Archive for the 'Pork Spending' Category

Sugar Coma

Terri Whitehouse June 17th, 2008

Page One and some other self-aggrandizing bloggers have noted Sen. Mitch McConnell’s shaky poll numbers, and I wanted to expound on that a little.

Career beltway-ist McConnell has done his best to paint incumbent candidate Bruce Lunsford as an incompetent status-seeking businessman. Funny, then, that Lunsford is leading among low-to-middle-income Kentuckians without college educations. Now, I hold nothing against people who make more than I do, and I certainly wouldn’t go hurling “college-educated” around as an insult, but given that Kentucky ranks near the bottom in terms of education and income, McConnell is going to have a heck of a time positioning himself as someone who is really in touch with the “average” Kentucky voter.

Being that McConnell’s campaign site has been redesigned to showcase his ability to roll up the sleeves on his tastefully casual shirt rather than sit around pushing papers in a suit and tie, I’d guess that he’s more than a little worried. Over half of Mitch’s twenty most-recent blog posts urge readers to sign a petition for a bill designed to do exactly nothing about our petroleum dependence, so I’d urge you to try something different instead. Why, it seems like it was only yesterday when McConnell thought it’d be enough that he brought home the pork-barrel projects. I guess he’s getting wise that Kentuckians need someone with a little more substance than that.

Big Money Mitch Gets A Great Big F!

Terri Whitehouse March 13th, 2008

Sen. Mitch McConnell, 2008:

I doubt that couples with children who make $63,000 a year think that they’re rich.

Why, it seems like only yesterday that Sen. Mitch McConnell and his BFF, Pres. George W. Bush were arguing that such families were rich!

Of course, we all know that when it comes to giving a flying you-know-what about the middle class, Sen. Mitch McConnell gets a big fat F. For all the huffing and puffing he does, for all the scraps he tosses our way every once in a while, ultimately, Sen. Mitch McConnell has failed this state.

Does anyone really believe we are better off with this man as our senator? I don’t know about ya’ll, but this gal has had just about enough. DITCH MITCH!

The Least Shocking News Ever: Mitch McConnell set to screw John McCain and fiscal responsibility

Joe Sonka March 7th, 2008

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

I predicted on Monday that Mitch McConnell was about to screw over John McCain and his party's future by nixing the proposed freeze on earmarks.

Today, The Hill says I'm right.

A Senate Republican task force on earmarks is expected to stop short of temporarily freezing funding for pet projects, breaking with the party’s presidential nominee and House GOP leaders who are trying to make it a wedge issue in the election, according to people involved in the effort.

The five-member task force, convened in January by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.), meets Friday to move toward a consensus position. The issue has continued to dog congressional Republicans who are under enormous pressure from their base to rein in earmarking. Final recommendations are due by March 15.

**********

Making a strong consensus even more daunting, McConnell has asked the group to report out only those recommendations upon which members unanimously agree. But the task force’s members run the gamut from Sen. Tom Coburn (Okla.), who sought no earmarks last year, to Sen. Thad Cochran (Miss.), who secured more than $830 million worth of earmarks in 2007, the most in Congress.

The Club for Growth and Wall St. Journal pile on:

Newly minted presidential nominee John McCain stepped into the Rose Garden this week to receive President Bush's blessing. What the cameras didn't catch were pork-addicted congressional Republicans blowing raspberries from their offices.

With all the talk about how Mr. McCain needs to unify his party, lost has been the question of whether some people will let him. Washington Republicans know he's their best shot at retaining the White House. Yet many remain ambivalent about him — not because they question his conservatism, but out of resentment that he may get in the way of their earmarks.

This has resulted in a behind-the-scenes brawl, as spend-happy Republicans resist efforts by wiser heads to fall in behind Mr. McCain's anti-earmark message. At best, the spenders risk an embarrassing pummeling by their own nominee that could hurt them in their own re-election campaigns. At worst, they could undercut one of Mr. McCain's more persuasive messages.

*********

Driving this is the old philosophy that bacon is necessary to win elections. Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is already running re-election ads in Kentucky boasting about the $200 million he secured for universities, as well as a hefty buyout he secured for his state's tobacco farmers.

I'll just reiterate what I said Monday:

So Mitch McConnell has a choice: (1) continue his campaign strategy of bragging about how how pork and government waste he can bring to KY in order to secure support for himself, or (2) go with "conservative" principles and end earmarks for the sake of John McCain and the Republican Party.

