Archive for the 'SCHIP' Category

Mitch gives $70,000,000 to millionaire horse owners

Joe Sonka May 14th, 2008

(crossposted at B&P)

There is no greater advocate of handing out pork in return for political favors than Senator Mitch McConnell.

And it appears that Mitch McConnell has outdone himself again in political cronyism.

While Mitch McConnell is busy filibustering to stop the expansion of health care for poor families, he has finally found a constituency that is worthy of our tax dollars.

Millionaire thoroughbred owners.

Seriously.

This week, Congress is expected to take up a $300 billion farm bill, which President Bush has vowed to veto. The AP reports that the bill “contains something for everyone” — including the following important project tucked within the massive bill:

A tax break for horse owners was included by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Politico’s Crypt explains:

The measure would essentially allow race horse owners — who pay millions for Triple Crown contenders — to write down their investment over four years. … Senate aides say it will cost between $60 million and $70 million.

Shocking, eh?

Well, if sick kids can’t get the health care they need, at least our millionaires will be able to cover all of their thoroughbreds’ veterinarian bills. After all, we need to have our priorities in order, right Mitch?

Anyway, a review:

Covering sick kids from poor families = socialism

Giving $70 million in tax breaks to millionaires = The American Way

And once more, I can’t wait to see Mitch “Porky” McConnell and John “Pork-Intolerant” McCain on the same stage campaigning this year. I will literally pay money to see that uber-awkwardness.

Bush Administration: Law-Breakers

Terri Whitehouse April 21st, 2008

So says the New York Times:

The Bush administration violated federal law last year when it restricted states’ ability to provide health insurance to children of middle-income families, and its new policy is therefore unenforceable, lawyers from the Government Accountability Office said Friday.

And I think it’s pretty clear what is at the heart of the matter:

The letter told states what steps they needed to take to be sure the children’s health program would not displace or “crowd out” private coverage under group health plans. The White House cited the policy as a justification for rejecting a proposal by New York State to cover 70,000 additional youngsters.

Remember back when Sen. Mitch McConnell pretended to give a flip about middle income families? That dog don’t hunt. Aren’t you ready to DITCH MITCH?!?!

(h/t: Feministe)

MCCONNELLISM AT WORK!!!!!!!

Jim Pence February 4th, 2008

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect
Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the
common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings
of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of America.
Article. I.
Section. 1. All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a
Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House
of Representatives.
Section. 2. The House of Representatives shall be composed of Members
chosen every second Year by the People of the several States, and the
Electors in each State shall have the Qualifications requisite for
Electors of the most numerous Branch of the State Legislature.
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the
Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United
States
, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that
State in which he shall be chosen.

McConnellism At Work:
According to some sources Ed. Whitfield is not an inhabitant of Kentucky and was not when he was elected, in 2006. If that is the case then Ed. Whitfield lied when he took his oath of office, to uphold the Constitution Of The United States. If in fact Ed. Whitfield was not an inhabitant of Kentucky when he was elected in 2006, he should not have been allowed to take the oath of office!!!
Does, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen mean that Ed Whitfield has to be an inhabitant of Kentucky only on election night? Who knows, but it’s playing fast and loose with the law to interpret it that way. Of course when a person of power and means like Ed Whitfield wants to play fast and loose with the law anything is possible. It sure would be nice if someone other than bloggers would look into this.
We all know where Ed Whitfield’s opponent, Heather Ryan lives and it’s not in California, Virginia, or West Virginia and she won’t be found taking trips, at the tax payers expense, She’ll be right here in Kentucky fighting for seniors and children.
Click here to view Ed Whitfield’s personal finances and here to see who Ed Whitfield really represents.

A Word About McConnell’s Poll Numbers

Terri Whitehouse January 12th, 2008

A recent poll conducted by Voter/Consumer Research is being trotted out as proof that Sen. Mitch McConnell is invincible in 2008’s general election. I think some people are believing that “defeatocrat” nonsense way too much, that somehow a supposed 61% approval will doom any bids to defeat McConnell this fall. Well, as a few commenters at Bluegrass Report point out, this poll was commissioned by McConnell himself, and one has to wonder about the methodology.

While I’m sure that the general public is a bit gun-shy about pollsters, particularly after being so far off base in New Hampshire, the new SUSA poll shows McConnell’s approval at under 50%, which is more in-line with recent trends in his approval rating. We don’t doubt that beating a career incumbent politician with a lot of name recognition and a history of pork barrel spending will be a difficult task. But as the death toll in Iraq continues to rise with no end in sight, and as Kentuckians tighten their purse strings in preparation for a recession, Sen. McConnell has made it clear over and over again that he is completely out-of-touch with the majority of Kentuckians. We’re up to the fight. Is he?

Another McConnell ad full of blunders

Joe Sonka December 12th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Well, Mitch has done it again. His first ad was a monumental failure. It starred a creepy sexual harrasser, and gave the finger to the Club for Growth with his ode to big porky earmarks. Kentuckians were not impressed, as he plummeted to an all-time low approval in the next SUSA poll.

Mitch's new ad is another lemon, fortunately. McConnell actually thought he could win brownie points with Kentuckians by mentioning health care. Really, Mitch? Aren't you the same guy that continues to vote against the expansion of SCHIP, giving health care to millions more children from low-income families? The one with very broad bipartisan support that Bush continues to veto, with your approval? Aren't you the same guy whose office spread lies smearing Graeme Frost's family to national reporters, and then lied to the face of Mark Hebert when asked about it?

If Mitch McConnell wants to keep on mentioning what he's done to and for the health care industry, by all means, you have my blessing.

