Archive for the 'Racism' Category

PSA: Phony Pheminists

Terri Whitehouse September 15th, 2008

Aww, how precious. Conservatives have gone and discovered pheminism. A whole week-ish after I called it like I saw it, B. Hussein Osama’s uppity ass went and said that the same old bullshit by any other name still stinks.

It doesn’t just stink. It STANKS!

At any rate, it’s really sweet to see the GOP hustle at developing their pheminist muscles. (No, I’m not talking about kegels.) To the conservatives out there who are new to pheminism, I’d like to offer a very brief rundown of the concept. I understand that you’ve dedicated your whole lives to harming women’s physical, psychological, and financial well-being, so there are bound to be early failures. Pheminism, like any asset worth having, doesn’t develop over night. You’ve got to practice!

First off, rushing to the defense of your VP, as though she were a Damsel in Distress and not a damn pit bull-skinned moose hunter is problematic. Read and learn. No, rape is nowhere near as bad as some boy being a big meanie, but I think the same concept applies.

Secondly, please understand the difference between “feminism” and “pheminism.” Feminists are a bunch of fugly, hairy, man-hating sluts that care about shit like getting paid, and not dying as a result of pregnancy. Real trivial crap.

Pheminists, on the other hand, are beautiful, non-threatening white women (mostly) who collect wingnut welfare and have made hefty money putting bitches in their place. Intellectually, feminists win hands down, but who wants to hang with a bunch of humorless brainiacs? Pheminists are women, so you don’t have to hide or feel all guilty about your deep-seeded innate hatred of them.

Finally, it’s 2008, not 1968. Therefore, it’s probably not the brightest idea to call out supposed sexist attacks by reverting back to racist dogwhistles. While it’s admirable that you’re coming to pheminism in the 9th inning, better not to do it on the back of racism. That’s not how feminism works.

This is.

(x-posted: B&P)

Ed Whitfield And His Code Words!

Jim Pence August 5th, 2008

I have friends, acquaintances and family that are gay and I know a gay code word when I hear one, most of the time. I also have black friends and acquaintances and I know the subtle code words for racism and I suggest the video below will show Ed. Whitfield spewing these code words out of his homophobic racist mouth.
Mr. Whitfield as a congressman is supposed to represent the all folks in his district, not divide them. It’s a shame he’s wrote off some of those he’s supposed to be representing as unworthy!!!

Oh The Sun Shines Bright On My Old Kentucky Racist!

Jim Pence May 21st, 2008

Kentucky exit polls indicate that 21% of KY voters said race was important. My question is this, how many folks were asked that question, but didn’t respond honestly?
I suggest the racist voted yesterday and they have been exposed and it can no longer be said, with any honesty, that race doesn’t matter here in Kentucky.

CNN exit polls indicate that 21% of KY voters said the race of the candidate was important. Of them, 81% voted for Hillary Clinton, while 16% cast a ballot for Barack Obama.
Meanwhile, 18% of those who said race was important to them were white, and almost nine of 10 voted for Clinton.
For all the talk of the impact of gender bias in the Democratic contest and, most notably, in media coverage of the battle, the race of the IL senator persists as a variable for many rural, white voters

Quick Hit: It’s Their Nature

Terri Whitehouse April 15th, 2008

There’s an excellent post by Pam Spaulding about a racist comment that Rep. Geoff Davis made at an event in which Sen. Mitch McConnell also gave the world the opportunity to see just how low class the Kentucky GOP can be. I can’t remember where I read it, but my favorite defense of Davis’s racist remark so far is that he was hopefully just drunk. Desperate measures, indeed.

The Only Thing We Have to Fear…

Terri Whitehouse March 19th, 2008

Nope. It’s not the ’stache. Why, it’s the illegals, of course!

Rep. Tom Burch, D-Louisville, narrowly lost a bid on the House floor to spread statewide a program to give official identification cards to homeless people.

Burch said many homeless people are veterans who need an official ID to collect benefits. He said a similar program has worked well in Jefferson County and would require three people who work at a homeless shelter to verify identity.

But the debate on House Bill 308 stirred up House Republicans. Rep. Stan Lee, R-Lexington, said the IDs could end up in the hands of illegal immigrants.

There are no words. None.

If you’re feeling particularly masochistic, check out this little piece about what happens when we start nouning adjectives. And this one.

The sanctity of all human life, my shiny hiney. In the eyes of Republicans, the only thing more subhuman than a homeless person is an immigrant. Despicable.

