Archive for the 'Religious Fanaticism' Category

What happened Thursday night in Iowa has Mitch McConnell (R) knees quaking

Matt Gunterman January 4th, 2008

Lots happened in Iowa Thursday night, but what trends in particular spell trouble for Sen. Mitch McConnell (R)?

Well, first, the anti-establishment/change theme was strong on both sides of the political divide. Fundamentalist Christians turned out in droves to thumb their collective nose at the political preferences of GOP establishment figures like McConnell — who has himself talked a good talk on social conservatism over the years, but has never walked the walk in his personal and family life or in his corporation-centered political philosophy and record. Fundamentalists are endorsing the candidacy of Mike Huckabee (R), and the GOP establishment’s sorry treatment of Huckabee is only going to embitter the man and his movement. It looks like after his primary fight the Fundies will be mad as hell and won’t be in a mood to take it any more.

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D) did you hear the people of Iowa last night? A candidate like Lt. Col. Andrew Horne (D) fits the bill of exactly what Americans are searching for in an opponent that can take out McConnell in 2008.

And, as we’ve said here many times in the past, you can see how disastrously McConnell’s reelection themes are going to play in the political environment in 2008. McConnell is constantly reminding Kentucky voters that he is the center of the Washington political establishment. With the economy heading into the Second George W. Bush Recession at this very moment, Kentuckians are going to be mad as hell themselves by November. McConnell is simply adding fuel to the fire as to why Kentuckians should despise the man and his machine and methods.

And, let’s be honest, Mitch McConnell’s GOP machine has empowered Fundies in Kentucky to an extreme. If the Fundies turn on the GOP nationally — by staying home in 2008 to punish the party leadership or supporting a third party candidate for President — then McConnell stands to lose a lot of support in his own race. These Kentucky Fundies are also at the core of Ernie Fletcher’s base; Fletcher was one of them in a way that McConnell never even pretended to be. Everyone knows that McConnell — in the most forgiving interpretation — is an amoral human being. So, the Fundies in Kentucky will have reasons in both the state and national contexts to turn on McConnell.

McConnell created has created a Fundamentalist monster for himself in Kentucky, and that monster is going to be giving him nightmares all throughout 2008.

These, my friends, are truly frightening paragraphs

Matt Gunterman November 25th, 2007

Yes. Frightening paragraphs. I was reading this oped by a lawyer in Lexington named W. Bryan Hubbard in this Sunday’s Herald-Leader with bemusement until I came to these words. Then the whole thing just turned dark and scary:

GOP must reclaim conservative high ground

[...]

In mockery’s face, we must continue to preach that America is special because it is divine. The God who created it is the same God who grants our liberty against the tyrant within. To protect a nation of faith, we must be a party of faith that welcomes all who worship and respect that which is greater than man.

We must preserve a nation of color. One hundred years from now, we will look and sound much different than we do today. Fear not, for America is not a language or color. It is the sum of history’s eternal dream — a land where freedom reigns and peace prevails.

We are called to keep that flame for those who risk life and limb to live in its light. If the choice must ever be made, may we be brown, speak Spanish and be free before we stay white, speak English and be socialist.

Freedom calls. The time has come to rise and march.

###

First, as far as the conservative high ground is concerned, they can have all the conservative ground they want. The rest of us — the vast majority of us — are going a different direction. It’s called progressive, and we’re looking for progress, not preserving the status quo.

Second, it really is the sign of a highly delusional mind to make a statement to tens of thousands of readers that the United States is divine. Let’s be frank; that’s a statement that all but the very fringe of religious Americans would eschew. That’s crazy talk.

Third, I love the not-so-latent racism. To paraphrase, ‘It’s better to be brown than socialist, but in the perfect world we’d remain white and capitalist.’ And do you know what will make us socialist in his eyes? Universal health care! Yes, that’s right, for conservatives, to provide every man woman and child in the country access to health care is socialism! Just like it’s socialist to provide every man woman and child access to state-sponsored education. Oops.

People. This man represents the state of the conservative movement in Kentucky.

Progressives rejoice!

Soon-to-be Gov. Steve Beshear can transform how the world sees Kentucky and how Kentuckians see themselves

Matt Gunterman November 5th, 2007

Yesterday morning a German friend emailed me to say that The New York Times Sunday travel section was running a feature on the finer qualities of bourbon and bluegrass in Kentucky.

He’s read much about Kentucky lately, and it’s intriguing him. Just last week, both the London-based Guardian newspaper and The American Prospect magazine ran pieces on the growth of progressive culture and politics in Kentucky. These follow in the wake of Bob Moser’s monumental cover story on Kentucky for The Nation in September.

When Terence Samuel, who authored the Guardian and TAP articles, interviewed me, he made the comment, “Everyone’s talking about Kentucky.”

People around the world are talking about Kentucky because — right here, right now — Kentuckians are offering them hope. In us they see the potential that the American spirit that has inspired so many generations of the past is finally awakening and is ready to take on the wicked specter that is the creation of hate- and fear-mongers like Pres. George W. Bush (R), Sen. Mitch McConnell (R), Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R), and Rep. Stan Lee (R).

They see it in the workers who are out canvassing neighborhoods today. They see it in the peace demonstrators who are agitating to end a senseless war. They see it in the families who are fighting for their children’s health care. They see it in the crusade to protect and restore our environment. They see it in people of faith who are standing up to the bigots and bullies who have dominated Kentucky pulpits for too long.

The evidence is all around that something is happening in Kentucky, and the world is hungry for that something to be a people who are innovative, bold, tolerant, and progressive.

There is not a thing about McConnell, Fletcher, or Lee that’s any of those things. They are instead calculating, rigid, bullying, and conservative.

Soon-to-be Governor-elect Steve Beshear (D) will have the opportunity to communicate to the world what the new Kentucky is all about.

Ernie Fletcher saw “selling” Kentucky as a mere re-branding exercise. Nothing of the substance changed, and the discerning public could see through that. Fletcher’s take on “unbridled spirit” was anything but.

But Beshear can change the substance because he is not beholden to the baser elements of Kentucky society; his opponent will win the vote of every sort of bigot our state has to offer. With Kentucky’s urban center of Louisville poised to enter a sort of renaissance (barring the next Bush recession undermining its growth), Kentucky can become part of a new face for the United States to the rest of the world, one that is dynamic and provocative, welcoming and welcomed.

Kentucky can’t move forward on jobs, education, or other quality of life issues if it doesn’t tackle those elements of its culture that are holding the state back, and Beshear is well positioned to change the conversation and move down a different path.

Rep. Stan Lee (R) is Kentucky’s version of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?)

Matt Gunterman October 31st, 2007

God bless Joe Sonka. God bless Joe Sonka because he works his tail off traversing Kentucky covering the various manifestations of right-wing lunacy in the commonwealth [If you haven't checked out Joe's blogosphere-famous coverage of the Creation Museum from earlier this year, do so].

I envy Joe because he has that ability to observe the multitude of nitwits that make up the Kentucky GOP with a humorous eye and a sly smirk. I, on the other hand, don’t suffer these fools so well, even from a thousand miles away. Yet Joe has the gift, through his writing, of putting the crazy nature of social conservatives in Kentucky in perspective.

For example, Joe has a frightening new report over at BlueGrassRoots (the article itself will be published in the Lexington-based W Weekly) about a recent meeting of the American Family Association of Kentucky.

I’m going to include some excerpts from Joe’s piece below, but the most important thing to remember is that both the Republican candidate for state attorney general, Rep. Stan Lee, and for state auditor, Linda Greenwell, were in attendance and fully engaged at this meeting.