The DSCC already pounced on him:

One Month Before Touting Support for Medical Research, McConnell Voted Against It

Mitch McConnell began airing ads yesterday touting his success in securing funds for medical research centers at Kentucky universities. What the ad fails to mention, however, is that time and time again McConnell has voted against funding for medical research, including a vote against the Labor-HHS bill to provide $1.4 billion in increased research funding only one month ago. The ad also covers up McConnell’s disastrous overall record on healthcare, which includes leading the fight against children’s health care.

“Only Mitch McConnell would have the gall to run ads touting medical research just a month after voting against it,” DSCC spokesman Matthew Miller said. “Kentuckians are looking for progress on healthcare, not commercials on healthcare, and Mitch McConnell has consistently failed to deliver it.”

McConnell Led Effort to Reject New Medical Research Funding.  McConnell introduced a motion that rejected $1.4 billion in new medical research funding, supporting instead President Bush’s proposed 1.7% cut — the fourth consecutive year of flat or declining funding for medical cures.  [Vote 390, 10/23/07; Research!America, 2008 Federal Research Budget Update; Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 11/16/07]

Even Newt Gingrich Disagrees with McConnell’s Cuts to the National Institutes of Health.  “NIH funding has been flat since 2004, undermining the gains earned through the doubling of the budget and slowing the pace of progress in biomedical research. The Bush administration's proposed fiscal year 2008 budget would cut $329 million from last year's allocation of $28.6 billion. Biomedical inflation significantly compounds the impact of this reduction. This is exactly the wrong course for the country.” [Newt Gingrich and G. Steven Burrill, SF Chronicle, 6/27/07 ]

McConnell Has Voted Against Children’s Health Care Six Times. Mitch McConnell voted six times this year to block a bipartisan bill to expand health care to an additional 51,000 children in Kentucky.[Families USA Report; Vote 307, 8/2/07; Vote 352, 9/27/07;  Vote 353, 9/27/07; Vote 401, 10/31/07; Vote 402, 11/1/07; Vote 403, 11/1/07]

McConnell Received $1,664,483 From the Health Industry Since 1989.  Since 1989, McConnell has received at least $1,664,483 in campaign contributions from health industry interests.  McConnell received $490,878 from industry PAC’s and $1,173,605 from individual donors.   [Center for Responsive Politics, 10/9/07]

 

Quick Hit: Bush Set to Veto SCHIP. Again.

Terri Whitehouse December 12th, 2007

The AP reports that President George W. Bush is ready to veto yet another version of SCHIP. And it’s not sitting well with Republican legislators, as it well shouldn’t:

But the votes are uncomfortable for GOP lawmakers. It is a popular program with the public, making some Republicans wary of sticking with Bush on such an issue with the 2008 elections looming. Of the 43 million people nationwide who lack health insurance, more than 6 million are under 18 years old. That’s more than 9 percent of all children.

Keep sending it through, and let the same handful of shameful line-toers keep opposing it. Sure will make it easier in 2008, after which we can get some real work done!

The Grim Reaper

Joe Sonka November 19th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots and DailyKos)

I was just finished watching SiCKO at home last night, when I opened my email to find this story on Mitch’s speech to the Federalist Society. Here’s a line from the speech:

“The Senate is the place where legislation goes to die, and some would say you’re looking at the grim reaper,” he said to strong applause.

Yes, you read that correctly.

We live in a country where 18,000 people die every year simply because they do not have health insurance. Mitch McConnell and George W. Bush take great pride in the fact that they shot down the expansion of SCHIP to 10 million uninsured kids in America. Because that would be socialized medicine.

We have lost almost 4000 American soldiers in Iraq. A war that Bush and McConnell started by choice. A war that Mitch McConnell has blindly rubber stamped for over 4 years. Who knows how many more we’ll lose. But Mitch continues to block legislation to change course in Iraq. Because the terrorists will follow us home.

At least 430 veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan have committed suicide. In 2006 alone, over 900 tried to kill themselves. Mitch McConnell takes great pleasure in leading the 2 filibusters of Sen. Jim Webb’s amendments to restore proper troops rotations, giving the terribly strained troops an equal amount of time home with their families as they do in Iraq. But Mitch continues to block such legislation. Because that would be admitting defeat and surrendering to the Islamofascits.

Over 75,000 Iraq civilians have lost their life. 75,000. Because Sadam was making chemical and nuclear weapons, and we couldn’t let the smoking gun be in the shape of a mushroom cloud.

***********************

I made a vow after I read that quote last night. I will devote every last second, every last amount of energy I have, every last drop of my blood, my very last breath, to making sure that Mitch McConnell does not serve another term in the US Senate.

Who’s with me?

Mitch the Grinch

Joe Sonka November 10th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Here’s my column in the current issue of Lexington’s W Weekly. I think it’s a nice welcome to the post-Ernie era for our pal Mitch. They say there’s no such thing as bad publicity, right?

When one is presented with the opportunity to provide healthcare to an additional 10 million children from low-income families, most people believe that our government should take advantage of it. In fact, almost 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 80% in opinion polls agree.

Others say, tough luck kiddo. Pull yourself up by your own bootie straps like a real American.

Senator Mitch McConnell would be one of those people.

Though outnumbered in both Congress and public opinion for the past 2 months, Mitch McConnell and George W. Bush have been able to derail the overwhelmingly popular and bipartisan legislation to expand healthcare for such children under the already successful SCHIP program. Despite many Republicans breaking ranks to support and pass the expansion of SCHIP, there were not enough votes to overturn Bush’s veto of the bill. Last week, McConnell again sided with the fringe minority in the Senate by voting against a new version of the bill, which he regards as “wasteful spending” and a stepping stone to “socialized medicine”.

But the Lexington Herald-Leader has recently discovered other avenues for our tax dollars that Mitch McConnell does not regard as “wasteful spending”.

One such avenue would be providing $25 million to a foreign military arms contractor called BAE. This was not $25 million that the Defense Department requested, mind you, but rather money that McConnell snuck into a defense appropriations bill as an earmark (pork, as they say).