But when it comes to Mitch McConnell, one thing should be certain: the only thing he cares about is himself and his own power. McConnell does not have any principle and will do whatever is necessary for himself. So, as the GOP aide said in the story, Mitch indeed will have to "decide if (his) pork is more important than (his) party’s future."

Don't hold your breath folks, I can tell you how this story ends.

Well, I can tell you that it smells like bacon.

And dead, rotting elephants. 

The Early Bird Gets the Turd

Terri Whitehouse February 7th, 2008

Sometimes, I wonder why I don’t just stick cotton in my ears every morning:

The Army blocked help for wounded vets and then lied about it.

Sen. Mitch McConnell and his ilk stopped legislation that would actually help people in this dear-God-whatever-you-do-don’t-call-it-a-recession.

We’re paying more and getting less for our national defense.

Ooooooh! Buuuuurrrrn!

Terri Whitehouse February 2nd, 2008

There is an excellent editorial in today’s Courier-Journal about Sen. Mitch McConnell titled, appropriately enough, “The Back Of His Hand“:

Millions of Americans are in economic trouble, while the Big Energy friends of George W. Bush and Mitch McConnell wallow in historic profits. Yesterday, Exxon Mobil Corp. posted the largest annual gain ever by a U.S. company — $40.6 billion. The rest of us are left to cower at the gasoline pumps.

Mitch McConnell feels he deserves re-election because he “does so much for Kentucky.” Never mind what he and his friend have done to America.

For real, though! Go read the whole shebang.

A Word About McConnell’s Poll Numbers

Terri Whitehouse January 12th, 2008

A recent poll conducted by Voter/Consumer Research is being trotted out as proof that Sen. Mitch McConnell is invincible in 2008’s general election. I think some people are believing that “defeatocrat” nonsense way too much, that somehow a supposed 61% approval will doom any bids to defeat McConnell this fall. Well, as a few commenters at Bluegrass Report point out, this poll was commissioned by McConnell himself, and one has to wonder about the methodology.

While I’m sure that the general public is a bit gun-shy about pollsters, particularly after being so far off base in New Hampshire, the new SUSA poll shows McConnell’s approval at under 50%, which is more in-line with recent trends in his approval rating. We don’t doubt that beating a career incumbent politician with a lot of name recognition and a history of pork barrel spending will be a difficult task. But as the death toll in Iraq continues to rise with no end in sight, and as Kentuckians tighten their purse strings in preparation for a recession, Sen. McConnell has made it clear over and over again that he is completely out-of-touch with the majority of Kentuckians. We’re up to the fight. Is he?

John McCain: Mitch’s nightmare

Joe Sonka January 8th, 2008

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

With John McCain surging in the polls, Mitch McConnell has to be sweating bullets. McCain and McConnell have butted heads repeatedly over the years, specifically on campaign finance and pork barrel spending.

McCain comes from the rational school of thought that big money interests shouldn't be able to buy and sell politicians, and we shouldn't sneak earmarks into legislation that run up our deficit. McConnell, however, believes that corporate interests' ability to bribe politicians and ensure their election is "free speech". A LOT of fat cats have "spoken" to Mitch over the years, of course. Mitch also believes that earmarks and pork barrel spending, which bankrupt our government and burdens the next generation of Americans, is a great way to buy votes and "reward" his campaign contributors.

Needless to say, McCain wouldn't be the most enthusiastic partner on the Republican ticket in Kentucky. Especially when running against a fiscally resonsible, ethical, 27-year Marine vet with a distinguished military record.

And look at this quote that the Romney campaign pulled out of the archives lately, in it's Top 10 list of McCain "attacking" fellow Republicans:

6. Sen. McCain Accused Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) Of The "Most Egregious Incident" Of Corruption He Had Seen In The Senate. "It escalated when McCain reiterated the charges Oct. 10 in a cross-examination, calling McConnell's actions the 'most egregious incident' demonstrating the appearance of corruption he has ever seen in his Senate career." (Amy Keller, "Attacks Escalate In Depositions," Roll Call, 10/21/02) 

I'm not sure how you call that an "attack" when he's simply stating the obvious, but thanks for the quote anyway, Mitt.

Hal Rogers Brings Home the Bacon

Terri Whitehouse December 18th, 2007

The good folk at the Sunlight Foundation have highlighted earmarks by Rep. Harold Rogers:

After it hired a lobbyist and its employees’ contributed to a member of Congress’ leadership political action committee, a Kentucky company saw its defense business quadruple thanks to earmarks.