You know how most of the world has been up-in-arms against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?) over his years-long effort to promote the cause of holocaust denial? It’s craziness. Rational people know it. That didn’t stop the Iranians from organizing and hosting a Holocaust denial conference last year. Birds of a feather flock together, as even the U.S.’s very own former Klu Klux Klan member David Duke took part.

In the end, we will never eliminate crazy beliefs like Holocaust denial, racism, xenophobia, or homophobia, but we can marginalize them. Peer pressure does work, especially here in the United States. Americans, by and large, want to be perceived as successful, accepted, and mainstream. So, by framing these sorts of beliefs as radical, extreme, undesirable and out-of-the-mainstream, you necessitate that people who continue to cling to them make an overt choice for themselves: which is more important to them, their hatred of others or their own prosperity?

It’s objectively true that hatred is not rational; it is morally wrong. Yet some people will not make the rational choice on their own; they need a little cajoling along the way. That’s where societal pressure comes into play.

Keep that in mind as you read what Joe has to say below about this meeting. Think about how outrageous its content was, and how scary it is that two of the Republican candidates for statewide office embraced this message and those who propagate it.

In short, these people at the American Family Association of Kentucky are free to have their beliefs; it’s a free country. The rest of us, however, should expect that men and women who strive to attain the highest levels of elected office in our land would not associate with them, would shun them. Instead, they are embracing them, and on election day the people of Kentucky will shun Stan Lee and Linda Greenwell as punishment.

Raging Bigotry and the Dying of the Right

Did you know that Lexington is run by the “Homosexual Hegemony”? That “the gays” own the government and the media? And the only way to get access to this power is to have the dirty gay sex with them?

Yea, neither did I.

[...]

Roughly 50 people squeezed into the cafeteria. After the first speaker told us how he escaped the evils of today’s society when God told him to start his own line of athletic apparel, it was Kent Ostrander’s turn. Ostrander, the founder of the like-minded Family Foundation, was a key player in the push to amend KY’s Constitution so that gay marriage and civil unions are now outlawed.

He was sure to preface his points with “now, I’m not trying to vilify homosexuals”. For example, he would say this just before his inaccurate tangent on how gay sex is the cause of 75% of AIDS in the world. “These people bring this on themselves!”

He further chastised UK, saying that allowing partners to receive health insurance is to tolerate and “validify” these relationships. Again, he “wasn’t trying to vilify gays”, but the “predatory ideas of the radical homosexual agenda” will destroy our families and society. Ostrander ended his speech, nearly shouting, “Our God shall reign!”

Next, a sociology student presented her research project on why the black community in Lexington is faced with the problems of poverty, crime and drug abuse. Her conclusion, after repeatedly informing us that she was a “scientist”? Young blacks in Lexington are mired in this because of….. The Gays. You see, homosexuals own all of the power in the black community of Lexington, coining it the “Homosexual Hegemony”. Those gays force young blacks wanting access to that power to tolerate and become acclimated to the gay lifestyle. One acclimated to this immorality, they succumb to the evils of drug abuse, crime and dirty gay sex.

But these are just the crazy ramblings of some small fringe cult, right? Apparently, not. Linda Greenwell, Republican candidate for Auditor in next week’s election, was happily handing out campaign literature to the crowd. Ostrander pointed out state Sen. Stan Lee in the crowd, thanking him for all of his work to “support our cause in Frankfort”. Lee, the Republican candidate for Attorney General, took a bow and soaked in the applause.

Then, it was Frank Simon’s turn. He jumped right into the “culture war” routine, blasting the godless villains who have taken the commandments, literal creation science and prayer out of public schools. “We need to stop them and GOD will stop them!”

Simon started in with the gays, then paused, putting on a coy exterior of doubt. “Oh, I don’t want to get into this…” before deciding to share his shocking video with the crowd. The lights were dimmed, and he presented a video that he claimed was being shown in schools. It showed a series of families, in which a child introduced us to his/her two mothers or fathers. Each child explained how, despite their differences, they love and protect each other just like any other family does.

The visceral reaction from the crowd was palpable. Audible gasps. Loud cries of “no!!!”, “my God!!”, “how dare they!” It resembled the “2-minute hate” out of Orwell’s 1984, the crowd whipped up into frenzy at the traitorous Goldstein. “This is what we’re up against!” cried Simon.

“Sure, kids drank beer back in my day, but it wasn’t until the gays that they started smoking the dope! ….. We never used to have to lock our doors!”

They culprit was the ubiquitous “They”. “They” took over our government. “They” want gay sex taught to our children. “They control the media! You’re only going to find out about these votes in Frankfort after they happen. That’s no accident. They don’t want you to know about them!”

Such bigotry among fundamentalists has many forbearers. This used to be the argument against “race-mixing”, how the Bible warned against it and it would tear down the fabric of our society. Such bigots were swept to the margins of society after the civil rights movement, but there is always a new “they” to latch onto. And while fomenting hatred towards gays has proved quite successful for the Christian Right, they also know that the gig is up.

Shortly after this AFA meeting, UK had a “coming out week”, where gay and straight students could show solidarity and promote tolerance. At one event, state Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, our first openly gay representative, told the crowd, “When I went to UK, something like this was unheard of. We’ve progressed to the point where this is now possible.”

And that is why we see the vitriol of the Christian right. They know that their loss in the culture war is imminent. A recent poll showed that those under 30 have rejected this brand of bigotry in politics, supporting gay rights in overwhelming numbers. There is even a rift among evangelicals, as a recent NYT article found many churches abandoning the obsession with gays, moving towards the social justice aspect of Christianity.

Tuesday’s election would seem to validate this trend, as Republicans Ernie Fletcher and Stan Lee are expected to lose by nearly 20 points. But victory is not yet upon us, as KY politicians will still seek to capitalize on this homophobic demographic (Even Todd Hollenbach, Dem. candidate for Treasurer, refuses to renounce Simon’s endorsement).

But at least we now know that it will take more than simply using homophobia to get elected in KY.

Of course, if I was Mexican, I’d be sweating a bit.

A telling sign of the sorry state the GOP will be in for a generation

Matt Gunterman October 25th, 2007

The young generation doesn’t like the GOP. Who can blame them? They see right through the party’s demagoguery on race, immigration, sexuality, religion, and health care. The Republicans aren’t even pretending to be building a vision of tomorrow for their party’s and our own future. They’re simply desperately trying to hold onto the power that they have. There’s no future for the GOP, and many Republicans believe that fact literally because they believe our nation should be governed as if the only relevant future event is the second coming of Jesus.

Those last people are fundamentalist Christians, and I think we’re all better off just admitting that they are crazy. Fundamentalist Christians are crazy. Loony. Dangerous. Freakishly churlish. A fierce detriment to American society.

There’s no way around it. We’re seeing the evidence and manifestation of it today.

Anyway, how bad are things for the Republican party today?

Check this out from Josh Marshall at Talking Points Memo:

The Younger Set

You’ve probably seen how Stephen Colbert is running for president. You may even have seen this Rasmussen poll that has Colbert pulling down a respectable 13% of the vote in a hypothetical Rudy-Hillary match-up.

But look at this paragraph down into Rasmussen’s write-up (italics in the original) …

Colbert does particularly well with the younger voters most likely to be watching his show and therefore most aware of his myriad presidential-like qualities. In the match-up with Giuliani and Clinton, Colbert draws 28% of likely voters aged 18-29. He draws 31% of that cohort when his foes are Thompson and Clinton. In both match-ups, Colbert has more support with young voters than the GOP candidate.