Quick Hit: Recommended Reading

Terri Whitehouse March 10th, 2008

Law Student Jill Filipovic has two excellent posts up on Feministe this week, which follow up on that 1 in 99 statistic that was recently reported.

In “America Behind Bars”, Filipovic discusses the economic and social impact of the incarceration rate:

And entire communities depend on prisons for their economic stability. They have disproportionate political power — prison inmates count as residents, meaning that the areas are allocated greater resources that the inmates don’t benefit from and they’re counted in the population of Congressional districts. And inmates, of course, can’t vote — and in many states, they can’t vote once they get out, either.

Piggybacking on that post in “Judicial nominees, prison exploitation and discriminatory country clubs”, Filipovic takes a closer look at the prison-industrial complex and those who profit from it:

…like the private military contractors that the Bush administration pays to do our dirty work in Iraq, private prison employees were long not subject to the same laws that federal and state prison employees are…

All Of Us & Open Thread

Terri Whitehouse January 21st, 2008

Some of us weren’t given the day off. Some of us work two jobs, even. So some of us just have time to post a teensy little roundup of worthy reads on the day all of us celebrate the life and contributions of Martin Luther King, Jr. (And some of us will likely have to do the same tomorrow.)

Scott Lemieux excerpts Letter from a Birmingham Jail, the first thing I ever read by Dr. King when I was a youngster.

Pam Spaulding profiles Dr. King’s views on the Vietnam War.

Shark-Fu talks about the dream vs. reality.

Adam Howard examines the radicalism of Dr. King.

MediaCzech calls out the mouthbreathers.

Leonard Pierce makes me snort when I laugh.

Any other good links for the day? ‘Preciate it!

These, my friends, are truly frightening paragraphs

Matt Gunterman November 25th, 2007

Yes. Frightening paragraphs. I was reading this oped by a lawyer in Lexington named W. Bryan Hubbard in this Sunday’s Herald-Leader with bemusement until I came to these words. Then the whole thing just turned dark and scary:

GOP must reclaim conservative high ground

[...]

In mockery’s face, we must continue to preach that America is special because it is divine. The God who created it is the same God who grants our liberty against the tyrant within. To protect a nation of faith, we must be a party of faith that welcomes all who worship and respect that which is greater than man.

We must preserve a nation of color. One hundred years from now, we will look and sound much different than we do today. Fear not, for America is not a language or color. It is the sum of history’s eternal dream — a land where freedom reigns and peace prevails.

We are called to keep that flame for those who risk life and limb to live in its light. If the choice must ever be made, may we be brown, speak Spanish and be free before we stay white, speak English and be socialist.

Freedom calls. The time has come to rise and march.

###

First, as far as the conservative high ground is concerned, they can have all the conservative ground they want. The rest of us — the vast majority of us — are going a different direction. It’s called progressive, and we’re looking for progress, not preserving the status quo.

Second, it really is the sign of a highly delusional mind to make a statement to tens of thousands of readers that the United States is divine. Let’s be frank; that’s a statement that all but the very fringe of religious Americans would eschew. That’s crazy talk.

Third, I love the not-so-latent racism. To paraphrase, ‘It’s better to be brown than socialist, but in the perfect world we’d remain white and capitalist.’ And do you know what will make us socialist in his eyes? Universal health care! Yes, that’s right, for conservatives, to provide every man woman and child in the country access to health care is socialism! Just like it’s socialist to provide every man woman and child access to state-sponsored education. Oops.

People. This man represents the state of the conservative movement in Kentucky.

Progressives rejoice!

Rep. Stan Lee (R) is Kentucky’s version of Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?)

Matt Gunterman October 31st, 2007

God bless Joe Sonka. God bless Joe Sonka because he works his tail off traversing Kentucky covering the various manifestations of right-wing lunacy in the commonwealth [If you haven't checked out Joe's blogosphere-famous coverage of the Creation Museum from earlier this year, do so].

I envy Joe because he has that ability to observe the multitude of nitwits that make up the Kentucky GOP with a humorous eye and a sly smirk. I, on the other hand, don’t suffer these fools so well, even from a thousand miles away. Yet Joe has the gift, through his writing, of putting the crazy nature of social conservatives in Kentucky in perspective.

For example, Joe has a frightening new report over at BlueGrassRoots (the article itself will be published in the Lexington-based W Weekly) about a recent meeting of the American Family Association of Kentucky.

