Archive for the 'Stan Lee' Category

The Only Thing We Have to Fear…

Terri Whitehouse March 19th, 2008

Nope. It’s not the ’stache. Why, it’s the illegals, of course!

Rep. Tom Burch, D-Louisville, narrowly lost a bid on the House floor to spread statewide a program to give official identification cards to homeless people.

Burch said many homeless people are veterans who need an official ID to collect benefits. He said a similar program has worked well in Jefferson County and would require three people who work at a homeless shelter to verify identity.

But the debate on House Bill 308 stirred up House Republicans. Rep. Stan Lee, R-Lexington, said the IDs could end up in the hands of illegal immigrants.

There are no words. None.

If you’re feeling particularly masochistic, check out this little piece about what happens when we start nouning adjectives. And this one.

The sanctity of all human life, my shiny hiney. In the eyes of Republicans, the only thing more subhuman than a homeless person is an immigrant. Despicable.

Do Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) and his ‘mate Robbie Rudolph (R) touch themselves? If so, they’ve committed homosexual acts

Matt Gunterman November 5th, 2007

All this talk by Republicans about other people’s sexuality has got me thinking.Robbie Rudolph (R) touches himself.

First, if a man has sex with a horse BUT while having sex with that horse he closes his eyes and thinks only of a woman, has that man not still committed an act of bestiality?

I’d say the answer is, yes, he has.

Now, similarly, if a man closes his eyes and thinks of a woman and has sex with himself, is he not committing a homosexual act? Are not in this act the hands of a man gratifying the genitals of a man? Does it matter that there’s an imaginary woman involved? Is not a man nevertheless sexually stimulating a man? Isn’t that the definition of a homosexual act?

So, unless Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) and his ‘mate Robbie Rudolph (R) are prepared to go on record that they abstain from masturbation and consider the act abhorrent, then I don’t know that these two men [and, heck, let's throw in Rep. Stan Lee (R) for good measure] have much moral authority when it comes to speaking out against gays.

Soon-to-be Gov. Steve Beshear can transform how the world sees Kentucky and how Kentuckians see themselves

Matt Gunterman November 5th, 2007

Yesterday morning a German friend emailed me to say that The New York Times Sunday travel section was running a feature on the finer qualities of bourbon and bluegrass in Kentucky.

He’s read much about Kentucky lately, and it’s intriguing him. Just last week, both the London-based Guardian newspaper and The American Prospect magazine ran pieces on the growth of progressive culture and politics in Kentucky. These follow in the wake of Bob Moser’s monumental cover story on Kentucky for The Nation in September.

When Terence Samuel, who authored the Guardian and TAP articles, interviewed me, he made the comment, “Everyone’s talking about Kentucky.”

People around the world are talking about Kentucky because — right here, right now — Kentuckians are offering them hope. In us they see the potential that the American spirit that has inspired so many generations of the past is finally awakening and is ready to take on the wicked specter that is the creation of hate- and fear-mongers like Pres. George W. Bush (R), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R), Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R), and Rep. Stan Lee (R).

They see it in the workers who are out canvassing neighborhoods today. They see it in the peace demonstrators who are agitating to end a senseless war. They see it in the families who are fighting for their children’s health care. They see it in the crusade to protect and restore our environment. They see it in people of faith who are standing up to the bigots and bullies who have dominated Kentucky pulpits for too long.

The evidence is all around that something is happening in Kentucky, and the world is hungry for that something to be a people who are innovative, bold, tolerant, and progressive.

There is not a thing about McConnell, Fletcher, or Lee that’s any of those things. They are instead calculating, rigid, bullying, and conservative.

Soon-to-be Governor-elect Steve Beshear (D) will have the opportunity to communicate to the world what the new Kentucky is all about.

Ernie Fletcher saw “selling” Kentucky as a mere re-branding exercise. Nothing of the substance changed, and the discerning public could see through that. Fletcher’s take on “unbridled spirit” was anything but.

But Beshear can change the substance because he is not beholden to the baser elements of Kentucky society; his opponent will win the vote of every sort of bigot our state has to offer. With Kentucky’s urban center of Louisville poised to enter a sort of renaissance (barring the next Bush recession undermining its growth), Kentucky can become part of a new face for the United States to the rest of the world, one that is dynamic and provocative, welcoming and welcomed.

Kentucky can’t move forward on jobs, education, or other quality of life issues if it doesn’t tackle those elements of its culture that are holding the state back, and Beshear is well positioned to change the conversation and move down a different path.

Rep. Stan Lee (R) is Kentucky’s version of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?)

Matt Gunterman October 31st, 2007

God bless Joe Sonka. God bless Joe Sonka because he works his tail off traversing Kentucky covering the various manifestations of right-wing lunacy in the commonwealth [If you haven't checked out Joe's blogosphere-famous coverage of the Creation Museum from earlier this year, do so].

I envy Joe because he has that ability to observe the multitude of nitwits that make up the Kentucky GOP with a humorous eye and a sly smirk. I, on the other hand, don’t suffer these fools so well, even from a thousand miles away. Yet Joe has the gift, through his writing, of putting the crazy nature of social conservatives in Kentucky in perspective.

For example, Joe has a frightening new report over at BlueGrassRoots (the article itself will be published in the Lexington-based W Weekly) about a recent meeting of the American Family Association of Kentucky.

I’m going to include some excerpts from Joe’s piece below, but the most important thing to remember is that both the Republican candidate for state attorney general, Rep. Stan Lee, and for state auditor, Linda Greenwell, were in attendance and fully engaged at this meeting.

You know how most of the world has been up-in-arms against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?) over his years-long effort to promote the cause of holocaust denial? It’s craziness. Rational people know it. That didn’t stop the Iranians from organizing and hosting a Holocaust denial conference last year. Birds of a feather flock together, as even the U.S.’s very own former Klu Klux Klan member David Duke took part.

In the end, we will never eliminate crazy beliefs like Holocaust denial, racism, xenophobia, or homophobia, but we can marginalize them. Peer pressure does work, especially here in the United States. Americans, by and large, want to be perceived as successful, accepted, and mainstream. So, by framing these sorts of beliefs as radical, extreme, undesirable and out-of-the-mainstream, you necessitate that people who continue to cling to them make an overt choice for themselves: which is more important to them, their hatred of others or their own prosperity?

It’s objectively true that hatred is not rational; it is morally wrong. Yet some people will not make the rational choice on their own; they need a little cajoling along the way. That’s where societal pressure comes into play.

Keep that in mind as you read what Joe has to say below about this meeting. Think about how outrageous its content was, and how scary it is that two of the Republican candidates for statewide office embraced this message and those who propagate it.