And who is BAE? Well, they are a foreign company that is currently under investigation from several different countries, including our own Justice Department, for bribing public officials with hundreds of millions of dollars in order to secure contracts.

It should also be noted that BAE’s PACs and employees have given McConnell at least $53,000 in contributions since 2002. BAE’s subsidiary has also donated $500,000 to the new “McConnell Center” at the University of Louisville.

But I’m sure those two facts have nothing to do with one another.

So what other recipients of our tax dollars are not considered “wasteful spending”? How about clients of powerful Washington, D.C. lobbyist Hunter Bates? He was a top level staffer for McConnell from 1997-2003, and now heads his own lobbying firm, Bates Capital.

Bates represents “Voice for Humanity”, an organization formed to “spread the word of Christ throughout the world”. From 2003-2005, McConnell earmarked $8.3 million dollars to Voice for Humanity, so that they could send small mp3 players to people in Afghanistan. Recordings on these devices were supposed to teach the Afghanis how to have a democracy.

No, seriously.

McConnell has also earmarked $2.5 million to e-Cavern, $2.1 million to Boardpoint LLC and $17 million to Appriss Inc., all of whom paid large fees to hire Bates Capital.

During that time, Bates’ clients have given McConnell a total of over $120,000 in campaign contributions.

Again, maybe it’s just a coincidence.

Or maybe this is just the standard operating procedure for Mitch McConnell. Maybe those who play the game get rewarded, and those who don’t are left behind. You scratch my back, I’ll put $5 million in earmarks in your back pocket.

This kind of behavior, awarding constituents and donors back in your home district, is supposed to be avoided like kryptonite according to the mantra of “fiscal conservativism” within the Republican Party. Republicans like John McCain have long railed against these earmarks slipped into legislation, blaming it for building up massive debt in our federal budget. House Republican leader John Boehner also decries earmarks, saying of his supporters, “if they wanted someone who would raid the federal treasury on their behalf, they should vote for someone else”. Mitch McConnell apparently has no such qualms.

McConnell was a very strong critic of the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Bill passed a few years ago that set strict limits on the amount of soft money that individuals could contribute to campaigns. He argued that this was a violation of Americans’ “freedom of speech”. Indeed, money is speech to McConnell. And if you aren’t giving him money, he doesn’t hear you.

McConnell’s war chest for his re-election campaign next year is almost at $10 million, already. And this war chest is full of money from the health insurance industry. So when you see Mitch McConnell fighting so hard with the rest of the fringe minority to block the expansion of SCHIP, just know who is in his ear, whispering sweet nothings. Rest assured, it is not the children of low-income families who cannot afford health insurance.

Perhaps the only way for these kids to get through to Mitch McConnell is to repeal the child labor laws that we’ve had the past century. Hire them as big shot lobbyists, and let them wheel and deal with Mitch on the only level that he understands and respects.

Until then, poor kids who fall through the cracks and don’t have health insurance only have one option when they’re sick. Suck it up, walk it off, and keep pulling up on those bootie straps.

AUC: Mitch McConnell, “How do you sleep at night?”

Matt Gunterman November 8th, 2007

Americans United for Change announces a new ad holding Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) accountable for his campaign to undermine children’s health care.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Date: November 8th, 2007

Americans United for Change Launches New TV Ad Campaign Slamming Mitch McConnell for Continuing to Stand in the Way of Healthcare for 10 Million Kids of Working Families

Ad asks the Obstructionist-in-Chief “How do You Sleep at Night?” After Voting to Deny Healthcare to 49,100 Kentucky Kids?

Washington D.C. –Americans United for Change, a leading coalition partner in the $2.5 million Campaign to Save Children’s Healthcare, unveiled a new television ad today taking Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) to task for continuing to stand in the way of healthcare for 10 million children in need. Sen. McConnell has repeatedly attempted to derail efforts to pass the bipartisan Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act – critical and hugely popular legislation to reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) for 6.6 million kids and expand coverage to nearly 4 million more low income children, including 49,100 more kids in Kentucky. In response, AUFC is airing a new television ad statewide in Kentucky entitled “What If?” that asks Sen. McConnell if he would still vote against children’s healthcare if his own child’s healthcare was at stake, pointedly concluding: “How do you sleep at night, Senator McConnell?” View the Ad Here.

Last week, during a critical impasse in the children’s healthcare debate, Minority Leader McConnell refused to delay a vote on passage of the latest version of the SCHIP bill; delaying the vote would have allowed more time for U.S. House and Senate negotiators to work out a deal to attract the 12 or so more votes needed in the House to achieve veto-proof margin and provide 10 million kids in need with healthcare. Without more time to negotiate, the Senate went on to pass the latest version of the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act on November 1st by a 64-30 veto-proof margin – a version that the President has already promised to veto and lacks the handful of votes needed in the House to override it. McConnell and fellow Bush ‘yes men’ in both chambers of Congress still voted against the latest version of the children’s healthcare bill even after revised and strengthened language was added to address any and all their concerns about illegal immigrants, adults and children from high-income families benefiting from the program.

“Obstructionist-in-Chief Mitch McConnell wants to keep playing games, constantly moving the goals posts, coming up with more excuses, one weaker than the last of why he opposes providing healthcare for 10 million kids in need,” said Americans United for Change spokesman Jeremy Funk. “McConnell stood with Bush and voted against the latest bipartisan children’s healthcare bill even after all his concerns about illegal immigrants, adults and children from high-income families benefiting from the program were effectively taken off the table. That sends a clear message that Sen. McConnell intends to back this President to the bitter end and has zero interest in compromising to provide healthcare for the Kentucky families who go to bed every night praying their children don’t get sick or hurt.”

