can more effectively wage the war on terror. These news reports indicate the violence in northern Iraq has escalated at the same time the Director of National Intelligence released a new assessment that al Qaeda has “regenerated key elements of its Homeland attack capability.” As long as our troops are mired in policing an Iraqi civil war, they cannot focus on the enemy that attacked this nation nearly six years ago; an enemy that has regrettably regenerated its attack capacity since 9/11.

Furthermore, contrary to your previous assertions, there is a long bipartisan tradition of allowing Senators to offer defense-related amendments on the Defense Authorization bill without the obstruction Senate Republicans are employing today. The record also clearly shows that both Senate Democrats and Republicans have recently foregone the opportunity to block action on important Iraq-related provisions. For example, just last year, the Senate voted up or down on two Iraq-related amendments on the Defense Authorization bill. Additionally, Senate Democrats did not place a 60-vote hurdle in front of a Republican amendment to strike Iraq policy language in the Iraq Supplemental Spending bill. Nor did votes on final passage of the Iraq supplemental require sixty votes.

Therefore, I renew the proposal I offered to you yesterday to permit the Senate to act on a series of amendments pertaining to Iraq. Under my proposal, the Senate would hold up or down votes on the bipartisan amendments offered by (1) Senators Levin and Reed, (2) Lugar and Warner, (3) Salazar and Alexander, and (4) Nelson and Collins. There may well be other amendments that Republican and Democratic Senators wish to offer related to Iraq, and I would be willing to work with you to ensure these amendments also receive up or down votes.

For the sake of our troops and the American people, I hope you reconsider your decision to obstruct Senate action on critical amendments that could change course the course of the war in Iraq.

Sincerely,

Harry Reid
U.S. Senate

The story that Senator Mitch McConnell is trying to be an “absentee” leader has legs: nationwide legs

Matt Gunterman July 17th, 2007

Wow. Wow. WOW!

You know, the ultimate goal of the wider Ditch Mitch movement is to defeat Senator Mitch McConnell at the ballot box in November 2008.

However, our penultimate goal is to ensure that, defeat or no defeat at the ballot box, the nation comes to know Mitch McConnell for what he really is: a smarmy, self-interested, bile-infested, money-grubbing, influence-mongering redneck from Alabama. We are making certain that the legacy of McConnell is exactly the one his filthy career deserves.

And, while we’re well on our way to accomplishing both objectives, we’re really getting across the latter point these days.

This article from the Associated Press’s Julie Hirschfeld Davis highlights several important aspects. I’m linking to the article as it appeared in Forbes.

GOP Senator Walks a Narrow Line on Iraq

WASHINGTON - Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell was conspicuous by his absence when key Republicans met with White House officials last week on how to limit party defections on Iraq.

And weeks earlier he had raised eyebrows among some of his colleagues by disappearing into the woodwork in the immigration debate, then voting against President Bush’s plan.

Lately, the laconic Kentuckian who is supposed to be Bush’s point man on Capitol Hill has been anything but.

McConnell - a stern-faced strategist in a chamber full of bombastic orators - has never been the type to seek the spotlight, and his allies say his recent approach is in keeping with his low-key style.

Stung by the criticism that he was being an absentee leader, McConnell struck back late last week, moving daily strategy meetings on Iraq into his Capitol office suite, rushing to join news conferences and schedule TV appearances, and making a rare impromptu stop in the Capitol to chat with reporters on the war.

“I don’t know how visible visible is, but I’ve had numerous meetings - I met with the president (July 11) on the subject, I’m involved in working the votes on the floor. I think you’re being spun on this issue,” said McConnell.

[...]

Still, McConnell is battling a perception among some top Republicans that he has shrunk from the debate on Iraq - just as he did on immigration - in efforts to insulate himself on a difficult issue that could affect his own re-election.

McConnell - like many of the Senate Republicans who have distanced themselves from Bush’s war policy - is to face voters in 2008. He won his last election with 65 percent of the vote in Kentucky, but with the political climate for Republicans deteriorating, the leader could be particularly vulnerable to charges that he has marched in lockstep with Bush.

“McConnell knows he can’t take anything for granted, and he doesn’t,” said Al Cross, who runs a rural journalism center at the University of Kentucky. “The immigration vote was the real signal that he knows he’s not a shoo-in for re-election.”

[...]

Privately, however, some Republicans and their top aides express alarm that McConnell has recently hung back on more divisive issues, allowing party rifts to be highlighted and weakening Bush’s position where he can least afford it.

In many cases, Sens. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who chairs the party’s communications operation, and Trent Lott, R-Miss., the whip, have instead taken the lead. It was Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who stepped in to organize daily strategy sessions on Iraq last week before McConnell began holding them in his office.