In short, these people at the American Family Association of Kentucky are free to have their beliefs; it’s a free country. The rest of us, however, should expect that men and women who strive to attain the highest levels of elected office in our land would not associate with them, would shun them. Instead, they are embracing them, and on election day the people of Kentucky will shun Stan Lee and Linda Greenwell as punishment.

Raging Bigotry and the Dying of the Right

Did you know that Lexington is run by the “Homosexual Hegemony”? That “the gays” own the government and the media? And the only way to get access to this power is to have the dirty gay sex with them?

Yea, neither did I.

[...]

Roughly 50 people squeezed into the cafeteria. After the first speaker told us how he escaped the evils of today’s society when God told him to start his own line of athletic apparel, it was Kent Ostrander’s turn. Ostrander, the founder of the like-minded Family Foundation, was a key player in the push to amend KY’s Constitution so that gay marriage and civil unions are now outlawed.

He was sure to preface his points with “now, I’m not trying to vilify homosexuals”. For example, he would say this just before his inaccurate tangent on how gay sex is the cause of 75% of AIDS in the world. “These people bring this on themselves!”

He further chastised UK, saying that allowing partners to receive health insurance is to tolerate and “validify” these relationships. Again, he “wasn’t trying to vilify gays”, but the “predatory ideas of the radical homosexual agenda” will destroy our families and society. Ostrander ended his speech, nearly shouting, “Our God shall reign!”

Next, a sociology student presented her research project on why the black community in Lexington is faced with the problems of poverty, crime and drug abuse. Her conclusion, after repeatedly informing us that she was a “scientist”? Young blacks in Lexington are mired in this because of….. The Gays. You see, homosexuals own all of the power in the black community of Lexington, coining it the “Homosexual Hegemony”. Those gays force young blacks wanting access to that power to tolerate and become acclimated to the gay lifestyle. One acclimated to this immorality, they succumb to the evils of drug abuse, crime and dirty gay sex.

But these are just the crazy ramblings of some small fringe cult, right? Apparently, not. Linda Greenwell, Republican candidate for Auditor in next week’s election, was happily handing out campaign literature to the crowd. Ostrander pointed out state Sen. Stan Lee in the crowd, thanking him for all of his work to “support our cause in Frankfort”. Lee, the Republican candidate for Attorney General, took a bow and soaked in the applause.

Then, it was Frank Simon’s turn. He jumped right into the “culture war” routine, blasting the godless villains who have taken the commandments, literal creation science and prayer out of public schools. “We need to stop them and GOD will stop them!”

Simon started in with the gays, then paused, putting on a coy exterior of doubt. “Oh, I don’t want to get into this…” before deciding to share his shocking video with the crowd. The lights were dimmed, and he presented a video that he claimed was being shown in schools. It showed a series of families, in which a child introduced us to his/her two mothers or fathers. Each child explained how, despite their differences, they love and protect each other just like any other family does.

The visceral reaction from the crowd was palpable. Audible gasps. Loud cries of “no!!!”, “my God!!”, “how dare they!” It resembled the “2-minute hate” out of Orwell’s 1984, the crowd whipped up into frenzy at the traitorous Goldstein. “This is what we’re up against!” cried Simon.

“Sure, kids drank beer back in my day, but it wasn’t until the gays that they started smoking the dope! ….. We never used to have to lock our doors!”

They culprit was the ubiquitous “They”. “They” took over our government. “They” want gay sex taught to our children. “They control the media! You’re only going to find out about these votes in Frankfort after they happen. That’s no accident. They don’t want you to know about them!”

Such bigotry among fundamentalists has many forbearers. This used to be the argument against “race-mixing”, how the Bible warned against it and it would tear down the fabric of our society. Such bigots were swept to the margins of society after the civil rights movement, but there is always a new “they” to latch onto. And while fomenting hatred towards gays has proved quite successful for the Christian Right, they also know that the gig is up.

Shortly after this AFA meeting, UK had a “coming out week”, where gay and straight students could show solidarity and promote tolerance. At one event, state Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, our first openly gay representative, told the crowd, “When I went to UK, something like this was unheard of. We’ve progressed to the point where this is now possible.”

And that is why we see the vitriol of the Christian right. They know that their loss in the culture war is imminent. A recent poll showed that those under 30 have rejected this brand of bigotry in politics, supporting gay rights in overwhelming numbers. There is even a rift among evangelicals, as a recent NYT article found many churches abandoning the obsession with gays, moving towards the social justice aspect of Christianity.

Tuesday’s election would seem to validate this trend, as Republicans Ernie Fletcher and Stan Lee are expected to lose by nearly 20 points. But victory is not yet upon us, as KY politicians will still seek to capitalize on this homophobic demographic (Even Todd Hollenbach, Dem. candidate for Treasurer, refuses to renounce Simon’s endorsement).

But at least we now know that it will take more than simply using homophobia to get elected in KY.

Of course, if I was Mexican, I’d be sweating a bit.

Happy Halloween, Mitch!

Joe Sonka October 26th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Mitch, whereas you find brain-damaged 12-yr. olds scary enough to smear in the press with LIES, we find your lack of basic human decency frightening. From the DSCC:

Also, I have it from a very good source that Stan Lee does not celebrate Halloween, because that is the holiday of Satan and Drag Queens. More details to follow….

This year, I’ll be a KY Democratic candidate who refuses to renounce an endorsement from Frank Simon.

Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) and his goons are behaving like bloggers, and that’s a problem

Matt Gunterman August 20th, 2007

I’m pasting today’s Political Notebook from the Courier-Journal’s Joseph Gerth below. It’s especially fun to read today, and he even offers a contest at the end: email him your ideas for doctored photographs of Ernie Fletcher.

Okay, very briefly, let me tell you how I see the world of politics, political journalism, and political blogging evolving in Kentucky.

First, professional political journalists now produce (and will continue to produce in the future) the vast majority of raw factual, objective materials that bloggers use. That’s the case because journalists are trained professionals, they get paid to do what they do full time, and they build up the networks needed to get the information they need to produce their craft.

Second, bloggers — on the left and the right — take the raw material that journalists produce and put it in a partisan context. Now, of course bloggers do upon occasion produce news of their own, but that’s the exception and not the rule. As an aside, I would never, ever, ever want to blog full time. I enjoy my day job too much, which is probably what these journalists would tell you about their experience with blogging, too. There is a real need among political junkies for our partisan context, however. We also spur dialog and provide a platform that allows for ideological issues and differences to be vetted.