Over the last three years, Rep. Harold Rogers, R-Ky., says he has earmarked at least $10.4 million in defense funds for Phoenix Products, Inc., a small company in McKee, Ky., that makes aircraft accessories, including custom V.I.P. interiors for Black Hawk helicopters that “offer the finest leather,” fabric, naugahyde and carpet, according to the firm’s Web site.

In 2006, Phoenix added Kentucky-based McCarthy & Speaks Strategic Solution, a lobbying firm that has strong connections with Rogers, to its Capitol Hill representation. Partner Jeff Speaks worked in Rogers’ congressional office as projects director for 10 years, according to the firm’s Web site; Speaks represented Phoenix Products, the firm’s lobbying disclosure forms show. The other partner, John T. McCarthy III, was the chairman of the Kentucky state Republican Party.

Since 2004, Martin, Fisher, Thompson and Associates and McCarthy & Speaks Strategic Solution Phoenix Products have reported that Phoenix Products has paid them more than $240,000 to lobby on its behalf.

During that same time period, the firm’s employees have given $12,400 to Rogers’s campaign and have been contributors to his leadership PAC as well. In 2007, Peggy Wilson and Thomas Wilson each made $1,500 donations to Rogers’s leadership PAC, Help America’s Leaders (HALPAC); their first campaign donations to HALPAC came in 2004, Federal Election Commission records show. They’ve also contributed to other members of the Kentucky delegation including Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Sen. Jim Bunning (R-Ky.).

Must be nice in that ivory tower!

Club for Growth Slams McConnell (Calling Sen. Forgy!)

Joe Sonka December 12th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Predictably, the Club for Growth slams McConnell for his big-government pork giveaway plan:

Club for Growth Criticizes McConnell Plan on Omnibus
Washington - In response to Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s press conference this afternoon on the Omnibus bill, Club for Growth President Pat Toomey issued the following statement:

“It is a shame to see the highest ranking Republicans in the Senate move to the left of the Democrats on earmarks. For weeks, House Republicans stood strong against wasteful spending, resulting in a victory when Democratic Representative David Obey proposed eliminating all earmarks from the Omnibus Appropriations bill in order to reduce the bill’s price tag to meet the President’s request. We think this is a fantastic idea and applaud Obey for recognizing that earmarks are the least worthy component of the Omnibus bill.”

“Unfortunately, Senator McConnell and Trent Lott are perpetuating the practice of wasteful pork-barrel spending. Rather than part with his own and his colleagues’ pet projects, Senator McConnell announced his intention to offer an amendment that will reduce spending in the Omnibus bill by about two percent across the board, including earmarks. Trent Lott jumped to Senator McConnell’s defense, arguing that ‘Earmarks are justified and legitimate . . . I wouldn't give up my earmarks.’ We disagree. The earmarking process is inherently abusive. The earmarks are not subjected to committee hearings, competitive bidding, or other normal vetting processes. This is why the earmarking practice must end. We have even recently seen earmarks famously abused as a currency of corruption. Senators McConnell and Lott’s support for pork projects in the Omnibus is a sad statement about the priorities of the Republican Leadership in the Senate.” 

True conservative Republicans: isn't it time to Draft Forgy?

Rahm slaps Mitch (and Bob Novak, too!)

Joe Sonka December 11th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Mitch McPorky, the villain of the Club for Growth and fiscally responsible conservatives, is out to load up the pork in his proposal to reach a budget deal that funds the Iraq war and earmarks for his sugar daddies filling the GOP warchest.

House Democratic Caucus Chairman Rahm Emanuel issued the following press release/smackdown of Sen. McPorky McFilibuster(I think he's been reading Ditch Mitch, but he forgot to add, "Calling Senator Forgy!")

"First Mitch McConnell sides with the White House and insists on a blank check for Iraq.  Now he's fighting for earmarks over funding for cancer cures, the veterans' health care crisis, and 50,000 new American teachers.  Under Senator McConnell's budget proposal, Iraq and his own re-election campaign would come first, while America's health care and education needs would come last.  When the American people called for change in 2006, it was not to maintain the status quo in Iraq and the status quo in Washington."

Thumpin'! 

UPDATE:

I totally missed this yesterday, but uber-conservative Bob "Prince of Darkness" Novak also slammed Mitch for his Pork Play.