I’m going to include some excerpts from Joe’s piece below, but the most important thing to remember is that both the Republican candidate for state attorney general, Rep. Stan Lee, and for state auditor, Linda Greenwell, were in attendance and fully engaged at this meeting.

You know how most of the world has been up-in-arms against Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (R?) over his years-long effort to promote the cause of holocaust denial? It’s craziness. Rational people know it. That didn’t stop the Iranians from organizing and hosting a Holocaust denial conference last year. Birds of a feather flock together, as even the U.S.’s very own former Klu Klux Klan member David Duke took part.

In the end, we will never eliminate crazy beliefs like Holocaust denial, racism, xenophobia, or homophobia, but we can marginalize them. Peer pressure does work, especially here in the United States. Americans, by and large, want to be perceived as successful, accepted, and mainstream. So, by framing these sorts of beliefs as radical, extreme, undesirable and out-of-the-mainstream, you necessitate that people who continue to cling to them make an overt choice for themselves: which is more important to them, their hatred of others or their own prosperity?

It’s objectively true that hatred is not rational; it is morally wrong. Yet some people will not make the rational choice on their own; they need a little cajoling along the way. That’s where societal pressure comes into play.

Keep that in mind as you read what Joe has to say below about this meeting. Think about how outrageous its content was, and how scary it is that two of the Republican candidates for statewide office embraced this message and those who propagate it.

In short, these people at the American Family Association of Kentucky are free to have their beliefs; it’s a free country. The rest of us, however, should expect that men and women who strive to attain the highest levels of elected office in our land would not associate with them, would shun them. Instead, they are embracing them, and on election day the people of Kentucky will shun Stan Lee and Linda Greenwell as punishment.

Raging Bigotry and the Dying of the Right

Did you know that Lexington is run by the “Homosexual Hegemony”? That “the gays” own the government and the media? And the only way to get access to this power is to have the dirty gay sex with them?

Yea, neither did I.

[...]

Roughly 50 people squeezed into the cafeteria. After the first speaker told us how he escaped the evils of today’s society when God told him to start his own line of athletic apparel, it was Kent Ostrander’s turn. Ostrander, the founder of the like-minded Family Foundation, was a key player in the push to amend KY’s Constitution so that gay marriage and civil unions are now outlawed.

He was sure to preface his points with “now, I’m not trying to vilify homosexuals”. For example, he would say this just before his inaccurate tangent on how gay sex is the cause of 75% of AIDS in the world. “These people bring this on themselves!”

He further chastised UK, saying that allowing partners to receive health insurance is to tolerate and “validify” these relationships. Again, he “wasn’t trying to vilify gays”, but the “predatory ideas of the radical homosexual agenda” will destroy our families and society. Ostrander ended his speech, nearly shouting, “Our God shall reign!”

Next, a sociology student presented her research project on why the black community in Lexington is faced with the problems of poverty, crime and drug abuse. Her conclusion, after repeatedly informing us that she was a “scientist”? Young blacks in Lexington are mired in this because of….. The Gays. You see, homosexuals own all of the power in the black community of Lexington, coining it the “Homosexual Hegemony”. Those gays force young blacks wanting access to that power to tolerate and become acclimated to the gay lifestyle. One acclimated to this immorality, they succumb to the evils of drug abuse, crime and dirty gay sex.

But these are just the crazy ramblings of some small fringe cult, right? Apparently, not. Linda Greenwell, Republican candidate for Auditor in next week’s election, was happily handing out campaign literature to the crowd. Ostrander pointed out state Sen. Stan Lee in the crowd, thanking him for all of his work to “support our cause in Frankfort”. Lee, the Republican candidate for Attorney General, took a bow and soaked in the applause.

Then, it was Frank Simon’s turn. He jumped right into the “culture war” routine, blasting the godless villains who have taken the commandments, literal creation science and prayer out of public schools. “We need to stop them and GOD will stop them!”

Simon started in with the gays, then paused, putting on a coy exterior of doubt. “Oh, I don’t want to get into this…” before deciding to share his shocking video with the crowd. The lights were dimmed, and he presented a video that he claimed was being shown in schools. It showed a series of families, in which a child introduced us to his/her two mothers or fathers. Each child explained how, despite their differences, they love and protect each other just like any other family does.

The visceral reaction from the crowd was palpable. Audible gasps. Loud cries of “no!!!”, “my God!!”, “how dare they!” It resembled the “2-minute hate” out of Orwell’s 1984, the crowd whipped up into frenzy at the traitorous Goldstein. “This is what we’re up against!” cried Simon.