There’s something appropriate in this. Americans in their twenties would prefer a normal person pretending to be a Republican buffoon than the real thing.

###

Redneck bigots like to invoke Jesus, but that doesn’t mean Jesus listens

Jim Pence September 6th, 2007

[Message from Matt: Jim's work is ever provocatively ornery, but there are times when it not only captures the humor and mood of the moment when making its point, but also is elevated, quite frankly, to the level of art. If ever MOMA does an exhibit on folk blogging, then Jim Pence and his HillbillyReport will be Exhibit A.]

Gov. Ernie Fletcher (R) and his goons are behaving like bloggers, and that’s a problem

Matt Gunterman August 20th, 2007

I’m pasting today’s Political Notebook from the Courier-Journal’s Joseph Gerth below. It’s especially fun to read today, and he even offers a contest at the end: email him your ideas for doctored photographs of Ernie Fletcher.

Okay, very briefly, let me tell you how I see the world of politics, political journalism, and political blogging evolving in Kentucky.

First, professional political journalists now produce (and will continue to produce in the future) the vast majority of raw factual, objective materials that bloggers use. That’s the case because journalists are trained professionals, they get paid to do what they do full time, and they build up the networks needed to get the information they need to produce their craft.

Second, bloggers — on the left and the right — take the raw material that journalists produce and put it in a partisan context. Now, of course bloggers do upon occasion produce news of their own, but that’s the exception and not the rule. As an aside, I would never, ever, ever want to blog full time. I enjoy my day job too much, which is probably what these journalists would tell you about their experience with blogging, too. There is a real need among political junkies for our partisan context, however. We also spur dialog and provide a platform that allows for ideological issues and differences to be vetted.

In the end, with all this talk in the national media and traditional press about the inherent friction between bloggers and journalists, I think the biggest threat to political journalists, their profession, and trade is apathy among the public and a population that is so disconnected and uninformed from politics that it can’t digest and engage with it at the level of complexity that is needed in an increasingly complex American society.

In short: political bloggers number among political journalists most ardent readers, and political blogging has introduced me to the work of several journalists that I was previously very unaware of. Political blogging and political bloggers, as they both mature as a medium and community, might well serve to strengthen and broaden the impact of political journalism.

That having been said, I want to say that I’m a little bit disturbed by the behavior of Governor Ernie Fletcher (R) and his goons as of late. This altering of the image of Democratic candidate Steve Beshear takes the cake. Why?

As a transparently and viciously partisan and vicious blogger, I can and do say very ornery things about incompetent Republicans in Kentucky. That’s the luxury of being a blogger, especially one sitting a thousand miles away in the quiet seclusion of Yale’s Sterling Memorial Library, where the only thing distracting me at the moment is a beautiful creature standing a few feet away from me and looking at the New Standard Jewish Encyclopedia.

I doctor photographs, like this one and this one. I say things like, “Ernie Fletcher has a vagina up his asshole,” and, “Robbie Rudolph is a redneck idiot with no formal education,” and, “Stan Lee mixing his Christian fundamentalism with our politics makes him no better than a radical Islamicist.” I say these things because there’s a lot of truth to them and I say these things because I can. If you don’t like it, you don’t have to read my blog.

Yet, when our governor and his campaign start behaving like me, I think it betrays a great deal–that we already knew–about why the Fletcher administration is where it is. Ernie Fletcher and his goons never really understood the gravity and responsibility of the office and the unique opportunity they’ve been given. They still don’t understand it, and they never will understand it. But the people of Kentucky do understand it, and that’s why they’ll elect Steve Beshear this November.

Monday, August 20, 2007

Joseph Gerth | Political Notebook
Look before you leap

State Auditor Crit Luallen recently produced an audit mildly critical of the way state tourism funds have been spent, saying that Kentucky needs to develop a better strategic plan for spending new marketing money and determining if the money was spent wisely.

That upset at least one Republican blogger, Jessamine County Attorney Brian Goettl, of Conservativeedge.com, who asked in a headline: “What does LuAllen know about tourism?”

In the blog report, Goettl goes on to ask, “What does LuAllen know about tourism or marketing? What does her audit staff know about it? I would venture to say very little … LuAllen has no business making such pronouncements unless she can demonstrate her competence in the area or show that she relied on competent experts.”

Well. Luallen, a Democrat, points out that she served as tourism secretary under former Gov. Brereton Jones and continued to work on tourism projects as executive cabinet secretary under former Gov. Paul Patton.

During her time in those two roles, the state expanded or built convention centers in Louisville and Northern Kentucky, passed a $100 million bond issue to upgrade state parks and saw the private development of numerous attractions, including the Newport Aquarium, Louisville’s 4th Street Live and Kentucky Speedway, which she said were partly the result of changes she and the administrations she worked for sought in state law.

“The record is there,” she said. “I have a strong background in marketing, in economic development and in tourism and that was one reason we looked at this issue.”

Goettl said in an interview that he would like to review Luallen’s record as tourism secretary more closely before determining whether she and her office are qualified to make such recommendations.

The doctoring is in

Last week state Republican Chairman Steve Robertson said that doctoring photos is fair game in the governor’s race between Gov. Ernie Fletcher and his Democratic opponent, former Lt. Gov. Steve Beshear.

In its first salvo, the party unveiled brochures that have Beshear’s head Photoshopped onto a body wearing a white blazer, a white, open-collar shirt and a necklace, leaning against a roulette table and holding a glass of what looks to be white wine.

“Easy Money Steve” they call him because of his proposal to bring casino gambling, and $500 million annually in revenue, to Kentucky.

But we were a bit surprised by Democratic Party Chairman Jonathan Miller’s response condemning the practice. We figured the Democrats would view the Republican attack as tacit approval for such shenanigans if they chose to do the same.

If you were running Beshear’s campaign, how would you doctor a photo of Fletcher? And if you were running Fletcher’s campaign, how would you follow up the “Easy Money Steve” brochure?

E-mail me at jgerth@courier-journal.com, and we may run some of your responses in upcoming weeks.

Poll dancing

Last week we led with a couple of items about a poll by the Lexington public relations firm of Preston-Osborne, which drew questions on the Courier-Journal Web site from some readers who wondered if we had been “snookered.”

The poll, commissioned by The Lane Report, a Lexington business journal, dealt with issues ranging from the governor’s race to casino gaming and seemed to give Democratic gubernatorial nominee Steve Beshear an edge on several fronts.

The basic argument that we had been “snookered” is that Preston-Osborne was founded by Tommy Preston, a longtime friend of Beshear, and the firm also has a contract to do public relations work with the Kentucky Equine Education Project, which supports casinos.

The fact of the matter is that Preston sold his interest in the firm to Phil Osborne in 1997 and hasn’t been involved in the company since (although he and Osborne are friends and still talk regularly). As far as the KEEP connection, Osborne notes that if he fudged numbers for one client to benefit another, he wouldn’t be in business very long.

I don’t doubt he’s correct on that. But what ultimately led us to run the Lane Report results was the fact that the numbers were right in line with other polling data we’ve seen, which gives them some measure of reliability.
Outta here

I’ll be taking some much-needed vacation over the next two weeks. The column should return Sept. 10 but keep the cards and letters coming. I’ll be checking e-mails while I’m away.

Justice Breyer: Here’s what bigot, hate-monger KY State Rep. Stan Lee (R) and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad Have in Common

Matt Gunterman August 13th, 2007

Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer offers us a new paradigm for looking at the world, one quite different from President George W. Bush’s “you’re with us or against us,” or his “axis of evil,” or even outside the realm of that bogeyman “Islamofascism.”