In the end, with all this talk in the national media and traditional press about the inherent friction between bloggers and journalists, I think the biggest threat to political journalists, their profession, and trade is apathy among the public and a population that is so disconnected and uninformed from politics that it can’t digest and engage with it at the level of complexity that is needed in an increasingly complex American society.

In short: political bloggers number among political journalists most ardent readers, and political blogging has introduced me to the work of several journalists that I was previously very unaware of. Political blogging and political bloggers, as they both mature as a medium and community, might well serve to strengthen and broaden the impact of political journalism.

That having been said, I want to say that I’m a little bit disturbed by the behavior of Governor Ernie Fletcher (R) and his goons as of late. This altering of the image of Democratic candidate Steve Beshear takes the cake. Why?

As a transparently and viciously partisan and vicious blogger, I can and do say very ornery things about incompetent Republicans in Kentucky. That’s the luxury of being a blogger, especially one sitting a thousand miles away in the quiet seclusion of Yale’s Sterling Memorial Library, where the only thing distracting me at the moment is a beautiful creature standing a few feet away from me and looking at the New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia.

I doctor photographs, like this one and this one. I say things like, “Ernie Fletcher has a vagina up his asshole,” and, “Robbie Rudolph is a redneck idiot with no formal education,” and, “Stan Lee mixing his Christian fundamentalism with our politics makes him no better than a radical Islamicist.” I say these things because there’s a lot of truth to them and I say these things because I can. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to read my blog.

Yet, when our governor and his campaign start behaving like me, I think it betrays a great deal–that we already knew–about why the Fletcher administration is where it is. Ernie Fletcher and his goons never really understood the gravity and responsibility of the office and the unique opportunity they’ve been given. They still don’t understand it, and they never will understand it. But the people of Kentucky do understand it, and that’s why they’ll elect Steve Beshear this November.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Joseph Gerth | Political Notebook
Look before you leap

State Auditor Crit Luallen recently produced an audit mildly critical of the way state tourism funds have been spent, saying that Kentucky needs to develop a better strategic plan for spending new marketing money and determining if the money was spent wisely.

That upset at least one Republican blogger, Jessamine County Attorney Brian Goettl, of Conservativeedge.com, who asked in a headline: “What does LuAllen know about tourism?”

In the blog report, Goettl goes on to ask, “What does LuAllen know about tourism or marketing? What does her audit staff know about it? I would venture to say very little … LuAllen has no business making such pronouncements unless she can demonstrate her competence in the area or show that she relied on competent experts.”

Well. Luallen, a Democrat, points out that she served as tourism secretary under former Gov. Brereton Jones and continued to work on tourism projects as executive cabinet secretary under former Gov. Paul Patton.

During her time in those two roles, the state expanded or built convention centers in Louisville and Northern Kentucky, passed a $100 million bond issue to upgrade state parks and saw the private development of numerous attractions, including the Newport Aquarium, Louisville’s 4th Street Live and Kentucky Speedway, which she said were partly the result of changes she and the administrations she worked for sought in state law.

“The record is there,” she said. “I have a strong background in marketing, in economic development and in tourism and that was one reason we looked at this issue.”

Goettl said in an interview that he would like to review Luallen’s record as tourism secretary more closely before determining whether she and her office are qualified to make such recommendations.

The doctoring is in

Last week state Republican Chairman Steve Robertson said that doctoring photos is fair game in the governor’s race between Gov. Ernie Fletcher and his Democratic opponent, former Lt. Gov. Steve Beshear.

In its first salvo, the party unveiled brochures that have Beshear’s head Photoshopped onto a body wearing a white blazer, a white, open-collar shirt and a necklace, leaning against a roulette table and holding a glass of what looks to be white wine.

“Easy Money Steve” they call him because of his proposal to bring casino gambling, and $500 million annually in revenue, to Kentucky.

But we were a bit surprised by Democratic Party Chairman Jonathan Miller’s response condemning the practice. We figured the Democrats would view the Republican attack as tacit approval for such shenanigans if they chose to do the same.

If you were running Beshear’s campaign, how would you doctor a photo of Fletcher? And if you were running Fletcher’s campaign, how would you follow up the “Easy Money Steve” brochure?

E-mail me at jgerth@courier-journal.com, and we may run some of your responses in upcoming weeks.

Poll dancing

Last week we led with a couple of items about a poll by the Lexington public relations firm of Preston-Osborne, which drew questions on the Courier-Journal Web site from some readers who wondered if we had been “snookered.”

The poll, commissioned by The Lane Report, a Lexington business journal, dealt with issues ranging from the governor’s race to casino gaming and seemed to give Democratic gubernatorial nominee Steve Beshear an edge on several fronts.

The basic argument that we had been “snookered” is that Preston-Osborne was founded by Tommy Preston, a longtime friend of Beshear, and the firm also has a contract to do public relations work with the Kentucky Equine Education Project, which supports casinos.

The fact of the matter is that Preston sold his interest in the firm to Phil Osborne in 1997 and hasn’t been involved in the company since (although he and Osborne are friends and still talk regularly). As far as the KEEP connection, Osborne notes that if he fudged numbers for one client to benefit another, he wouldn’t be in business very long.

I don’t doubt he’s correct on that. But what ultimately led us to run the Lane Report results was the fact that the numbers were right in line with other polling data we’ve seen, which gives them some measure of reliability.
Outta here

I’ll be taking some much-needed vacation over the next two weeks. The column should return Sept. 10 but keep the cards and letters coming. I’ll be checking e-mails while I’m away.

Justice Breyer: Here’s what bigot, hate-monger KY State Rep. Stan Lee (R) and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Have in Common

Matt Gunterman August 13th, 2007

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer offers us a new paradigm for looking at the world, one quite different from President George W. Bush’s “you’re with us or against us,” or his “axis of evil,” or even outside the realm of that bogeyman “Islamofascism.”

Yes, Breyer’s suggestion is rather asymmetrical in nature and design; he describes a phenomenon that transcends national boundaries and nationalism.

It’s an assault on reason; it’s a way of looking at the world that places fundamentalist Christian bigots and hate-mongers, like State Representative Stan Lee (R), who would love nothing more than to stuff his narrow brand of religion down the throats of all Kentuckians, with radical Islamic bigots and hate-mongers, like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?).

I think it explains the state of things rather well.

From ThinkProgress:

Breyer sees assault on reason.

The Supreme Court’s most recent term was a difficult one, Justice Stephen Breyer said Saturday, because he found himself on the losing end of several key cases. After the 9/11, attacks, Breyer said: “I began to see that the true division of importance in the world is not between different countries. The important division is between those who are committed to reason, to working out things, to understanding other people, to peaceful resolution of their differences … and those who don’t think that.”