“Sen. McConnell is all out of excuses, yet he continues to play petty partisan games with legislation that would mean healthcare for almost 50,000 more kids from working families in Kentucky,” said Americans United for Change spokesman Jeremy Funk. “Sen. McConnell owes these families an explanation how he can support spending half a trillion dollars fighting an endless war in Iraq, but oppose spending a fraction of that on healthcare for his most vulnerable constituents here at home. It’s a question of priorities, and Senator McConnell has his all mixed up. The fact is, for what we spend in just one week in Iraq, 800,000 children could get health insurance for an entire year.”

“It’s time for Sen. McConnell to stop parroting half-truths and distortions from the White House and start representing Kentucky families,” added Funk. “These are not illegal immigrants he’s voting to deny healthcare – these are not adults and children from high-income families. These are kids whose parents work hard but can’t afford private insurance and are not disadvantaged enough to qualify for Medicaid.”

“If Senator McConnell continues to obstruct healthcare for kids while supporting a blank check for President Bush’s failed war in Iraq, this campaign is prepared to not let a single family in Kentucky forget it. If Sen. McConnell again puts blind loyalty to this President ahead of healthcare for sick kids, we have to ask: “How do you sleep at night, Senator?”

###

Mitch McConnell: Money for criminal arms contractors, not poor kids’ healthcare

Joe Sonka November 4th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

As we see in the NYT editorial this morning, the fringe Republicans in the Senate, led by Mitch McConnell, are obstructing the bipartisan plan to expand health care to more low income children. All so their insurance industry donors can squeeze that very last penny out of the working class:

Cynicism and hypocrisy were on full display in the Senate last week when Republican leaders refused to wait for a possible compromise on a bill that would provide health coverage for millions of uninsured children. Instead, they forced a vote on a bill that they know President Bush will veto, with no chance of being overridden.

For weeks now, the president and his Congressional allies have charged that the Democrats are unwilling to negotiate a compromise on expanding the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or S-chip, because they want to use Republican opposition as a campaign issue. But it is the Senate’s Republican leaders who are doing their best to block any compromise.

They clearly would prefer to have no bill enacted — and provide ammunition for the president’s campaign to depict Congress as a failure — than do anything meaningful to help children.

The bill up for consideration in the Senate had already passed the House with substantial bipartisan support — but not quite enough votes to overcome another veto. As a result, a few prominent senators from both parties had been meeting with House Republicans to work out a compromise that could attract enough moderate Republicans to overcome a veto. Those talks, according to a key participant, were making “really good progress.”

That is when Senate Republican leaders stepped in and, under the rules, refused to postpone a scheduled vote to allow more negotiations. The result was predictable. The Senate, which has always been enthusiastic about expanding S-chip, approved the House-passed bill by a thumping 64-to-30 vote. But the bill lacks enough Republican support in the House for an override.

The efforts to find a compromise are expected to continue, and we can only hope they ultimately bear fruit. Surely there are enough Republicans in the House who are more concerned with children’s health than with ideological posturing and gamesmanship.

But who is worthy of receiving your tax dollars? How about foreign arms contractors who are under investigation all over the world, including our own Justice Dept., for BRIBERY? How about the same contractor under investigation for BRIBERY that has given Mitch McConnell $16,500 in the last 5 years and gave $500,000 to the “McConnell Center”? Oh yes, they beat out those kids in a landslide.

From James Carroll at the C-J (and a late welcome to the party C-J, I must add! Better late than never on this story…)

WASHINGTON — Over the past decade, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has secured more than $336 million for the building and refurbishing of naval guns in Louisville.

The next installment of $25 million is waiting in the fiscal 2008 defense spending bill.

But two government reform groups want to put a hold on the money because the company that does the work, BAE Systems, is under federal investigation over bribery allegations.

Taxpayers for Common Sense, a budget watchdog group, and the National Legal and Policy Center, which promotes ethics in government, have sent a letter to Senate and House chairmen of the appropriations committees, as well as to the ranking Republicans on those panels. It says the federal funding for BAE and for ProLogic Inc., another company under investigation, is “troubling.”

“If they are being investigated, lawmakers shouldn’t be directing taxpayer dollars to these companies until they’re cleared — or not,” said Steve Ellis, vice president of Taxpayers for Common Sense.

**************

Two years ago United Defense — which was not implicated in any alleged wrongdoing — was bought by the British-based BAE and absorbed into that firm.

United Defense contributed $500,000 to the University of Louisville’s McConnell Center for Leadership, created by the senator.

In addition, political action committees associated with United Defense and BAE have given a total of $16,500 to McConnell campaigns since 2002, records show.

According to published reports, BAE has been under investigation by the Department of Justice, as well as European authorities, for its dealings with Saudi Arabia and members of that nation’s royal family as far back as 1985.

BAE has denied that it bribed Saudi royalty as part of an $86 billion arms deal.

“BAE Systems … is proud of our very strong records of ethics, compliance and performance in service to America’s armed forces,” company spokesman Greg Caires said in a statement. “We continue to cooperate with the ongoing Department of Justice investigation, and it would be inappropriate for us to comment further at this time.”

ProLogic is being investigated for allegedly using public money to develop commercial computer software, according to the Wall Street Journal. The company has denied any wrongdoing.

Taxpayers for Common Sense is a longtime critic of so-called earmarks, which are specific amounts of money inserted by lawmakers into congressional spending bills for hometown and home-state projects. The group contends the earmarks amount to special, no-bid contracts that receive little or no scrutiny and often are not requested by federal agencies. (A broader discussion of the issue is on Page A3.)

This is the first time that Taxpayers for Common Sense and the National Legal and Policy Center have requested suspension of earmarks because companies that could benefit were under investigation.

The idea, Ellis said, follows on what House Republicans did after some of their members came under investigation for alleged wrongdoing: The lawmakers were required to relinquish committee posts.

“The way we looked at it, this is now extending to contractors and companies” under the shadow of investigation, he said.