“Sure, kids drank beer back in my day, but it wasn’t until the gays that they started smoking the dope! ….. We never used to have to lock our doors!”

They culprit was the ubiquitous “They”. “They” took over our government. “They” want gay sex taught to our children. “They control the media! You’re only going to find out about these votes in Frankfort after they happen. That’s no accident. They don’t want you to know about them!”

Such bigotry among fundamentalists has many forbearers. This used to be the argument against “race-mixing”, how the Bible warned against it and it would tear down the fabric of our society. Such bigots were swept to the margins of society after the civil rights movement, but there is always a new “they” to latch onto. And while fomenting hatred towards gays has proved quite successful for the Christian Right, they also know that the gig is up.

Shortly after this AFA meeting, UK had a “coming out week”, where gay and straight students could show solidarity and promote tolerance. At one event, state Sen. Ernesto Scorsone, our first openly gay representative, told the crowd, “When I went to UK, something like this was unheard of. We’ve progressed to the point where this is now possible.”

And that is why we see the vitriol of the Christian right. They know that their loss in the culture war is imminent. A recent poll showed that those under 30 have rejected this brand of bigotry in politics, supporting gay rights in overwhelming numbers. There is even a rift among evangelicals, as a recent NYT article found many churches abandoning the obsession with gays, moving towards the social justice aspect of Christianity.

Tuesday’s election would seem to validate this trend, as Republicans Ernie Fletcher and Stan Lee are expected to lose by nearly 20 points. But victory is not yet upon us, as KY politicians will still seek to capitalize on this homophobic demographic (Even Todd Hollenbach, Dem. candidate for Treasurer, refuses to renounce Simon’s endorsement).

But at least we now know that it will take more than simply using homophobia to get elected in KY.

Of course, if I was Mexican, I’d be sweating a bit.

A Victory For Reverse-Racismists!

Terri Whitehouse June 28th, 2007

Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog reports that the Supreme Court has struck down race-based public school integration programs in Louisville and Seattle:

“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” Roberts wrote. On the two school plans, the majority found that the districts have “failed to provide the necessary support for the proposition that there is no other way than individual racial classifications to avoid racial isolation in their school districts.”

This is great news because Louisville children are no longer adversely affected by Jim Crow practices that ended decades ago.

Snarkiness aside, I don’t have a dog in the fight, really. I didn’t grow up in Louisville and don’t have kids. Living in the country, long bus rides to and from school were a way of life.

Part of being a big-mouthed know-it-all is asking questions. What will be done to ensure that de facto segregation doesn’t happen again? Whatsmore, what, if anything, will be done to ensure that all public schools and communities are provided with the resources they need to help students achieve academic success? Where does our dialogue about poverty, housing, education, and race go from here? Does this court decision effectively shove cotton in the ears of those who continue to say that the playing field was leveled long ago?

The Courier-Journal offers local coverage of the SCOTUS decision, and if article comments are any indication, I’d say the answer to that last question is, “yes.” Daily Kos and Think Progress offer opinion on the court decision. I think that both sides of the busing debate make compelling arguments, but in the end, I can’t help that this decision makes me extremely uneasy. Makes you wonder who those “activist judges” really are.

Addendum: Check out the C-J’s editorial response to the Supreme Court ruling.

Runnin’ on Fumes: McConnell Quick Hits

Terri Whitehouse May 24th, 2007

Well, fumes, Red Bull, and Diet Coke, and Citrus Drop, that is. A lot have things have flown under my radar as I am entering my very last week of school before graduation. My sincere apologies.

Senator Mitch McConnell has introduced an amendment requiring a government-issued photo I.D. be shown in order to vote in any federal election. Of course, this proposed amendment makes no such provision for absentee ballots, which is how most voter fraud is committed, if I’m not mistaken. Read the long-winded press release from Sen. McConnell if you’re up to it. Does anyone else wonder if this is his passive-aggressive way to vote down the immigration bill without having to vote it down?

Sen. McConnell also introduced a bill called the the “Stop Over-Spending Act.” I like it. Simple. Forceful. Imperative. Just rolls off the tongue, doesn’t it? Our senator then goes on to talk about Dems’ willful disregard for the economy and what have you. The press release is available here.

President George W. Bush nominated U.S. Attorney Amul Thapar for a post as Federal Judge U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky.

Discuss at will and please comment if I’ve missed anything else, as I’m sure I have. I’ve been looking at glaring screen and printed material for 14 hours or so, time to uncross my eyes.