Republican Congressman: non-Christians in Congress “not what was envisioned by the Founding Fathers”

Matt Gunterman August 10th, 2007

I bet Kentucky State Representative and Republican attorney general candidate Stan Lee, a bigot and hate-monger of the first order, considers U.S. Representative Bill Sali (R-ID) a man after his own heart.

Via ThinkProgress:

Rep. Bill Sali: Religious Diversity In Congress ‘Was Not Envisioned By The Founding Fathers’

When Idaho State Rep. Bill Sali was running for Congress in 2006, Vice President Cheney visited his state and said, “Bill is ready to make a difference in Washington, and he’s going to be the kind of Congressman who will make you proud.” Now-Congressman Bill Sali (R-ID) is demonstrating his worth by criticizing the new religious diversity embodied in the 110th Congress:

We have not only a Hindu prayer being offered in the Senate, we have a Muslim member of the House of Representatives now, Keith Ellison from Minnesota. Those are changes — and they are not what was envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

Really? Sali may want to take a peek at Article VI of the Constitution, which notes that there is no religious test for public office:

[...]

Sali’s not alone in his bigotry. In Dec. 2006, shortly after Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) was elected as the first Muslim congressman, Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) warned that “American citizens” need to “wake up” or “there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office.”

Last month, protestors belonging to the Christian Right anti-abortion group Operation Save America loudly interrupted the first Hindu prayer delivered in the Senate. Sali said that when a Hindu prayer is offered, it “creates problems for the longevity of this country.”

Alessi offers most astute Fancy Farm coverage

Matt Gunterman August 6th, 2007

In today’s installment of his column Political Notebook, the Herald-Leader’s Ryan Alessi offers what in my opinion has thus far been the most astute coverage to come out of the MSM.

He very accurately notes that the Republicans are suffering on two fronts in this campaign: lack of unity and lack of leadership.

On unity, let’s compare the Democrats with the Republicans. First, the centerpiece of the Democratic party camp site featured a giant banner that had all the candidates’ names on it, and every candidate had a team of people in the area handing out stickers and literature. The Republican party camp site, on the other hand — which was right next door to the Democrats — was almost exclusively graced with Fletcher signs. There were no visual signs of unity for the Republicans.

Second, every Democratic candidate stayed on the stage until the end of the event when all the speeches were done. Senator Mitch McConnell (R) was first to bail on the Republicans; he got out of dodge as soon as possible. Governor Ernie Fletcher similarly abandoned ship soon after he was done speaking. Fletcher also, according to Alessi, had no comment on his runningmate’s churlish and humiliating performance. Seriously, folks, it was so bad, I’m sure even the Republicans were having second thoughts about putting this joker Robbie Rudolph in office.

Third, the Republican supporters of the various candidates didn’t even stand together. The Fletcher support was centered in the traditionally Republican corner. The Trey Grayson troop of bigots and homophobes stayed in the back with the labor union guys and gals (skinny little young Republicans that they largely were, they also got bumped around quite a bit by the far more fit and muscular men and women with organized labor. Representative Stan Lee (R) had no support aside from what he brought with him. He had no signs and only a few more stickers. No-one wants to touch the crazy fundamentalist Christian or his “The End Is Near” campaign for attorney general. Agricultural Commissioner Richie Farmer (R) stayed away from the whole mess. He’s quite possible the only Republican who will win reelection this November.

The lack of leadership level runs several layers deep. Senator Mitch McConnell is gradually failing as Senate Minority Leader. He has small victories here and there, but the general trend is that he’s alienating his #2 Trent Lott and his caucus because he’s unable to provide them leadership now that the thing most occupying his mind and his energies is his own political survival.

Alessi offers the most stunning example of Fletcher’s failed leadership in the article below. Richie Farmer is taking the lead on rural health care. Our Republican-led state government is that disfunctional, ladies and gentlemen: the agricultural commissioner is having to bear the burden of addressing pressing issues because the other Republicans are simply too consumed with political calculation for their own survival.

The end result: there is little enthusiasm on among Kentucky Republicans leading into the November election. Fancy Farm was a chance to get themselves pumped up, but it only proved to them very evidently how divided and outnumbered they are.

Mitch McConnell makes the comment in Alessi’s piece that the Republicans were better organized. It’s true, but only because it’s much easier to organize a few hundred Republican activists versus a few thousand Democrats.

Fletcher-McConnell: Next phase
By Ryan Alessi

MAYFIELD –A subplot to watch during this fall’s campaign will be how the patchwork relationship between Gov. Ernie Fletcher and U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell holds up.

Much is at stake for both Kentucky Republican officials. Fletcher is seeking another four-year term. And McConnell, who is up for re-election next year, risks facing a more powerful, strongly backed Democratic opponent in 2008 if that party takes control of the governor’s office.

In public, McConnell and Fletcher shrug off suggestions that animosity or frustration exists between them.

“Mitch is campaigning with us. We’re glad to have his help,” Fletcher said in a manner-of-fact tone Saturday after the Graves County Republican breakfast in Mayfield.

When pressed on what McConnell’s role will be in the campaign, Fletcher gave few details. He acknowledged that he would take advice from the state’s senior U.S. senator but quickly added that he talks “to all of the federal delegation quite a bit.”

On the topic of whether McConnell — a famously prolific fund-raiser — will be spearheading efforts to collect bucket loads of national donations, Fletcher was equally vague.

“I’d welcome any help that anyone can give with raising money,” the governor said. “I’m sure he will.”

Fletcher noted that McConnell introduced him during a July 17 fund-raising event for the Republican Governors’ Association in Washington, which Fletcher said brought in “several hundred thousand dollars.”

The RGA is expected to buy TV advertisements for Fletcher this fall. Fletcher didn’t mention that McConnell is hosting two major fund-raisers for him in Lexington and Louisville this month. The invitations announce him as the “special guest,” before listing dozens of co-sponsors who already have pledged $1,000 checks.

Among the 135 names on the list for the Aug. 28 event at the Lexington home of Dr. Russell and Jill Travis is Larry Forgy, a former GOP gubernatorial candidate and ardent Fletcher supporter who has criticized McConnell for not sticking up for the governor.

Forgy, who hasn’t ruled out challenging McConnell in a primary next spring, said he’s waiting to see what McConnell will do to promote Fletcher this fall, especially in the senator’s hometown.

“He can be very helpful in Louisville,” Forgy said.