Yes, Breyer’s suggestion is rather asymmetrical in nature and design; he describes a phenomenon that transcends national boundaries and nationalism.

It’s an assault on reason; it’s a way of looking at the world that places fundamentalist Christian bigots and hate-mongers, like State Representative Stan Lee (R), who would love nothing more than to stuff his narrow brand of religion down the throats of all Kentuckians, with radical Islamic bigots and hate-mongers, like Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?).

I think it explains the state of things rather well.

From ThinkProgress:

Breyer sees assault on reason.

The Supreme Court’s most recent term was a difficult one, Justice Stephen Breyer said Saturday, because he found himself on the losing end of several key cases. After the 9/11, attacks, Breyer said: “I began to see that the true division of importance in the world is not between different countries. The important division is between those who are committed to reason, to working out things, to understanding other people, to peaceful resolution of their differences … and those who don’t think that.”

Republican Congressman: non-Christians in Congress “not what was envisioned by the Founding Fathers”

Matt Gunterman August 10th, 2007

I bet Kentucky State Representative and Republican attorney general candidate Stan Lee, a bigot and hate-monger of the first order, considers U.S. Representative Bill Sali (R-ID) a man after his own heart.

Via ThinkProgress:

Rep. Bill Sali: Religious Diversity In Congress ‘Was Not Envisioned By The Founding Fathers’

When Idaho State Rep. Bill Sali was running for Congress in 2006, Vice President Cheney visited his state and said, “Bill is ready to make a difference in Washington, and he’s going to be the kind of Congressman who will make you proud.” Now-Congressman Bill Sali (R-ID) is demonstrating his worth by criticizing the new religious diversity embodied in the 110th Congress:

We have not only a Hindu prayer being offered in the Senate, we have a Muslim member of the House of Representatives now, Keith Ellison from Minnesota. Those are changes — and they are not what was envisioned by the Founding Fathers.

Really? Sali may want to take a peek at Article VI of the Constitution, which notes that there is no religious test for public office:

[...]

Sali’s not alone in his bigotry. In Dec. 2006, shortly after Rep. Keith Ellison (D-MN) was elected as the first Muslim congressman, Rep. Virgil Goode (R-VA) warned that “American citizens” need to “wake up” or “there will likely be many more Muslims elected to office.”

Last month, protestors belonging to the Christian Right anti-abortion group Operation Save America loudly interrupted the first Hindu prayer delivered in the Senate. Sali said that when a Hindu prayer is offered, it “creates problems for the longevity of this country.”

Big Government? Big Lie! (And Other Matters of Note)

Terri Whitehouse August 1st, 2007

The Courier-Journal today ran an insightful piece written by E.J. Dionne Jr. on the myth of “big government.” Big government is, of course, a scare tactic used to justify lots of awful things, from lax gun control laws to not providing for the nation’s poor. Just exactly how big our government has actually gotten under the leadership of a Republican president, however, is worth a closer look.

In slightly unrelated news, Mark Hebert reports that nearly two-thirds of Kentuckians want some sort of U.S. troop withdrawal in Iraq.

Also, I’ve been meaning to blog about abstinence-only (mis)education for a number of weeks now, but Mary Q. Burton at the LEO does such a first-rate job in “Sex, lies and abstinence” that I’ll just quote in part:

Teri Lloyd was surprised when the sex education books her children brought home from school seemed woefully incomplete. The books omitted certain parts of the female anatomy — specifically, the clitoris.

“That’s got to be a shame, fear-based thing,” says Lloyd, 49, whose daughter, now 23, attended school at Myers Middle. “We just failed to educate them about their own bodies. What we leave out can be shaming, too. I wondered why that part wasn’t mentioned. I’m not opposed to teaching abstinence; what I’m opposed to is pairing it with shame or with lack of information about birth control and the human body.”

They can give enough of my tax money to fund religious anti-choice pregnancy centers, but can’t find a few hundred bucks for an accurate scientific rendering of the female anatomy? Nice.

Kentucky’s commonsense majority is standing up to fundamentalist Christians; defeat of Fletcher and Lee this November first big step

Matt Gunterman August 1st, 2007

Whenever the church doors are open, my family is there. For worship, that’s thrice weekly, but with all the meetings and activities that the congregation plans, it’s usually more frequent than that.

When I was running for office last year, the congregation’s minister, who had been with the church for less than a year and who was finally getting an inkling that I was a liberal, asked me if I’d hire an open gay man or lesbian to work in my office if I won. I said yes, of course, I’d hire any qualified person. He was horrified: how could I do something like that and publicly endorse that practice?

So, I asked the preacher, “Do you think Baptists are going to hell? Isn’t that what we teach and believe here?” Because, you see, my religious tradition believes that salvation only comes by way of baptism by immersion for the remission of sins, and Baptists are not baptized for that reason. Ergo: they are damned.

He replied yes. Then I asked the obvious follow-up question, “If I hire a Baptist, who is ably and amply qualified, am I similarly making a statement to the community at large that I endorse that religion, which I personally and we as a congregation believe to be a path to destruction and against the will of God?”

That was the end of that conversation.

You may not agree with my religious beliefs, but let’s all thank the Lord that I keep them where they belong: in me, my family, and my congregation.

When we start injecting our religious beliefs into the public sphere and into the nation’s politics, it’s a slippery slope of whose religion is the preferred religion, the one that dictates what all the rest of us can and can’t do with our lives. In a nation where the supposed will of God — and not commonsense and reason — determines what’s right and wrong and what’s legal and illegal, who do we empower to determine what the will of God is and what is sinful?

I don’t know why some people. like Representative Stan Lee (R) and, sadly, my own Representative Jim Gooch (D), who also attended the hate rally put on by the Family Foundation this week, are so immature in their Christian faith that they believe it’s their duty to force the world to conform to their narrow versions of Christianity. My reading of the scriptures shows that Jesus taught us to share His message, not ram it down anyone’s throat. And mature folk understand that rational and thinking people can and will refuse to accept what we share. It’s not irrational to deny Christ; I think most of the Greek bible authors admitted that Christians were a “peculiar” people for their beliefs, which defied commonsense. So, mature folk should be able to live in harmony with people and a world that deny that Christ and God have any bearing on their lives.

It’s time Kentucky stands up to the fundamentalist Christians and shuns them as the unstable element of society that they are.

The defeat of fundamentalists like Governor Ernie Fletcher (R) and Stan Lee will be the first big step in that process.

Here’s an excellent editorial from today’s Courier-Journal:

Marriage Is Safe

The decision by two of Kentucky’s public university boards to offer domestic partner benefits is no threat to marriage. That’s the truth.

No matter how many little gatherings of grim-faced, self-appointed pietists the Family Foundation of Kentucky stages, the facts remain the same. Under Kentucky law, marriage remains what it always has been: a union of one man and one woman. The state constitution has been amended to emphasize the point.

Trustees at the campuses in Lexington and Louisville have done nothing to change the law. They’re just trying to make sure everyone in their university families has access to health care. What they’ve done is pro-life and pro-family.

Some of the demonstrators against domestic partner benefits at this week’s Capitol rotunda rally held signs that said, “Marriage: God’s Way.” They were asserting a Christian basis for their protest.

Nobody mentioned Matthew 25: 36, which says, “I was sick, and ye visited me,” not, “Ye visited my partner and me, and told him to fend for himself.”

Senate President David Williams, R-Burkesville, stood in front of a sign that read “PROTECT MARRIAGE,” a scene that had a sort of humor of its own.