Mitch’s War Against Poor Kids continues

Joe Sonka November 3rd, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Once more, Mitch McConnell chooses to side with the extreme fringe minority, voting against the bipartisan legislation to expand SCHIP. Matthew Miller at the DSCC sums it up:

For the sixth time in recent months, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell led a small segment of his Republican colleagues in voting against the bipartisan Children’s Health Insurance Program today – despite changes made to the bill to address Republicans’ stated concerns and a recent poll showing that over 80% of Americans favor expanding the program. McConnell’s vote to deny 51,500 Kentucky children health care comes just weeks after he was caught on tape misleading Kentuckians about his office’s role in a smear campaign against 12-year old Graeme Frost.

“It seems like every day Mitch McConnell makes another bad choice on children’s health care,” DSCC spokesman Matthew Miller said. “Between getting caught in a smear campaign against a 12-year old boy and voting against children’s health care yet again, Mitch McConnell probably wishes the SCHIP debate would just go away. But the thousands of uninsured Kentucky children can’t be swept under the rug, and neither will McConnell’s decision to turn his back on them.”

McConnell Votes Against Children’s Health Care… Again. For the sixth time in recent months, Mitch McConnell voted today to block a bipartisan bill to expand health care to an additional 51,000 children in Kentucky.[ Families USA Report; Vote 307, 8/2/07; Vote 352, 9/27/07; Vote 353, 9/27/07; Vote 401, 10/31/07; Vote 402, 11/1/07; Vote 403, 11/1/07]

What’s the Excuse for Voting Against Children’s Health This Time?
The revised children’s health bill explicitly addressed the Republican excuses for opposing the first version of the bill, for example reiterating that illegal immigrants are ineligible, more rapidly excluding childless adults, and capping eligibility. [Statement of Administration Policy, H.R. 3963; HR 3963, 2007]

81% Support Expanding Children’s Health Care
. According to an October 17 CBS News survey, a whopping 81% of American favor expanding the State Children’s Health Insurance Program. In addition, only 22% of those polled say they approve of Bush’s handling of health care after he vetoed the children’s health bill. [CBS News, 10/17/07]

McConnell Aide Admitted to Sending Email Pushing SCHIP Smear. In October 2007, a McConnell aide admitted that he had sent an email to reporters highlighting inaccurate charges made on conservative blogs accusing the family of a child who helped promote the SCHIP program of being undeserving of federal assistance. In the email, the McConnell aide wrote, “bloggers have done a little digging and turned up that the Dad owns his own business (and the building it’s in), seems to have some commercial rental income and Graeme and a sister go to a private school that, according to its Web site, costs about $20k a year — for each kid — despite the news profiles reporting a family income of only $45k for the Frosts.”Could the Dems really have done that bad of a job vetting this family?” [ Louisville Courier-Journal, 10/16/07]

McConnell Was Aware That His Staff Promoted Swift-Boating of Child. In October 2007, it was reported that McConnell had been aware of the email sent by his staff alerting reporters to blog attacks on the family of a child that had spoken out on SCHIP legislation, even while he denied that his office had been involved. McConnell’s staffer admitted that he had told McConnell about the emails on Thursday, the day before he denied the accusations during a TV interview. [ Louisville Courier-Journal, 10/17/07]

How does Mitch McConnell sleep at night?

Joe Sonka November 1st, 2007

Like the WATB that he is, probably.

Another great ad ripping his SCHIP vote.

Sen. Mitch McConnell on the run!

Matt Gunterman October 29th, 2007

Literally! Yes! Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) fled Kentucky today in the face of a protest at a joint appearance that he was to make with soon-to-be-outgoing Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R). Here’s the action as it was unfolding from Aniello:

# # #

After the Senator shamelessly led the refusal to insure over 50,000 Kentucky children, he and Governor Fletcher are making a PR tour of the Kosair’s Children’s hospital. Health care workers & advocates are leading a protest outside of Kosair’s right now. We are going to show Senator McConnell, and the semi-responsible local media, that his political tricks are not going unnoticed. His actions are insulting to the intelligence of Kentuckians and the children to which he has repeatedly denied basic health care insurance.

# # #

That message was soon followed by:

# # #

When health care workers and Iraq War protesters showed up outside Kosair’s Childrens Hospital, Senator McConnell suddenly canceled his tour even though he is still in Louisville.

Please spread the word!!!

# # #

Yes, indeed! Spread it far and wide! Mitch McConnell is a coward! As Shawn put it below, Mitch McConnell is shameless! And, most important of all: Mitch McConnell is vulnerable!

I want to personally thank progressive activists like Aniello and Judy — who’s a frequent commenter here and also a part of the backbone of the Louisville-area progressive community — and the many others who give of their time, and their energy, and their passion to make all the wonderful change and action we see happening in Kentucky possible. What you do is an inspiration to so many of us, in Kentucky and elsewhere.

What Color Are the Holes In Your Parachute?

Terri Whitehouse October 23rd, 2007

I would like to point you to this post by La Lubu at Feministe. It is quite long, but an absolute must-read, especially for those who oppose SCHIP. No tugging at the heartstrings. No snark. Just a no-nonsense account by a woman continuing to do her damnedest to give her “micropreemie” daughter the best chances for survival and a happy, productive life.

That is what is behind the opposition to S-CHIP. That those currently without a safety net, save that of their own wages and savings, should necessarily suffer. Should declare bankruptcy. It is their destiny. After all, if they were Worthy People, they would be able to come up with the money on their own. They would be able to find a sponsor. Hence, the number of benefit parties, barbecues, chili cook-offs, mostaccioli dinners, and poker runs held at taverns, union halls, churches (temples, masjids), and social clubs throughout the midwest and elsewhere; a desparate attempt to come up with some kind of money, and prove some kind of personal worth in the face of cancer, accidents, heart attacks, strokes, premature birth, job loss and any number of cascading personal crises that don’t tend to arrive alone.