In Louisville, 107 sponsors have signed up for the Aug. 23 event at the home of businessman Todd Blue.

McConnell arrived late to Fancy Farm on Saturday after a hectic and exhausting finish of business in the U.S. Senate last week. He took a few sharp jabs at Fletcher’s Democratic opponent, Steve Beshear, whom he beat handily in the 1996 Senate race.

But McConnell gave a less inspired speech than he had at previous Fancy Farm picnics, partly because he allowed the fired-up crowd to interrupt him often.

After the speeches, the senator offered a pro-Fletcher assessment of the day. “The crowd was better organized on the governor’s side. I think this is an extremely sharp operation,” he said.

McConnell spent much of 2005 and 2006 avoiding talking about Fletcher as the governor’s political troubles boiled over. Although the investigation into improper state hirings led to indictments, including three misdemeanor charges against Fletcher, McConnell’s comments to reporters were little more than the obvious: that Fletcher was going through hard times.

McConnell stayed out of the spring’s GOP primary, saying only that he would support the eventual nominee. The senator and his camp didn’t offer any hints that they were behind Fletcher the way they did during the 2003 primary.

Beshear chose to highlight the on-again, off-again McConnell-Fletcher relationship as the opening line of his Fancy Farm remarks.

“It only took you a year, but I’m glad you finally remembered Ernie’s name,” Beshear said to McConnell.

Difference in opinions

Agriculture Commissioner Richie Farmer is forming a rural health care committee to look at the availability of medical treatment and insurance in smaller Kentucky communities.

“We know there are some projects already out there,” Farmer said. “What we want to do is take advantage of that and see what is working and what will work” in rural Kentucky.

Dr. Kevin Kavanagh, a Somerset physician and chairman of the Republican Party in Pulaski County, said policies to help increase health coverage outside of the bigger cities are crucial. He said he’s been disappointed in the lack of emphasis state officials — including Fletcher, who is a doctor — have put on it.

The Fletcher administration’s strides in health care have mostly come through restructuring Medicaid and stemming its financial bleeding, passing a pilot program to encourage small businesses to provide workers with insurance.

But Kavanagh said he’s frustrated that the administration has tightened regulations to make it more difficult for new hospitals to be built and hasn’t been receptive to critics and whistle blowers inside the public health system.

For those reasons, Kavanagh said, he’s stepping down this week as Pulaski County GOP chairman.

“I don’t feel I can adequately lead the party to champion his re-election,” he said.

He then suggested that Fletcher could learn from Farmer, a former University of Kentucky basketball guard.

“That is a testament to how bad the governor is doing in health care when the agriculture commissioner has to form an ad hoc committee,” he said.

FEAR THE STACHE YOUTUBE VIDEO

Jim Pence August 6th, 2007

A little Stan Lee fun, enjoy.

My E-Mail to the KY GOP

Joe Sonka July 21st, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

In response to the top three news items on the KY GOP’s website, I was forced to send them a friendly letter.

Item #1- They cite the 2 week old poll showing Beshear and Fletcher in a close race, which "shows" that Fletcher’s "leadership" in calling for the special session gave him a huge bump in the polls.

Item #2- They post an absolutely hilarious letter from Ned Flanders Stan Lee to his opponent Jack Conway, asking him to oppose Beshear gaming expansion, or as Ned Stan puts it, "his desire to see casinos in every county across the commonwealth". Basically, he cites studies showing that casinos lead to rape, robbery, drugs, aggravated assault, embezzlement, prostitution, divorce, motor vehicle theft, murder, suicide and abortions. Wow! But he buries the lead: “In 2002, the Indiana Gaming Commission fined the Belterra Casino $2.2 million for providing prostitutes to its customers. As part of the investigation into the prostitution scandal, it was reported that casino owners would send female ‘player development managers’ into surrounding communities to lure gentlemen back to the casino boats. One such female casino employee even stated that she was told to go to the popular bars and nightclubs in Lexington and pick up gentlemen to bring back to the casino.” Oh my.

Item #3: They post a column from right-wing nutjob Hugh Hewitt, in which he lavishes praise on McConnell for the filibuster to enable Bush’s Iraq policy.

My response:

Some comments on the three top stories on your website right now:

#1: I see that you posted the poll that showed the Governor’s race as being tight 2 weeks ago, just wondering why you haven’t posted the new SUSA poll showing Beshear stomping Fletcher? Perhaps the internet tubes are clogged and you haven’t received those yet. If so, I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news.

#2: Is it wrong to ask about the causal linkage of casinos with rape and divorce? I’d be really interested to hear this explanation, especially from Ned Stan himself. And as far as the attractive women that go to bars in Lexington to pick up men: I need the names of the bars, Ned Stan. The NAMES, damnit!. Don’t Bogart this info just because you’re not interested, share the wealth.

#3: Additionally, I am glad that you finally found one conservative pundit that actually isn’t ashamed of Mitch McConnell. I know that this has been really difficult to find. I do like the fact that he’s praising Mitch for wrapping the Iraq anchor around the GOP’s neck too, it’s a nice touch.

All the best,
Joe

Hey, Democrats! I have a solution to the problem State Senator David Williams has with Fancy Farm

Matt Gunterman July 16th, 2007

As has been reported since the announcement that he would emcee the event (most recently by the Courier-Journal’s Joseph Gerth), State Senate President David Williams (R) has a problem with the Fancy Farm picnic: Republicans get heckled too much for his taste.

Senator David Williams: “I have all the hot air Fancy Farm needs in 2007″

Well, folks, I have a solution to David Williams’ dilemma.

My first Fancy Farm picnic was 1992 (I was 15 at the time), when soon-to-be Vice President Al Gore (D) landed dramatically by helicopter behind the platform (there was no shelter to block the sky — and elements — back then) and gave what I remember to be a rather rousing speech.

The only heckler at the entire event was a grotesquely fat Republican who perched himself on the bottom rung of one of the metal bleachers, and the only person he heckled was then Senator Wendell H. Ford (D) with the standard “Rusty old Ford” taunt, which he yelled ad nauseum.

Otherwise, Fancy Farm was rather peaceful and a little playful, to my memory: it was largely without Republicans or a Republican presence. It was a time when Democrats got together to celebrate all that they’d accomplished for Kentucky.

My next Fancy Farm was 1995 during the heated gubernatorial race between Paul Patton (D) and Larry Forgy (R) in the shadow of the “Republican Revolution” of 1994. The armies of Republican trolls (they would bus in militant, troglodyte Young Republicans) had flooded the place by then, and that was also the year — if you’ll recall — that freshman Congressman Ed Whitfield (R) physically assaulted a man in the audience. The Republicans were full of themselves, and they were violent.