What the Republicans want is to protect the marriage of convenience between anti-gay bigotry and Gov. Ernie Fletcher’s re-election prospects.

Remember, as Attorney General Greg Stumbo points out, Dr. Fletcher appointed nine trustees who voted in favor of domestic partner benefits.

The fact is, those trustees acted to help the University of Kentucky and the University of Louisville compete for some of the nation’s best teachers, scholars and researchers.

Republicans relentlessly praise the wisdom of business, and those who run businesses. Perhaps they haven’t noticed that the number of Fortune 500 companies offering domestic partner health insurance benefits has risen from only one in 1992 to more than 250 today.

Fully 86 percent of those top corporations have banned discrimination based on sexual orientation — not only because it’s the just thing to do but because it makes good business sense.

Ask the Conference Board, which bills itself as the world’s preeminent business membership and research organization. It has, for over 90 years, “equipped the world’s leading corporations with practical knowledge. …”

Listen to Ellen Galinsky, from the Conference Board’s Work Life leadership Council:

“Ultimately it comes down to an economic decision. If you want to meet the needs of employees and your customers, then you have to accept that this country is diverse.”

That’s the truth too.

Fanatical Christians Invade U.S. Senate to Interrupt Hindu Prayer

Matt Gunterman July 12th, 2007

First, we know that President George W. Bush has packed his administration with over 150 graduates of a Virginia-based, fundamentalist Christian college, founded by radical cleric Pat Robertson. These Bush hires have been at the center of nearly every scandal to hit the administration.

Second, a “radical Christian activist group” in Texas has been going around bombing other churches that the bombers themselves don’t consider to be pure, holy, and true enough. The group is rather disorganized at the moment, but the trend is nevertheless frightening.

Third, a radical Christian group invaded the U.S. Senate chambers today to interrupt a prayer being led by an American Hindu. They were arrested, and the prayer continued. Here’s the video.

We’re seeing a disturbing trend, I think, and I believe it will only intensify in the coming years as the majority of the nation moves towards a more inclusive, tolerant agenda to replace the one of hate and fear being carried out by the Bush administration. I think these people, while being small in number, will only radicalize more.

What are Mitch McConnell conservatives in Kentucky trying to conserve?

Matt Gunterman June 26th, 2007

There are competing “brands” of conservatism in the United States. Senator Mitch McConnell (R) has his own, and it’s certainly the dominant political ideology in the state and the one that guides the largest faction of the Kentucky GOP.

Other states that are governed by brands of conservatism, ones that differ from McConnell’s — which is far less about ideological purity and far more about the grabbing on of and holding on to of power at all costs — get results from their state’s conservative leadership that varies starkly from our own.

While much of the South and many of Kentucky’s neighbors are likewise dominated by conservatives and have significant elements of their populations subscribing to some sort of conservative philosophy, whether religious or secular, those other places have enjoyed substantially more and prolonged prosperity relative to Kentucky. Both their economies and population growth have been outperforming our state’s, and their general quality of life has been increasing at a faster pace by most measures than our own.

Why? What’s the difference with conservatives in Kentucky? It all has to do with Mitch McConnell’s specific brand of conservatism. McConnell’s political machine doesn’t operate on meritocracy. In fact, McConnell doesn’t recruit or attract dynamic talent — in both the intellectual and creative senses — because dynamic talent, by its very nature, will look to improve the machine; it will try to pump new energy and better ideas into the system.

McConnell doesn’t want that because McConnell likes his operational environment to be one of his own control. He took on this fetish when he was a boy, stricken with polio and confined to bed. It was through control and sheer willpower that he ever walked again, and the lesson he took from that experience was one of being master of one’s environment: and if that environment is constantly in flux — is dynamic — then it’s harder to exercise control and understanding.

There is very little talent in the Kentucky GOP. There are people who rise to the top and do so quickly, but it’s because of the loyalty that they demonstrate to the status quo. This lack of talent is why the Kentucky GOP is flailing at the moment. It has no-one in its ranks to inject any new charisma and identity into the brand. It only knows how it has gained and held onto control in the past, and that’s why we are all witnessing the silliness of the last few months from Kentucky Republicans, the latest episode being the head of the state party playing the “gay card” again.

It’s all they have: politics. They have no ideas. They have no energy. They have no hope. They have no faith in America. They have no future.

So, the next time some Kentuckian tells you that they’re a proud conservative, you just ask them what it is precisely they’re trying to conserve in this state?

Is it our outstanding record of moral values, our tendency for tolerance, our love of education, our grand economy?

I’d like to know.

The Bigot Writes an Editorial

Joe Sonka June 25th, 2007

Our favorite mustached bigot writes an editorial in the Courier-Journal about how domestic partner benefits will destroy, I say DESTROY traditional marriage.

I think I’ve finally figured this out, correct me if I’m off base. We have Stan Lee, who obviously has had some issues growing up about his sexuality. In order to defend himself from anyone who might catch on to his sexual confusion, he puts on a lifelong front of virulent hatred of homosexuals, so that no one will question his hetero manliness. But why this fear of something as innocuous as health benefits for domestic partners? As Ned says, the universities are trying to "systematically dismantle marriage in our society". I think what Ned fears is that sexually ambiguous married folk like himself, when presented with the public and visible acceptance of homosexual couples, will be unable to resist their urges. Therefore, waves of such men will be forced to divorce their wives, now presented with the option to follow their repressed sexual urges.

Well, at least that’s the only explanation that makes sense to me. Maybe I’m wrong. That, or he’s just a crude, hateful and immoral politician that is making political gain by tapping into hatred of unpopular people.

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Religious fundamentalists are destroying the nation’s economic competitive edge

Matt Gunterman June 24th, 2007

The Courier-Journal ran an excellent editorial this Sunday that asked all the thinking fiscal conservatives who have aligned themselves with the Kentucky GOP in recent years to seriously reconsider their allegiance to and alliance with the Republican party’s fanatical social conservatives and religious fundamentalists.

There are about four billion people on this planet who aren’t Christian, and the nations their building aren’t ones that obsess about the Second Coming of Christ.

I mean, we have a man — Representative Stan Lee (R) — who’s running for attorney general of this state who wants to make Christianity the official religion of the land, who wants to teach Creationism in our schools as “science,” and whose personal legislative agenda is to stamp out homosexuality and homosexuals in Kentucky.

People like Stan Lee and all the people who follow his sort of creed are sapping this nation of the competitive edge it will need to survive and prosper in the 21st century.

We aren’t living in a global vacuum. Other nations aren’t going to be obsessed with building “Christian paradise,” and will instead be focused on building institutions of learning that produce top scholars and scientists and on creating nimble economies to rival our own.

In truth, people like hate-monger Stan Lee believe the nation’s calling is to prepare for the End Times. I have no problem with people believing their religion and applying its tenets to their own lives, but it’s absolute crazy talk to say it should be something the rest of the nation should be concerned about.

Let’s hope the fiscal conservatives do take a stand against the delusional religious fanatics in the GOP.

The GOP’s choice

Today, Kentucky Republicans are faced with a clear choice: What kind of party — and what kind of people — do they want to be?

Do the party’s solid businessmen and women really want to follow its social-conservative wing into a university-bashing battle over domestic partner benefits?

How comfortable can they be contributing their time, money and good names to Ernie Fletcher’s reelection campaign, now that his handpicked state party chairman has made it clear that a big part of their strategy will be to throw red meat to the anti-gay crowd?

Does that seem like an exaggeration? It’s not.