More Bad News for Mitch: Poll number even worse than they appear

Joe Sonka October 23rd, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Yesterday we found that Mitch McConnell’s poll numbers have tanked, with his disapproval jumping to 45%, an all-time high. Additionally, his numbers among women dropped from 49/39 to 44/46, and among moderates plunged even further, from 42/50 to 37/57.

But that’s only the beginning of the bad news for Mitch.

This SUSA poll was conducted from 10/12 to 10/14. This is before Jim Carroll’s C-J article in which McConnell’s office first responded to and verified the charges that they sent out the false smear of the Frosts to reporters. This was before Mark Herbert came out with the video of Mitch McConnell LYING to the face of all Kentuckians, claiming that his office had non involvement whatsoever in doing so. This is before the C-J and LHL wrote damning editorials on Mitch’s behavior in this entire fiasco. This is before Hawpe, Keeling and Leonard called Mitch out on his shameful behavior.

If this poll shows that soccer moms hated McConnell a week and a half ago, just think of what their opinion of him is now.

Bush, McConnell Ask for $190 Billion for Wars

Shawn Dixon October 22nd, 2007

Mitch McConnell will surely be the Bush administration’s biggest cheerleader their request today for an additional $42 billion dollars for the war in Iraq. That puts the total request this year at $190 billion dollars.

NYTimes

In February, the administration asked for $141.7 billion for the wars, warning at the time that the amount could increase later. Assuming today’s request is approved by Congress, the wars are now expected to cost taxpayers more than $190 billion for the fiscal year that began on Oct. 1.

Just want to be sure everyone has perspective on this, the SCHIP bill that McConnell has fought so hard to defeat that would have expanded healthcare to an additional 10 million uninsured American children would have costs $35 billion.

So, while McConnell is not comfortable spending $35 billion to ensure the nation’s poorest kids have access to a doctor, he is more than willing to keep piling on to his $650 billion tab for his failed war in Iraq.

Says a lot about his character.

Two Children and One Senator

Terri Whitehouse October 22nd, 2007

NPR’s “On the Media” covered the time-line and link between Sen. Mitch McConnell’s office and the right-wing smears of two SCHIP families. Please listen to the audio archive here. Interviewed for the story, the Courier-Journal’s James Carroll was reluctant to call Sen. McConnell’s statement to WHAS’s Mark Hebert a lie. Carroll also gets it wrong when he points to old poll numbers. It’s been a long time since Sen. McConnell’s approval was at 54%.

Blogger MatthewYglesias says what we’re all thinking: it’s preposterous and infuriating when the right-wingers claim that children and families aren’t poor enough to get health care assistance. Further, they miss the point completely, and are totally oblivious to the fact that, yes, even full-time working, two-parent, lower-middle-income households are having a hard time making ends meet. Yup. People who do everything that the GOP says they should do (be hetero, work hard, get married, not abort) are no longer immune to their smear tactics. Go, Sen. McConnell, go on and continue to alienate 80% of your voters. Every little nail in the 2008 coffin helps.

Hawpe: After getting caught red-handed smearing 12 y.o., McConnell “hasn’t even blushed”

Matt Gunterman October 21st, 2007

David Hawpe adds his two cents to the Graeme Frost smear campaign scandal out of Sen. Mitch McConnell’s office.

My biggest question at the moment: will McConnell’s persistent silence on this issue work? It’s obvious that he’s expecting that, by keeping his mouth shut, he won’t add any political fuel to the fire and that coverage of the episode will die down before it’s imprinted on the collective memory of Kentuckians.

John Kerry is roundly criticized today for not responding earlier to baseless attacks on his military service. Is McConnell making a similar mistake? Is he just not understanding how identifiable this story is with the average Kentuckian? It’s just not that Kentuckians can identify with a 12 y.o. kid who’s being beaten up by a 60 y.o. millionaire asshole and his staff. I don’t think McConnell has any clue how the average Kentuckian understands the fear of losing one’s health insurance and not being able to care for your loved ones. He’s never, ever known that fear, since he’s been on the government dole and enrolled in socialized medicine his entire adult life. In McConnell’s head and in the heads of those who are unthinking like him, he sees not being able to afford health insurance as part of the breaks. He and those like him believe that Americans without insurance should just accept their fate.

So, watch the latest Survey USA tracking poll numbers. I believe I’m correct in saying that the polling is being done this weekend and thus should reflect any movement on the Graeme Frost episode.

Autumn leaves, better heifers and the politics of hate

[...]

Take Sen. Mitch McConnell. His office was caught trying to promote the smear of a Baltimore family, when brain-injured 12-year-old Graeme Frost spoke up for the State Children’s Health Care Insurance Program, which helped when he and his little sister were badly injured in an accident.

As Matthew Hay Brown described it in the Baltimore Sun, “Bonnie Frost was driving children Zeke, Graeme and Gemma in Baltimore County in December 2004 when the family vehicle hit a patch of black ice and slammed into a tree. Graeme sustained a brain stem injury; Gemma suffered a cranial fracture. … The family relied on SCHIP during the more than five months that the children were hospitalized. Graeme had to learn again to walk and talk, his parents say; he remains weak on his left side and speaks with a lisp. Gemma is blind in her left eye; she has difficulty with memory, learning and speech, and sees a behavioral psychologist to help her deal with her frustration.”

McConnell aide Don Stewart alerted reporters by e-mail that “bloggers have done a little digging” and turned up evidence the family might not be a legitimate SCHIP user. Hours later he sent another e-mail saying a blogger he trusted had concluded “the family is legit.”

Stewart told McConnell all of this, yet the senator, when asked about the e-mails, said that “there was no involvement whatsoever” by his office.