Fox New Radio’s John Gibson echoes Mitch McConnell’s racism

Matt Gunterman April 25th, 2007

Media Matters highlights this outlandish bit of on-air racism from Fox News Radio’s John Gibson. Sadly, Senator Mitch McConnell has been using a similarly racist line of argument about Iraqis for months now. McConnell has to fire up his base, and that base is made up of every sort of racist and bigot this nation has to offer; it eats this stuff up.

Fox’s Gibson: U.S. invasion “unmasked” Iraqis as “knuckle-dragging savages from the 10th century”

On the April 23 broadcast of his Fox News Radio show, John Gibson argued that the Iraqi people — whom he described as “knuckle-dragging savages from the 10th century” — are at “fault” for the situation in Iraq.

While discussing Iraq, Gibson said: “The one thing that drives me up the wall is [people] saying, ‘Look at all the deaths you Americans have caused in Iraq.’ No! ‘Scuse me? We invaded the place, we knocked over Saddam, and then Iraqis began killing each other.”

Later in the show, Gibson agreed with a caller that the Coalition Provisional Authority’s 2003 decision to purge the civil service of all former members of Saddam Hussein’s Baath Party and disband the Iraqi army “was a mistake.”

Gibson then stated: “[B]ut who is doing this killing? Give me a break. These are Iraqis killing each other. So what did we do? If you’re saying it’s our fault that we unmasked them as knuckle-dragging savages from the 10th century — fine! I’ll take credit.”

[...]

Senator Mitch McConnell is beholden to racists

Matt Gunterman April 21st, 2007

Here’s an easy question to answer: Is Senator Mitch McConnell a fat-cat pharmaceutical boss?

No, he’s not. He’s minority leader of the U.S. Senate. But just because McConnell’s not a fat-cat pharmaceutical boss doesn’t mean that he’s not beholden to them. He does their bidding. He is their tool, an instrument of their profiteering and exploitation of this nation’s sick, elderly, and vulnerable.

Is Senator McConnell a racist? Is he a homophobe? Is he a sexist? Is he a bigot? Is he a xenophobe?

Whatever your own answers to these questions, you’ll have to admit that, as he is to the fat cats, Mitch McConnell is beholden to this nation’s racists, homophobes, sexists, bigots, and xenophobes. They are his base of political support, and as such, when McConnell speaks, he speaks first and foremost to those groups.

Remember, for instance, when things started going from bad to worse with the war in Iraq earlier this year. Sen. McConnell came out and said that if the President’s latest surge didn’t work in the end, it wasn’t the fault of President George W. Bush or McConnell himself. Instead, according to McConnell, if it all fell apart, it was because the Iraqis lacked “the capability to govern themselves there in the capital city.” Notice that McConnell didn’t say that the Iraqis weren’t ready for self-government. He said they weren’t capable of it; they lacked the inate ability. Sen. McConnell made it clear that he believes that Iraqis are simply inferior human beings.

McConnell was speaking to his base. They like to hear this stuff. It rings true to them and every hateful, spiteful, and ignorant thing they hold dear.

Now we have a new chapter in Sen. Mitch McConnell’s racist appeals: his effort to deny the 350,000 African Americans and 41,000 Hispanics in Washington, DC — along with everyone else — full-fledged representation in Congress.

As many, many bloggers have pointed out, the Bush administration — with Karl Rove leading the charge — has done everything it possibly can in the last seven years to disenfranchise ethnic minority voters through allegations of “voter fraud” that doesn’t exist.

Mitch McConnell is joining the White House’s program now, too, by obstructing the effort in Congress to give the District of Columbia a voting seat in the House of Representatives. This seat would almost assuredly go to a Democrat, but the legislation would also create an extra seat for Utah, which would almost assuredly go to a Republican. If the measure were to somehow get around Mitch McConnell in the Senate, President Bush has promised to veto the measure if it reaches his desk.

McConnell claims the legislation is unconstitutional, but most scholars disagree with Sen. McConnell’s amateur assessment. Yet, because McConnell is by his very nature a coward, he doesn’t realize that what’s right and what’s constitutional aren’t always one and the same. There’s no need in pointing out the rather obvious examples from history.

The right thing to do is to give the citizens of Washington, DC a legitimate seat in the House.

But Sen. McConnell won’t ever support that.

His base of supporters would go crazier and start foaming at the mouth even more if McConnell allowed the political empowerment of nearly 400,000 non-whites.