[...]

“I have a number of my members who are in favor of it, and out of respect for them, I’m not going to announce how I’m going to vote - yet,” McConnell said late last week, with the plan still emerging.

That’s little comfort to the White House as it tries to beat back the idea that Republican support for Bush’s war policy is eroding by the day.

“The White House needs him badly right now, but McConnell’s first constituency is his colleagues,” said John J. Pitney, a Claremont McKenna College political scientist. “If they’re expecting a minority leader who’s going to fall on his sword for the White House and sacrifice Republicans seats, they’re not going to find anybody. McConnell is the best that they’re going to get.”

Mitch Continues to Lose Military Support Back Home

Joe Sonka July 15th, 2007

(Crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

This morning the Lexington Herald-Leader ran a story about the immense strain that the Iraq War has had on the Ft. Campbell community. Once an area of uniform support for Bush and McConnell, military families are now beginning to question the nonsensical policies of Bush/McConnell. The 101st Airborne is now preparing for its 3rd deployment to Iraq, a rather remarkable fact, considering the war has only lasted a little over 4 years. And now these military families, that have sacrificed so much, have their Senator, Mitch McConnell, voting against and organize the filibuster of the Webb amendment, which would finally give our soldiers the proper rest and rotation they deserve before they are sent to Iraq. Scores of wounded soldiers all around the country, including Ft. Campbell, are getting injured in Iraq, coming home, and then finding out that they’re going right back to Iraq. It’s shameful what Mitch McConnell is doing, and the Ft. Campbell community is beginning to speak up against it. From the article:

A few days after the Sept. 11 attacks, Bo Ward put these words on the sign at his 12-chair barbershop near the main gate at Fort Campbell: "President Bush, show no mercy. Kick their ass!"

But almost six years later, and after more than four years of war in Iraq, Ward’s no longer so sure.

"Soldiers are tired; wives are tired; families are getting worn down," Ward said. "I know these boys can’t just pick up and come home from Iraq, but we need some kind of exit plan."

U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell’s recent visit to Fort Campbell highlighted the emotional strain and frustration this southwestern Kentucky military town is feeling as the 101st Airborne Division prepares for its third deployment since the Iraq war began.

Pressure back home

McConnell, who is up for re-election next year, also faces increasing pressure in Kentucky from Democrats. The Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, a national group, launched commercials this week that are highly critical of the senator’s leadership on the war and are aimed at eroding support in his home state.

Kentucky has given heavily to the war effort. Fort Campbell’s latest round of deployments will push to 23,000 the number of soldiers from the post serving in the Middle East conflict.

At Fort Campbell, the place Gen. David Petraeus, the top U.S. military commander in Iraq, once called home, feelings about ongoing efforts in the Middle East and Republican leadership during the war are mixed.

On any given weekday, Ward’s barbershop, the fort’s largest, is a place where privates and senior officers sit side by side waiting for a trim. Ward chats with these soldiers as he snips away. And he says he thinks many of them now would be happy to see Washington set a date for leaving Iraq.

"Right now, you’ve got first sergeants and sergeant majors and E-7s and E-8s that are getting out of the army right and left," Ward said. "They’re saying ‘I’ve been deployed three times, I’m pressing my luck, I’m not going to give up my life and my family for something where there’s no end to it.’"

Karla Tucker works at a furniture store just down the street where many military families shop. She also says that many soldiers, exhausted by repeated deployments, are deciding not to "re-up" as their enlistments end.

"These young men and women are coming back with all kinds of problems; some of them are on anti-depressants; their marriages are in trouble," Tucker said. "There are families right and left that are deciding not to hang around; they’re leaving here and going home. I personally have not heard anyone say they’re going to re-enlist. It’s sad."

"Mitch McConnell is on the floor of the U.S. Senate every day standing in the way of changing policy in Iraq," said DSCC spokesman Matthew Miller. "He is the face of the party. When the party marches lock-step with the president’s policies, then in 2008 the voters will hold them accountable."

Mitch, who displayed how remarkably out of touch he is with his constituents on CNN last week, is going to hear this discontent more and more this summer, especially from Iraq Summer and VoteVets, as Kentucky veterans follow his every move.

Meanwhile, Marine vet Jim Webb shows how you deal with a repetitive talking point regurgitator and Bush enabler on Meet the Press.

Can you imagine Mitch McConnell having to debate a tough Marine veteran like this in his Senate race next year? Someone that actually has a DISTINGUISHED military record and can speak for the veterans and their families that have paid such a heavy price for their sacrifice to their country in Iraq?

Perhaps we can make that happen, eh?