GOP chairman Steve Robertson had been on the job for less than three weeks before — as his first public act — he sent out an infantile opinion piece to newspapers, all but calling two Democratic candidates gay and inciting anti-academic hysteria over the issue of domestic partner benefits.

Certainly these are not the issues or tactics that education-minded, New Economy-building Republicans want to embrace. Kentucky ranks near the bottom in too many areas, and most Republicans no doubt long to focus not on keeping it there, but on making it a more educated, competitive and prosperous place.

Need proof? The decision to offer modest benefits to the unmarried partners of University of Louisville and University of Kentucky employees was made by the prominent business people, many of them Republicans, who make up their boards.

Go to the universities’ Websites and look at the names. They are CEOs, bankers, developers, a former director of the Kentucky Chamber of Commerce. Gov. Fletcher himself appointed about half.

These people — not left-wing radicals — decided what our universities need to be competitive.

As former Jefferson County Republican Party chairman Bill Stone, a U of L trustee, said the day that board voted 14-1 to offer domestic partner benefits, “This is not an endorsement of gay marriage or any of the other lightning issues. This is simply a recognition that people are people. You only restrict your opportunities for greatness when you restrict your opportunities to attract all kinds of folks.”

Domestic partner benefits will make a difference to a very small number of university employees. But if it helps attract, say, an Aaron Copland to a music department or a Gore Vidal to a writing program, that helps Kentucky kids.

The business wing of the GOP knows this. It’s time for them to make themselves heard. No — it’s past time.

If they let the social conservatives dominate this higher education issue, what will be next? Science curricula acceptable to the creationist crowd?

More Creationist Wingnuttery, Wearing a Tinfoil Hat

Joe Sonka June 12th, 2007

This letter to the editor was actually published in a Kentucky newspaper. I think its a pretty good representation of the kind of mindset and mental health that it takes to believe that Adam and Eve played fetch with dinosaurs 6,000 years ago while their kids were busy fucking.

Let me just summarize the wonderful pontification in the letter. The evolution “mythology” and science being taught in our schools is “dumbing down” our kids. This is being taught so the “Illuminati” and the Rockefeller family can control our kids. Oh, and they control the Federal Reserve and engage in occult activities, too. Also, her family loved the Creation Museum and the animatronic dinosaurs “concretely prove that God created the heavens and the earth”.

I really do hope that they chose to run this because it was funny, or they accidentally ran some wonderfully crafted snark.

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Fun at the Creation Museum!!!

Joe Sonka June 9th, 2007

I went to the truly insane “Creation Museum” last Saturday and have my full report up on BlueGrassRoots.

I’m a big fan of dark, unintentional humor, and that’s exactly what I got in my visit. What’s certainly not funny is that I could definitely see certain “Christian Academies” across the State (that teach Creationism in their school) bringing their students here on field trips. To call that child abuse would be appropriate in my opinion.

It also reinforces many, many negative stereotypes about Kentucky.

Another relevant question is how do our representatives stand on the museum? Do they endorse its views? Would they take their children there? Is this an appropriate field trip for students?

I haven’t heard any politicians take on this yet, and I’d be interested to hear it.

Anyway, I leave you a picture of Pebbles Flintstone and her pet Velaciraptor, Dino.




Credentials don’t tell the whole story about Dr. James Holsinger

Matt Gunterman June 7th, 2007

Polwatchers blog is reporting that a conservative blogger posted this statement today in regards to the growing furor over Dr. James Holsinger and his consistently homophobic agenda:

And who are we supposed to believe about the health effects of homosexuality anyway: some guy with a list of medical credentials a mile long? Or the medical geniuses over at places like the Fairness Alliance, Soulforce, and the Human Rights Campaign?

As an historian of medicine, I can tell you that the past of the modern American medical profession is littered with people who had all sorts of nice degrees and credentials but who carried out terrible injustices and painful experiments against other human beings. In the United States, these sorts of medical horrors were usually carried out against slaves, blacks, the mentally ill, and very much so homosexuals.

The most extreme example in history of this sort of phenomenon was no doubt the Nazi doctors, like Dr. Josef Mengele, who did a number of medical experiments using twins at Auschwitz. None of the twins came out alive. Or there was Dr. Carl Clauberg, who in his experiments aimed x-rays at people’s sex organs until they were cooked. Or Dr. Herta Oberheuser, who injected toxic chemicals into the bodies of patients to the point of death. Or Dr. Karl Brandt who carried out executions of invalids that he “medically” diagnosed as a burden on the Nazi machine.

Just because a person has an education and credentials doesn’t mean that he or she can’t be driven to dangerous extremes by ideology or religious fervor.

Take for instance Kentucky’s most rabid bigot in elected office: Republican State Senator Richard “Dick” Roeding, who had this to say about homosexuals when the University of Louisville was discussing overing domestic partner benefits to same-sex couples in order to be unfettered in its ability to attract and retain top academic talent:

I don’t want to entice any of those people into our state. Those are the wrong kind of people.

Yes, Dick Roeding is a churlish bigot, but he’s also a churlish bigot with a degree in pharmaceutical chemistry.

Somehow I don’t think Holsinger’s nomination will survive this latest bit of nonsense

Matt Gunterman June 6th, 2007

Will this bit of nonsense from Bush surgeon general nominee and University of Kentucky faculty member James W. Holsinger be the straw that breaks the nominating camel’s back? It’s disappointing — and I believe I’m remembering this correctly — that both the Louisville Courier-Journal and the Lexington Herald-Leader editorial boards endorsed this man’s nomination.

Gay group attacks Holsinger paper
1991 CHURCH REPORT ARGUED MALE SEX UNHEALTHY, UNNATURAL

By Sarah Vos

In 1991, Dr. James W. Holsinger — a University of Kentucky professor who is President Bush’s nominee for U.S. surgeon general — wrote a paper arguing that gay sex is biologically unnatural and unhealthy.

Like male and female pipe fittings, certain male and female body parts are designed for each other, Holsinger wrote in a paper prepared for a United Methodist Church committee studying homosexuality. “When the complementarity of the sexes is breached, injuries and diseases may occur,” Holsinger wrote in the paper, titled Pathophysiology of Male Homosexuality.

The paper was released Monday by the Human Rights Campaign, a national group that advocates for gay and lesbian rights. UK spokeswoman Mary Margaret Colliver confirmed that Holsinger had written the paper. Holsinger declined to comment for this story, as he has not been confirmed by the U.S. Senate.

[...]

I don’t think any of us needs me to point out that, excluding the sex organs, males and females have exactly the same orifices on their bodies, and those female orifices are just as capable of being used for sexual purposes as the male ones.

And, of course, the biggest problem here is that Holsinger, whom Bush wants to make the nation’s chief medical officer, is shown here, as the article points out, pathologizing homosexual practices to make his religious point. Why not just quote some scripture and leave the science to the realms of scientists? The mainstream medical community de-medicalized homosexual behavior decades ago.

Church…..and……State

Joe Sonka June 5th, 2007

The Bowling Green Daily Post has a wingnut editorial up demanding that the 10 Commandments immediately be put up on Capitol grounds. Otherwise, I’m guessing that evil spirits will work their way into the capitol building and make the legislators start worshiping Satan and performing human sacrifice rituals and gay orgies. Or even start (gasp) lying, taking bribes and cheating on their wives. Yes, some good ole time religion in the Capitol will save us from this.

And who joins the BG Daily News in this passioned, urgent plea?

Ned Flanders, of course. Says Stan Lee, “The General Assembly spoke on the issue. The governor signed the bill. Whoever is charged with doing this needs to be working post haste.”