How times have changed. Now that the Republicans have had the wind knocked out of their sails, they suddenly want everybody to play nice.

I have a suggestion: let’s return Fancy Farm to its happier, more productive times by removing the Republicans. Their presence in force was what started the whole mess that Williams is complaining about.

I doubt that the KY GOP will abandon the picnic voluntarily, so we’ll have to forcibly remove them: by voting them out at the ballot box.

PS: David, if you expect our side to behave at Fancy Farm, then you’ll have to make sure that miserable excuse of a human being and proud bigot Rep. Stan Lee (R) stays off the stage.

STAN LEE KENTUCKY’S OWN NED FLANDERS YOUTUBE VIDEO.

Jim Pence July 8th, 2007

Let the Judge see what you got.

[From Matt]:

I’d like to thank Jim for another brilliant video. Even though The Simpson’s Ned Flanders is a generally lovable, if misguided, figure, I think the power of comparison here between the two is that the politics of State Representative Stan Lee (R) are cartoonish, and while being cartoonish is quite alright if you’re a cartoon, it’s bad when you’re the Republican nominee for attorney general.

I’m always amazed at how people like Stan Lee and his analogue in bigotry in the State Senate, Richard “Dick” Roeding, can be so oblivious to this nation’s history to the extent that they are. It’s all well and good to study the ins-and-outs of the book of Genesis as much as they do, but I think a man should seek for some balance and might want to pick up a book that details something slightly more recent on the cosmic time line. Say, the 18th through 20th centuries in the West would be a start.

Of the two, Senator Roeding is the worst offender in ignorance. Why? Let me show you how little historical perspective the man has. If you check Roeding’s biography on his website (and I’m not giving it the dignity of linking to it; you’ll just have to google it), you will notice that he is an active Catholic. And, with a name like Roeding, I can only imagine he, like me, is of Teutonic extraction.

Now, if you will recall, German Catholics and Catholics more generally were terribly unwelcome in this nation not even a century ago. I’m sure there were plenty of Kentuckians back in the day warning about letting the Catholic hordes into the commonwealth. I’m sure there were plenty of people who expressed sentiments about Catholics similar to what Roeding had to say about gays and lesbians.

You see, when the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville announced that they were going to extend benefits to domestic partners, a category that would include same-sex partners, and that they were doing this to attract the best-of-the-best in academia and be competitive as institutions of higher learning, Roeding responded, “I don’t want to entice any of those people [gays and lesbians] into our state. Those are the wrong kind of people.”

Can you imagine a man so detached from historical perspective? Roeding truly is an example of a man who’s educated but lacks the power of mind to be intelligent.


* * * * *

Stan Lee’s Hate-Fundraiser-Session a Goner

Joe Sonka July 6th, 2007

Well, the gratuitously calculating government welfare special session called by Gov. Ernie Fletcher fortunately appears to be dead and gone. Especially displeased must be the opportunist homophobe Stan Lee, who would have loved to try to block UK and UL’s domestic partnership benefits. Stan was surely hoping to give rousing floor speeches and press releases about how the gays were trying to destroy marriage and corrupt our youth with their filthy ways. Following that, he would have opened up the coffers to every fundamentalist extremist/gay hater in the state, rallying them to fight Teh Gay behind their mustached crusader.

Fortunately, the House Democrats stood their ground and nixed the Peabody-Gov’t welfare session. And Ned Flanders will have to find some creative new way to fleece the fundies of their money.

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Hebert: House Democrats will say “No” to welfare for Republican politicians

Matt Gunterman July 4th, 2007

WHAS political reporter Mark Hebert is reporting that Kentucky Democratic House leaders — in a bold and principled move — will adjourn the House on Thursday before Governor Ernie Fletcher’s (R) superfluous Special Session of the General Assembly kicks off.

In doing so, they will save the taxpayers of Kentucky $60,000 a day and deprive Frankfort Republicans of hundreds of thousands of dollars in political welfare payments.

I hear Representative and Attorney General candidate Stan Lee (R) is particularly upset because he was going to use all the extra money he’d make not only to prop up his flailing November campaign, but to take his Sunday School class to Kentucky’s brand-new, state-of-the-fundie-arts Creation Museum.

Elizabeth Edwards Rocks Lexington (and chats with Jim and Joe!)

Joe Sonka July 2nd, 2007

I’m not really sure how many supporters John Edwards had in Lexington on Friday morning, but I know that he has a lot more now. The line on John Edwards that is making the rounds is that his best asset in the campaign to win the presidency is not his humble Southern background, health-care platform or charm, but his wife, Elizabeth Edwards. After watching her performance during Friday’s Small Change for Big Change event in Lexington, I think that statement isn’t too far off base.

Elizabeth Edwards performed a rather spectacular hour+ Q & A session with over 200 contributors, fans, and potential voters. And due to the online outreach efforts of the Edwards campaign (thanks to Tracy and Amy, via DMKY’s Shawn Dixon) and the southern charm of DMKY’s own Jim Pence, Jim and I were able speak with Elizabeth face to face for roughly 10 minutes before her public Q & A session.

Though the Edwards staff thought we had a decent chance of chatting with her for a couple of minutes, shortly after we entered the venue and set up our cameras (Jim and fellow film guru Erica), we were told that there was no time for an interview. After Jim disappeared for a few minutes to chat up the Edwards folks, he came back saying that she might be doing a short “meet and greet” with some people.

“What’s a meet and greet?”

“I’m not sure”

“I’ve never been to a meet and greet”

“Yea, me neither”

Ten minutes later, Jim pulled me backstage and one of the staff stopped us and asked if we were the guys from DitchMitchKY and told us that we could speak with Mrs. Edwards in a few minutes, but not on camera or on tape. So while all of the slick, dolled up TV reporters waited for Elizabeth to come out for the Q & A, the blogger in ratty Chuck Taylors and ripped pants, and the hillbilly with the Acapulco shirt were whisked upstairs to meet her.

Continue Reading »

The Bigot Writes an Editorial

Joe Sonka June 25th, 2007

Our favorite mustached bigot writes an editorial in the Courier-Journal about how domestic partner benefits will destroy, I say DESTROY traditional marriage.