When this example of disinformation was exposed, did McConnell turn red with embarrassment? Did he apologize? Did he promise to caution Stewart about premature and potentially hurtful attempts at manipulating the news? Did he express regret over the role Republicans may have played in the smears and death threats directed at Graeme and his family by right-wing bloggers?

As far as I know, he hasn’t even blushed.

No premature coloration that might suggest he was weak or susceptible to attack.

[...]

###

McConnell’s smear campaign against injured 12 y.o. still working its way through national media

Matt Gunterman October 20th, 2007

The smear campaign against 12 y.o. Graeme Frost and his parents that was orchestrated by the staff of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) is still gaining momentum in the national press. Just today, the Kansas City Star put up this editorial:

BLOG BITS: Dirty trick; attack on Bhutto; take a stand on FISA

Dirty trick

This latest action by Republicans in Washington has to rank among the lowest. In an effort to beat back full funding for children’s health care, the staff of Sen. Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican, supported a smear campaign against a 12-year-old survivor of a car crash. A hard-working, two-job family with four children, the Frosts of Baltimore were struck by tragedy: a car accident nearly killed two of their children. Because of SCHIP, the Frosts could afford the five months of hospitalization that allowed their children to survive.

[...]

Kentucky’s local press is still getting in on the action. Here’s Bob Leonard writing for the Georgetown (KY) News-Graphic:

McConnell should be ashamed

Let me get straight to the point - Kentucky’s senior United States senator, Mitch McConnell, should be ashamed of himself. Or, at the very least, he should be ashamed of his communications director, Don Stewart, and terminate him immediately.

[...]

But McConnell crossed the line of civility when his office orchestrated a partisan attack on a 12-year-old boy, Graeme Frost, by the right-wing zealots who line up to impugn any person or organization who dare disagree with the Republican Party. By zealots, I specifically mean Rush Limbaugh, Michelle Malkin and others of their ilk who will tell any lie or misrepresent any fact in an effort to discredit and slime their political opponents.

In this case, the only transgression of Graeme Frost was to speak on national radio, in spite of a partially paralyzed vocal cord, about how he and his sister would not have survived and recovered from a horrible car accident without the insurance coverage provided by SCHIP. The accident left them in a coma for months, and required years of therapy to teach them how to talk, eat, swallow and walk again.

This personal story that put a face with the program so offended the right-wingers that they immediately set out to destroy the child and his family’s credibility by disseminating lies about their health, their employment and their financial condition.

And who was leading this charge to malign a 12-year-old for telling his story? None other than our good senator, Mitch McConnell, and his communications director, Don Stewart. On the day after Graeme bravely told his story on radio, Stewart was busy sending out e-mails containing blatant falsehoods about the Frost family in an attempt to totally discredit and destroy their credibility. As a result, the family has even received death threats.

When it was first suspected that McConnell’s office was involved, he refused to comment. Subsequently, he professed a lack of knowledge of his staff’s actions. Yeah, right. His staff did this without his knowledge or acquiescence. McConnell, who claimed righteous indignation at MoveOn.org’s ad about Gen. Petraeus, wants us to believe he would not be a party in propagating such fallacies.

If he wants me to believe his story, he should bolster his own credibility by also being righteously indignant at his communications director. After all, that’s what he demanded from members of Congress concerning the MoveOn.org advertisement. Absent this indignation, we must assume McConnell believes a 12-year-old is more capable of defending his honor than a four-star general.

###

And, in case you missed this editorial in the Courier-Journal today, you should read it. It’s getting lots of play in the progressive blogosphere.

Hold firm for kids

The House vote that failed to override President Bush’s veto of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) was a real test of values.

In siding with the President and against millions of kids, the House Republicans — including Kentuckians Ron Lewis, Geoff Davis, Ed Whitfield and Hal Rogers — hid behind patently false claims that the bill to expand SCHIP was a move toward socialized medicine. The measure was an effort to meet real human need, not a sneaky way to establish another federal entitlement for the middle class.

What was rejected this week, by the same GOP members who sabotaged it last month, was a bill to provide insurance for 10 million children. Indiana Rep. Baron Hill, D-9th District, did change his mind and voted this time for the welfare of these youngsters. Supporters earlier had beaten the Senate GOP minority and its leader, Kentucky’s Mitch McConnell, with a veto-proof margin for the legislation.

[...]

Sen. McConnell is spinning the House failure to override the President’s veto. His chilling position is, “Now that the veto has been sustained, it’s time to move forward with a serious plan to extend health coverage for those SCHIP was meant to cover: low-income children. It’s time to stop the campaign ads and time to start working across party lines to forge a bipartisan compromise.”

In fact, the defeated bill was fully as serious as the huge need it was written to meet. And the notion that it was a mere political ploy is easily rebutted by the fact that Sens. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, were among its chief defenders. It was Sen. Grassley who rejected White House distortions about the bill, saying, “The White House claims are flatly incorrect.”

If the House Democrats are who they claim to be, they won’t let George W. Bush push them, and needy children, around on this issue.

###

Cheves: McConnell won’t give America’s poor kids the health care he’s received his entire adult life

Matt Gunterman October 19th, 2007

This strong piece from the Herald-Leader’s John Cheves says it all about the rank vileness of Sen. Mitch McConnell (R) denying America’s children access to the same quality health care that McConnell has gotten his entire adult life from the government.

I think the most telling bit of information here that reveals McConnell’s current state of mind is this: McConnell’s office did not return repeated calls seeking comment for this story.

Silence has been McConnell’s response to the entire SCHIP fiasco. He and his staff have been putrid in their behavior; they can’t argue that fact. And the more and more they open their mouths, the more putrid they seem.