Don’t make Ned Flanders angry. You won’t like him when he’s angry.

How soon before Stan Lee proposes legislation to build a giant crucifix on the House floor?

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

In 20 years, we’ll look at Rep. Stan Lee as this kind of idiot, too

Matt Gunterman June 5th, 2007

The Courier-Journal published the text from the Loving v. Virginia 1967 Supreme Court decision that struck down laws banning interracial marriage. They also have a nice op-ed from Kermit Roosevelt that essentially argues that same-sex marriage is coming, and society will adapt, and that in the future society will look back on opposition to same-sex marriage and wonder how people today could have been so blindly bigoted.

And, that’s how it will be. It doesn’t take an historian to figure it out. Of course, hate-monger Representative Stan Lee (R) is probably holding out for the Rapture before that time has passed.

In reading the text of the Court’s decision, I couldn’t help but find the paragraph that I’ve emboldened below strikingly familiar to something that Stan Lee would utter.

[...]

In June 1958, two residents of Virginia, Mildred Jeter, a Negro woman, and Richard Loving, a white man, were married in the District of Columbia pursuant to its laws. Shortly after their marriage, the Lovings returned to Virginia and established their marital abode in Caroline County. At the October Term, 1958, of the Circuit Court of Caroline County, a grand jury issued an indictment charging the Lovings with violating Virginia’s ban on interracial marriages. On January 6, 1959, the Lovings pleaded guilty to the charge and were sentenced to one year in jail; however, the trial judge suspended the sentence for a period of 25 years on the condition that the Lovings leave the State and not return to Virginia together for 25 years. He stated in an opinion that:

“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”

[...]

We have to start calling out nutters like Stan Lee with increasing frequency. These sorts of people need to be socially and culturally marginalized, or we’ll never be rid of their bigotry that’s a plague on our nation that’s holding us back, intellectually and scientifically.

Is Rep. Stan Lee’s faith, which he says guides him in his career and campaign for attorney general, anti-Catholic?

Matt Gunterman May 30th, 2007

First off, can anyone tell me why Representative Stan Lee’s campaign website for attorney general is hosted on Representative Kevin D. Bratcher’s personal website: http://www.bratcher.cc/stan_lee.htm?

Second, Stan Lee declares all over this campaign website that, in his own words, he first and foremost “is guided by his faith” and that he “is honored to serve as an Elder at his church for over 10 years,” and that church is Hill-n-Dale Christian Church in Lexington.

So, since Lee has admitted that his faith will be at the very center of what guides him as attorney general if he should win, I think we have a vested interest as concerned citizens and voters to know something more about that faith.

Also, since Lee is an authoritative leader in that congregation, what is said in the pulpit there bears his mark of approval. If it didn’t, he could certainly do something about it because he’s in a position to do so.

I submit to you excerpts from a Sunday, March 25, 2007 sermon entitled “When God Calls Your Name,” preached by Hill-n-Dale Christian Church senior minister Phil Roberts. The audio is here.

In this sermon, Roberts disparages a pilgrimage site in the state of Georgia and accuses those behind it of being motivated by “profit” and not faith. Who’s behind it? An organization that calls itself Our Loving Mother’s Children. Their website, which Roberts references in his sermon, states that the organization “and its volunteers are the heirs of a long tradition of people who believe that, from time to time, God acts in unique and miraculous ways.”

You are asked to donate money on the website, but it’s to build a new Catholic church, and last time I looked that’s not a terribly profitable enterprise, quite frankly.

Here’s Roberts’ own words from 10:15-11:16 on the audio that’s linked above. The “Lisa” he references is Roberts’ wife:

[...]

Lisa here, her hometown is Conyers, Georgia. It’s a nice little town. Not terribly exciting, but a nice town, uh, but if you were to go to a website called conyers.org here’s what you’d read about Conyers, Georgia.

It says, “Conyers is where the Blessed Mother appeared 49 times on the 13th of the month from 1990 to 1998.”

1998, incidentally, is when the IRS started to crack down a little bit.

It says, “Well over a million pilgrims have visited the site, with several gatherings estimated at over 100,000. Conyers is a holy site where untold numbers have experienced healing, conversion and a deeper relationship with Christ and Our Loving Mother, the Blessed Virgin Mary.”

Well, God is in the business of calling people and making himself known, but maybe not like that.

And you know, frankly, many non-believing people have been turned off by these hard-to-believe God sightings that usually center around turning a profit. And so many of them as a result have drawn the opposite conclusion that God just doesn’t speak at all in today’s world.

[…]

What I think’s really funny is that Roberts disparages believers for seeing visions and manifestations of God, but undoubtedly he’s wholly fine with God speaking to his own congregation. I guess seeing things makes you crazy, but only hearing things makes you full of the faith. See below (this begins at 18:42 on the audio):

Can you picture God saying “Hill-n-Dale! Hill-n-Dale!” I mean isn’t it amazing to look back over the last 26 years and think that along the way God has been saying with enthusiasm the name of this church and calling out for a response. And you know, for a church as well as for individuals, we’ve got two options there. One is, we can say will you leave me alone I’m just trying to get some sleep here, or we can say speak Lord, for your servants are listening.

My recommendation: get more sleep.

Is Representative Stan Lee qualified to be an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church?

Matt Gunterman May 30th, 2007

Republican State Representative Stan Lee is one of the most freakishly superstitious and comically unreasoned people in the legislature.

Mark Nickolas has well documented this fact for some time now at the Bluegrass Report. For a good primer on the subject, see “The Frightening Fanaticism Of Attorney General Candidate Stan Lee (R).”

Also of interest is Media Czech’s take on Lee’s strange, out-of-the-mainstream behavior in his rather humorous “Atheist Voting Guide to Fall 2007 KY Elections.”

I must say, if you haven’t read this account of Stan Lee telling perfect strangers in his office about the impending arrival of the End Times, then you must read it. It’s crazy talk from the man.

Now, pretty much all of Stan Lee’s campaign literature mentions that he is an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church in Lexington.

I am, in fact, a practicing Campbellite just like Stan Lee (only I’m of the Church of Christ persuasion, like Jody Richards, but I’m probably far more liberal in my theology than Richards, but I might be wrong on that, but I’m probably not).

And, as a fellow Campbellite, I know all about elders of the church and their qualifications (elders are also called bishops, and they are appointed by and from within the various independent congregations). Those qualifications are spelled out in 1 Timothy 3:1-7 and they are:

1 Timothy 3:1-7

1: This is a true saying, If a man desire the office of a bishop, he desireth a good work.
2: A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;
3: Not given to wine, no striker, not greedy of filthy lucre; but patient, not a brawler, not covetous;
4: One that ruleth well his own house, having his children in subjection with all gravity;
5: (For if a man know not how to rule his own house, how shall he take care of the church of God?)
6: Not a novice, lest being lifted up with pride he fall into the condemnation of the devil.
7: Moreover he must have a good report of them which are without; lest he fall into reproach and the snare of the devil.

Now, Stan Lee and people who think like him believe that they can use their interpretations of the scriptures in the political process to dictate how I can live out my own secular life.

I wholeheartedly agree that Stan Lee and his fellow elders are within their rights to regulate their own congregation via those interpretations. In fact, if I were a member of Hill-n-Dale Christian Church, the eldership there would be more than welcome to disfellowship me; I would wear the mark with pride.

Where Stan Lee and his posse are wrong is that those beliefs have any business dictating the political and civil rights of the American citizenry. For example, two secular issues that Stan Lee seems to think are the business of his superstition are reproductive rights and same-sex marriage.