I think I’ve finally figured this out, correct me if I’m off base. We have Stan Lee, who obviously has had some issues growing up about his sexuality. In order to defend himself from anyone who might catch on to his sexual confusion, he puts on a lifelong front of virulent hatred of homosexuals, so that no one will question his hetero manliness. But why this fear of something as innocuous as health benefits for domestic partners? As Ned says, the universities are trying to "systematically dismantle marriage in our society". I think what Ned fears is that sexually ambiguous married folk like himself, when presented with the public and visible acceptance of homosexual couples, will be unable to resist their urges. Therefore, waves of such men will be forced to divorce their wives, now presented with the option to follow their repressed sexual urges.

Well, at least that’s the only explanation that makes sense to me. Maybe I’m wrong. That, or he’s just a crude, hateful and immoral politician that is making political gain by tapping into hatred of unpopular people.

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Religious fundamentalists are destroying the nation’s economic competitive edge

Matt Gunterman June 24th, 2007

The Courier-Journal ran an excellent editorial this Sunday that asked all the thinking fiscal conservatives who have aligned themselves with the Kentucky GOP in recent years to seriously reconsider their allegiance to and alliance with the Republican party’s fanatical social conservatives and religious fundamentalists.

There are about four billion people on this planet who aren’t Christian, and the nations their building aren’t ones that obsess about the Second Coming of Christ.

I mean, we have a man — Representative Stan Lee (R) — who’s running for attorney general of this state who wants to make Christianity the official religion of the land, who wants to teach Creationism in our schools as “science,” and whose personal legislative agenda is to stamp out homosexuality and homosexuals in Kentucky.

People like Stan Lee and all the people who follow his sort of creed are sapping this nation of the competitive edge it will need to survive and prosper in the 21st century.

We aren’t living in a global vacuum. Other nations aren’t going to be obsessed with building “Christian paradise,” and will instead be focused on building institutions of learning that produce top scholars and scientists and on creating nimble economies to rival our own.

In truth, people like hate-monger Stan Lee believe the nation’s calling is to prepare for the End Times. I have no problem with people believing their religion and applying its tenets to their own lives, but it’s absolute crazy talk to say it should be something the rest of the nation should be concerned about.

Let’s hope the fiscal conservatives do take a stand against the delusional religious fanatics in the GOP.

The GOP’s choice

Today, Kentucky Republicans are faced with a clear choice: What kind of party — and what kind of people — do they want to be?

Do the party’s solid businessmen and women really want to follow its social-conservative wing into a university-bashing battle over domestic partner benefits?

How comfortable can they be contributing their time, money and good names to Ernie Fletcher’s reelection campaign, now that his handpicked state party chairman has made it clear that a big part of their strategy will be to throw red meat to the anti-gay crowd?

Does that seem like an exaggeration? It’s not.

GOP chairman Steve Robertson had been on the job for less than three weeks before — as his first public act — he sent out an infantile opinion piece to newspapers, all but calling two Democratic candidates gay and inciting anti-academic hysteria over the issue of domestic partner benefits.

Certainly these are not the issues or tactics that education-minded, New Economy-building Republicans want to embrace. Kentucky ranks near the bottom in too many areas, and most Republicans no doubt long to focus not on keeping it there, but on making it a more educated, competitive and prosperous place.

Need proof? The decision to offer modest benefits to the unmarried partners of University of Louisville and University of Kentucky employees was made by the prominent business people, many of them Republicans, who make up their boards.

Go to the universities’ Websites and look at the names. They are CEOs, bankers, developers, a former director of the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce. Gov. Fletcher himself appointed about half.

These people — not left-wing radicals — decided what our universities need to be competitive.

As former Jefferson County Republican Party chairman Bill Stone, a U of L trustee, said the day that board voted 14-1 to offer domestic partner benefits, “This is not an endorsement of gay marriage or any of the other lightning issues. This is simply a recognition that people are people. You only restrict your opportunities for greatness when you restrict your opportunities to attract all kinds of folks.”

Domestic partner benefits will make a difference to a very small number of university employees. But if it helps attract, say, an Aaron Copland to a music department or a Gore Vidal to a writing program, that helps Kentucky kids.

The business wing of the GOP knows this. It’s time for them to make themselves heard. No — it’s past time.

If they let the social conservatives dominate this higher education issue, what will be next? Science curricula acceptable to the creationist crowd?

UK Amends Benefits Plan for Domestic Partners

Joe Sonka June 18th, 2007

In order to comply with the Kentucky constitution, UK has creatively amended its plans to offer Domestic Partner Coverage. Under the new plan, a UK employee may extend coverage to one qualifying adult and/or children in their household. Such a broad definition should comply with AG Stumbo’s earlier decision.

The full text of UK’s news release is here.

And that sound you hear? That’s Stan Lee’s head exploding.

(h/t Sandlestraps)

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Church…..and……State

Joe Sonka June 5th, 2007

The Bowling Green Daily Post has a wingnut editorial up demanding that the 10 Commandments immediately be put up on Capitol grounds. Otherwise, I’m guessing that evil spirits will work their way into the capitol building and make the legislators start worshiping Satan and performing human sacrifice rituals and gay orgies. Or even start (gasp) lying, taking bribes and cheating on their wives. Yes, some good ole time religion in the Capitol will save us from this.

And who joins the BG Daily News in this passioned, urgent plea?

Ned Flanders, of course. Says Stan Lee, “The General Assembly spoke on the issue. The governor signed the bill. Whoever is charged with doing this needs to be working post haste.”

Don’t make Ned Flanders angry. You won’t like him when he’s angry.

How soon before Stan Lee proposes legislation to build a giant crucifix on the House floor?

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Good News on UK Domestic Partner Benefits

Joe Sonka June 5th, 2007

Aurthur Leonard at New York Law School has an excellent discussion concerning the recent AG opinion on the compatibility of UK and UL’s domestic partnership benefits with 2004’s horrific Marriage Amendment to the KY constitution. The good news is that while the benefits appear unconstitutional, the assistant AG James Herrick states that UK and UL would only have to slightly alter the wording of the benefits plan to make it constitutional.

KY Rep. and AG candidate Stan Lee, of course, freaked out. He requested the opinion in the first place and responded that the expansion of eligibility for benefits “could be a tremendous waste of resources”.

Right.

What he meant to say was “I have doubts about my own sexuality and therefore I put up an over-dramatic front of homophobia” “I hate gay people”.

I wonder how Mitch feels about all this.

Nooooo…I didn’t mean that.

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

In 20 years, we’ll look at Rep. Stan Lee as this kind of idiot, too

Matt Gunterman June 5th, 2007

The Courier-Journal published the text from the Loving v. Virginia 1967 Supreme Court decision that struck down laws banning interracial marriage. They also have a nice op-ed from Kermit Roosevelt that essentially argues that same-sex marriage is coming, and society will adapt, and that in the future society will look back on opposition to same-sex marriage and wonder how people today could have been so blindly bigoted.