McConnell SCHIP stance criticized
OPPOSES EXPANDING TAXPAYER-SUBSIDIZED CARE, WHICH HE HAS

By John Cheves

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., has warned about the slippery slope leading to “government-run health care for everyone” while rallying his colleagues against expansion of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP.

But as a U.S. senator, McConnell gets government-run, taxpayer-subsidized insurance through the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program, including free outpatient treatment by doctors at the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., and Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. When McConnell needed triple bypass heart surgery in 2003, he checked into the Naval Medical Center and was treated by the hospital’s clinical chief of cardiothoracic surgery.

“Sen. McConnell’s objection to this legislation gives disingenuousness a bad name,” said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a non-profit, non-partisan advocacy group that is lobbying for SCHIP expansion.

If government-run health care is good enough for McConnell, “it should be provided to this nation’s disadvantaged children,” Pollack said.

Unlike other lawmakers who established themselves in the private sector before joining Congress — such as Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., a Hall of Fame baseball pitcher — McConnell has drawn government pay and benefits throughout his adult life: as a young Senate aide fresh out of law school, a U.S. Justice Department lawyer, Jefferson County judge-executive and for 23 years in the Senate.

[...]

McConnell’s office did not return repeated calls seeking comment for this story. In a written statement, his spokesman Don Stewart denied that McConnell’s warnings about “government-run health care” are hypocritical because the senator and his aides receive government-run, taxpayer-subsidized health insurance.

“We work for the government, and as our employer, the government pays the employer portion of our premium just as would be the case if we worked for any other company,” Stewart wrote.

[...]

Although members of Congress enjoy some exclusive health care perks, the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program is open to all federal workers. Run by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, it uses the government’s muscle as a huge employer to obtain lower group coverage rates from a choice of private insurers — much as many states’ SCHIP programs operate, Pollack said.

The government pays 72 percent of the average premium under the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program.

Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., has proposed opening the program to uninsured Americans as part of her presidential campaign’s health care platform, so average citizens can get “the same choice of health plan options that members of Congress receive.”

Some Republicans refer to her plan as “socialized medicine.” Critics include GOP presidential candidates Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani.

###

REP. PETE STARK SPEAKING FOR SCHIP TELLS IT LIKE HE SEES IT. Youtube VIDEO.

Jim Pence October 18th, 2007

Mitchy-Poo, Where are You?

Terri Whitehouse October 18th, 2007

Editorials in two major Kentucky newspapers ask that question.

Exhibit A: The Courier-Journal, “McConnell Versus Truth”
Exhibit B: The Herald-Leader, “McConnell Error”

Indeed, Sen. Mitch McConnell has been curiously quiet in the last week or so. What he needs to do is simple, really. Condemn the attacks on the Frost family made by his supporters. Apologize for lying (or, at the very least, come up with some other transparent lie to explain why the first one wasn’t really a lie), and get back to work.

C-J follows up on McConnell’s LIE to WHAS

Joe Sonka October 17th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

How’s this for a headline and subtitle:

McConnell knew of emails about boy

TV interview included denial

James Carroll follows up on the story that is now spreading like wildfire throughout the internet. Mitch McConnell knowingly LIED to Mark Herbert last Friday when asked if anyone on his staff was sending the Frost lies to reporters.

WASHINGTON — Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell knew last week — at a time when he was denying it — that his staff had sent e-mails encouraging reporters to look into the background of a 12-year-old boy used by Democrats to support expansion of a health-care program.

In an interview Friday with WHAS-TV reporter Mark Hebert, the Kentucky Republican said his staff had not been involved in trying to push reporters to look into the financial situation of the boy’s family.

But McConnell’s communications director, Don Stewart, said in an interview Monday with The Courier-Journal that he had told McConnell about the Oct. 8 e-mails sometime around Thursday, the day before the interview with Hebert.

Stewart also said, however, that he had told the senator he had sent follow-up e-mails within a matter of hours warning reporters off of the story because “the family is legit.”

McConnell declined to comment on the matter last night.

Declined comment? Why don’t you just go ahead and lie again like you did Friday to Mark Herbert? Don’t tell me you’ve grown a sense of decency over the weekend, Mitch?

This story is NOT going away, no matter how much McConnell and Stewart try to spin, lie and deceive. The only possible way out of this clusterfuck is for Stewart to resign and McConnell to publicly apologize for lying to Herbert and his constituents. Don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.

BREAKING: Mitch’s LIE caught on WHAS video

Joe Sonka October 16th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Page One has the video up from WHAS’s 5:00 news, and what do we see?

We see Senator Mitch McConnell blatantly, 100% LYING to his KY constituents and the American people.

Take a good look at your Senator, Kentuckians. This is a man that will look right into your eyes and LIE to you.

(and Mitch…. you don’t punk Mark Herbert!)

WHAS Responds to McConnell’s Lie

Joe Sonka October 16th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

WHAS has responded to Mitch McConnell’s blatant lie on Friday, as he told Mark Herbert that no one in his office spread the false smear on 12-yr old Graeme Frost’s family. Expect much more from this on Mark Herbert’s 5:00 report.

Did McConnell mislead public?

01:48 PM EDT on Tuesday, October 16, 2007

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — It appears Senator Mitch McConnell may have misled WHAS11 News when he told us nobody on his staff had anything to do with an effort to dig into the background of a 12-year-old boy.
An aide to McConnell has admitted he sent an e-mail to Washington reporters, urging them to look into Graeme Frost, the boy who urged Congress to override the president’s veto of an expanded child health care bill. He’s been a target of conservative bloggers ever since.

McConnell’s aide, Don Stewart, says he told the senator about his role in the controversy on Thursday.

WHAS11’s Mark Hebert asked the senator about it on Friday.

“There was no involvement,” McConnell said. “None.”

Stewart says there was no effort to slime the 12-year-old, as Democrats allege.

McConnell’s aide says he sent a follow up e-mail to reporters, telling them “there was no story.”

Next »