So, I say let’s reverse the flow. Let’s use the scriptures to judge Stan Lee and see if he’s qualified to be an elder at Hill-n-Dale Christian Church. Lee uses his status as an elder in his campaign, so it’s entirely fair game.

Stan Lee is unqualified to be an elder of the church, a shepherd of the flock, a bishop of the bride of Christ because the public record shows that his temperament is not sober, he is not of good behavior, he is not given to hospitality, is impatient, is an argumentative brawler, and he most certainly does not have a good report with those of us who are without.

For more on the qualifications of elders, see this handy little website.

They may be the new evangelists, but they’re spreading the same old crazy crap

Matt Gunterman May 29th, 2007

This piece by Hanna Rosin appeared in Tuesday’s Courier-Journal from the Washington Post.

I’m simply flabbergasted at the content of this piece. Should we laugh, cry, or be afraid … be very afraid.

The New Evangelists

WASHINGTON — To the Bush haters of America, the young Monica Goodling is a footnote of this wretched era, one of the many Washington types that they’ll be happy to get rid of come January 2009: Venal Vice President, Ex-Lobbyists Turned Regulators and, in Goodling’s case, Young Evangelicals in High Places.

[...]

Goodling is part of a new generation of evangelicals ushered in by Falwell, who insisted that Christians get involved in politics. They are graduates of the exploding number of evangelical colleges, which no longer aim to create a parallel subculture but instead to train “Christian leaders to change the world,” as the Regent mission statement reads.

It used to be that being 33 and in charge of 93 U.S. attorneys would mean you’d been top of your class at Harvard or Yale or clerked at the Supreme Court. Now, Christian schools are joining that mix. Regent has had 150 of its graduates working in the White House; the school estimates that one-sixth of its alumni are in government work. Call them the Goodlings: scrubbed young ideologues, ready to serve their nation, the right’s version of the Peace Corps generation.

The image of Goodling that emerged in the hearing did not match the “hayseed” of Maher’s imagination. A colleague said that it was not unusual to find Goodling BlackBerrying at 2 a.m. or preparing briefs late into the night. Goodling described one bit of office politics as a clash between two “Type A” women in which she played the Eve Harrington character in “All About Eve” and won. “Televangelist” did not seem to be on her list of career goals.

Falwell and Robertson were outsiders and always behaved like it. Goodling’s Christian contemporaries grew up with Bush as their president, speaking their language. Even after this administration is gone, they can work for one of the more than 150 members of Congress who call themselves evangelical or dozens of conservative think tanks and activist groups. Or they can run for office: Robert McDonnell, Virginia’s attorney general, is a Regent alum. They are part of the Washington establishment now, and, much to Bill Maher’s chagrin, they will be around long after Bush is gone.

Recently, I spent a lot of time among the students at Patrick Henry College, a seven-year-old school founded in much the same spirit as Regent. The students there easily matched Goodling’s description of herself as “anal retentive.” They input their daily schedules into Palm Pilots in 15-minute increments — read Bible, do crunches, take shower, study for Latin quiz. They intern at the White House. The atmosphere is much more Harvard than Bob Jones.

A 1996 study found that evangelical college students were remarkably unified in their political identification: More than two-thirds called themselves Republicans, and only 9 percent said they were Democrats.

At Patrick Henry, I heard a rumor that someone had voted for John Kerry. I chased down many leads. All dead ends. If it was true, no one would publicly admit it.

While testifying this week, Goodling admitted that she had asked inappropriately partisan questions of applicants for civil service jobs. But she never asked about religion, she said. Unlike their elders, the new generation of evangelicals does not turn the cubicle into a pulpit. If they are intent on implementing God’s will, they do it with professional discretion.

It took the conservative political movement 30 years to become a fixture in American politics, and it’s taken evangelicals about the same. Like conservatives, evangelicals may remain chronically ambivalent, afflicted with a persecution complex despite their obvious successes. But they are embedded firmly enough into Washington to provide jobs for smart young Christians for generations to come.

Hanna Rosin, who covered religion for The Washington Post, is the author of “God’s Harvard: A Christian College on a Mission to Save America,” due out in September.

It’s time to call them what they are: crazy or disingenuous

Matt Gunterman May 29th, 2007

The Creation Museum opened in Kentucky this holiday weekend. I’ve included some excerpts from the Courier-Journal piece on it below.

Earlier this year, I was having coffee with Edward J. Larson, whose book on the Scopes trial — Summer for the Gods – won the Pulitzer Prize for history in 1997, and he and I got into a discussion on the historical and psychological phenomenon of some Americans selectively denying science.

Larson has written on the topic before, and it’s at the center of my own historical research. As Larson has pointed out, American Creationists can deny evolutionary science — demonize it, in fact — and suffer absolutely no consequences in their daily lives.

The same can’t get said for sciences like germ theory, for instance, the history of which is my professional concern. You’ll find all kinds of people who don’t believe in evolution, but they certainly believe that germs cause disease — not “unclean spirits” or sin as the scriptures might imply — and they go out of their way to avoid those germs.

A century ago, large segments of Protestants in the United States denied that germs caused disease. American society outgrew that churlishness for quite practical and rational reasons.

So, if these people are going to deny science, they’ve decided to deny a science that there’s no consequence in denying. In essence, Creationists are huge cowards.

It’s time that the rational elements of this nation stand up to these sorts of people and call them what they really are: crazy or disingenuous (or a combination of both). It’s fine that people believe and practice whatever they like in their homes and houses of worship, but it’s time we no longer let one person’s superstition have political and institutional influence over the lives of other Americans.

Two good examples of this sort of superstition impacting the lives of others: stem-cell research and same-sex marriage.

Creation Museum opens
Thousands pay visit, including protesters

By Chris Kenning

PETERSBURG, Ky. — Amid protesters and television cameras, several thousand visitors lined up yesterday for the opening of the Creation Museum, a $27 million attraction purporting that the Bible’s creation story is literal fact supported by science.

[...]

Through a mix of exhibits and displays, they were told that the Grand Canyon was created in the biblical flood; that Noah’s animals repopulated continents by floating across oceans on uprooted trees; that the earth is 6,000 years old, not billions; and that poison dart frogs were harmless before Adam’s sin.

Some visitors said the 60,000-square-foot museum — a cross between a natural history museum and a biblical theme park — reinforced their views that evolution and the Big Bang — the theory that the universe was created in a giant explosion — are wrong, despite scientific consensus to the contrary.

“If you want to believe you came from animals, that’s you,” said Paul Aduba, who came from Toledo, Ohio. “But it’s a lie.”

[...]

“We use the same science … we just interpret it differently,” said creator Ken Ham, who started the ministry in his native Australia and has raised money for years to build the museum.

Ham said he sees the museum as a new weapon in a wider “culture war” for Christians who “feel like they’ve been beat down” in battles over abortion, gay marriage and the display of the Ten Commandments in public places. He also hopes it will change the views of non-believing visitors.

[...]

Inside, a 200-seat special-effects theater simulates wind and rain and features two angelic characters who declare, “God loves science!” At a great flood exhibit, animatronic men work on a wooden reproduction of Noah’s ark, which the museum contends also held dinosaurs and could carry 125,280 “sheep-sized animals.”

Fossils, the museum contends, were formed in the aftermath of God’s retribution in the flood thanks in part to “unique chemical conditions.”

“There’s two different theories,” Sean Riccardelli of Pennsylvania told his daughters, Elina, 7, and Liza, 9, as they read biblical passages from one exhibit. “You believe what’s in your heart … what your faith tells you.”

[...]

Next »