And, that’s how it will be. It doesn’t take an historian to figure it out. Of course, hate-monger Representative Stan Lee (R) is probably holding out for the Rapture before that time has passed.

In reading the text of the Court’s decision, I couldn’t help but find the paragraph that I’ve emboldened below strikingly familiar to something that Stan Lee would utter.

[...]

In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. Shortly after their marriage, the Lovings returned to Virginia and established their marital abode in Caroline County. At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years. He stated in an opinion that:

“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”

[...]

We have to start calling out nutters like Stan Lee with increasing frequency. These sorts of people need to be socially and culturally marginalized, or we’ll never be rid of their bigotry that’s a plague on our nation that’s holding us back, intellectually and scientifically.

Is Rep. Stan Lee’s faith, which he says guides him in his career and campaign for attorney general, anti-Catholic?

Matt Gunterman May 30th, 2007

First off, can anyone tell me why Representative Stan Lee’s campaign website for attorney general is hosted on Representative Kevin D. Bratcher’s personal website: http://www.bratcher.cc/stan_lee.htm?

Second, Stan Lee declares all over this campaign website that, in his own words, he first and foremost “is guided by his faith” and that he “is honored to serve as an Elder at his church for over 10 years,” and that church is Hill-n-Dale Christian Church in Lexington.

So, since Lee has admitted that his faith will be at the very center of what guides him as attorney general if he should win, I think we have a vested interest as concerned citizens and voters to know something more about that faith.

Also, since Lee is an authoritative leader in that congregation, what is said in the pulpit there bears his mark of approval. If it didn’t, he could certainly do something about it because he’s in a position to do so.

I submit to you excerpts from a Sunday, March 25, 2007 sermon entitled “When God Calls Your Name,” preached by Hill-n-Dale Christian Church senior minister Phil Roberts. The audio is here.

In this sermon, Roberts disparages a pilgrimage site in the state of Georgia and accuses those behind it of being motivated by “profit” and not faith. Who’s behind it? An organization that calls itself Our Loving Mother’s Children. Their website, which Roberts references in his sermon, states that the organization “and its volunteers are the heirs of a long tradition of people who believe that, from time to time, God acts in unique and miraculous ways.”

You are asked to donate money on the website, but it’s to build a new Catholic church, and last time I looked that’s not a terribly profitable enterprise, quite frankly.

Here’s Roberts’ own words from 10:15-11:16 on the audio that’s linked above. The “Lisa” he references is Roberts’ wife:

[...]

Lisa here, her hometown is Conyers, Georgia. It’s a nice little town. Not terribly exciting, but a nice town, uh, but if you were to go to a website called conyers.org here’s what you’d read about Conyers, Georgia.

It says, “Conyers is where the Blessed Mother appeared 49 times on the 13th of the month from 1990 to 1998.”

1998, incidentally, is when the IRS started to crack down a little bit.

It says, “Well over a million pilgrims have visited the site, with several gatherings estimated at over 100,000. Conyers is a holy site where untold numbers have experienced healing, conversion and a deeper relationship with Christ and Our Loving Mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary.”

Well, God is in the business of calling people and making himself known, but maybe not like that.

And you know, frankly, many non-believing people have been turned off by these hard-to-believe God sightings that usually center around turning a profit. And so many of them as a result have drawn the opposite conclusion that God just doesn’t speak at all in today’s world.

[…]

What I think’s really funny is that Roberts disparages believers for seeing visions and manifestations of God, but undoubtedly he’s wholly fine with God speaking to his own congregation. I guess seeing things makes you crazy, but only hearing things makes you full of the faith. See below (this begins at 18:42 on the audio):

Can you picture God saying “Hill-n-Dale! Hill-n-Dale!” I mean isn’t it amazing to look back over the last 26 years and think that along the way God has been saying with enthusiasm the name of this church and calling out for a response. And you know, for a church as well as for individuals, we’ve got two options there. One is, we can say will you leave me alone I’m just trying to get some sleep here, or we can say speak Lord, for your servants are listening.

My recommendation: get more sleep.

Is Representative Stan Lee qualified to be an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church?

Matt Gunterman May 30th, 2007

Republican State Representative Stan Lee is one of the most freakishly superstitious and comically unreasoned people in the legislature.

Mark Nickolas has well documented this fact for some time now at the Bluegrass Report. For a good primer on the subject, see “The Frightening Fanaticism Of Attorney General Candidate Stan Lee (R).”

Also of interest is Media Czech’s take on Lee’s strange, out-of-the-mainstream behavior in his rather humorous “Atheist Voting Guide to Fall 2007 KY Elections.”

I must say, if you haven’t read this account of Stan Lee telling perfect strangers in his office about the impending arrival of the End Times, then you must read it. It’s crazy talk from the man.

Now, pretty much all of Stan Lee’s campaign literature mentions that he is an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church in Lexington.

I am, in fact, a practicing Campbellite just like Stan Lee (only I’m of the Church of Christ persuasion, like Jody Richards, but I’m probably far more liberal in my theology than Richards, but I might be wrong on that, but I’m probably not).

And, as a fellow Campbellite, I know all about elders of the church and their qualifications (elders are also called bishops, and they are appointed by and from within the various independent congregations). Those qualifications are spelled out in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and they are:

1 Timothy 3:1-7

1: This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
2: A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3: Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
4: One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5: (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
6: Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
7: Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Now, Stan Lee and people who think like him believe that they can use their interpretations of the scriptures in the political process to dictate how I can live out my own secular life.

I wholeheartedly agree that Stan Lee and his fellow elders are within their rights to regulate their own congregation via those interpretations. In fact, if I were a member of Hill-n-Dale Christian Church, the eldership there would be more than welcome to disfellowship me; I would wear the mark with pride.

Where Stan Lee and his posse are wrong is that those beliefs have any business dictating the political and civil rights of the American citizenry. For example, two secular issues that Stan Lee seems to think are the business of his superstition are reproductive rights and same-sex marriage.

So, I say let’s reverse the flow. Let’s use the scriptures to judge Stan Lee and see if he’s qualified to be an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church. Lee uses his status as an elder in his campaign, so it’s entirely fair game.

Stan Lee is unqualified to be an elder of the church, a shepherd of the flock, a bishop of the bride of Christ because the public record shows that his temperament is not sober, he is not of good behavior, he is not given to hospitality, is impatient, is an argumentative brawler, and he most certainly does not have a good report with those of us who are without.

For more on the qualifications of elders, see this handy little website.