That fork offers choices not only for current government spending but also for the Republican future. One way pressed by conservative reformers would either block an omnibus bill or stop it by sustaining a presidential veto, insisting on a continuing resolution that would save taxpayers $30 billion a year. The other course makes a deal with an omnibus bill $8 billion to $11 billion over Bush's guidelines, virtually forcing him to sign it by inserting troop money, further depressing the demoralized Republican voter base. That was the course McConnell clearly indicated last week.

Launching his 2008 campaign in Kentucky — he has warned this may be his most difficult reelection — McConnell in an ad stressed his performance as an appropriator delivering earmarks (highlighted by $280 million for his state's universities). His office regularly issues statements bragging about how much bacon he brings home to Kentucky in appropriations bills. But to actually put bacon on the table, McConnell needs something like the Democratic-drafted omnibus bill that contains 11,932 earmarks. A continuing resolution would add no new earmarks.

**************

These seasoned purveyors of pork outgun and outnumber GOP reformers such as Sen. Jim DeMint, a first-termer from South Carolina who told me: "A CR is the only way to keep spending at any sensible level. An omnibus bill would be a defeat for the Republicans. I don't see any reason to cave in on our principles. The Republicans have no discipline when it comes to appropriations." DeMint was careful not to mention McConnell and the other Republican appropriators by name, but there was no doubt whom he was talking about.

"The Republicans have no discipline when it comes to appropriations"

I like that quote, Sen. DeMint. Just go ahead and include Mitch's name next time, because we know who you were talking about.

CALLING SENATOR FORGY!!!!

This Week in James R. Carroll’s Notes from Washington

Matt Gunterman November 25th, 2007

James R. Carroll has some tidbits of interest in his “Notes from Washington” in the Courier-Journal this Sunday.

First up: Rep. Hal Rogers (R) is in deep denial, just like Sen. Mitch McConnell (R). As I pointed out here at DitchMitchKY back in August, at Fancy Farm this year McConnell was bashing Sen. Hillary Clinton (D) and using her presumed unpopularity in Kentucky to justify his belief that 2008 wouldn’t be bad for Republicans at all in the state is she were at the top of the Democratic ticket. As I pointed out then, the Survey USA presidential match-up polls for Kentucky showed Clinton defeating every potential Republican candidate at the time.

Well, it appears that Rep. Hal Rogers (R) is working under the same assumption about Clinton’s potential and popularity in Kentucky. From Carroll:

[...]

Political analysts see the GOP retirements as a sign that many Republicans believe their status as the minority party could be lengthy.

Rogers is not of that view.

More Republicans have retired in previous elections, he said.

“We feel good,” Rogers said of House Republicans. “We feel we’re doing some good things. We think next year may not be all that bad.”

A presidential election brings out voters who don’t otherwise vote in congressional races, and that can help the GOP, Rogers said.

The Democratic presidential nominee is likely to be Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., “and that will be good for us,” he said.

[...]

###

The times have changed in Kentucky. This isn’t 1994, when then First Lady Hillary Clinton was burned in effigy in Owensboro, Kentucky [with Rep. Ron Lewis (R) looking on in approval].

This is 2008 we’re talking about here, and it’s a whole other ballgame.

Second juicy piece from Carroll’s piece is this from the Club for Growth:

[...]

As you know, from time to time we offer ratings of lawmakers from groups across the ideological spectrum. This week we have ratings from the conservative Club for Growth.

The group has put out 2007 House and Senate “RePORK” cards. Lawmakers were rated on whether they supported what the Club for Growth viewed as anti-pork measures. The lower the lawmaker’s score, the more “porky” they are considered.

Only four senators scored what the group considered perfect 100 percent ratings. Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., was given an 87 percent, and McConnell got a 53 percent.

[...]

As Joe Sonka would say, “Calling Larry Forgy!”

UPDATE via Sonka: Matt’s words are backed up again by the SUSA poll #’s released yesterday. In head-to-head matchups Hillary Clinton beats ALL Republican challengers. Every damned one of them

Giuliani (R) 44 (45)
Clinton (D) 48 (47)

Romney (R) 39 (41)
Clinton (D) 54 (50)

Huckabee (R) 36 (39)
Clinton (D) 55 (49)

McCain (R) 47 (49)
Clinton (D) 48 (45)

Good luck with that anti-Hillary strategy, Rogers/McConnell.

Mitch the Grinch

Joe Sonka November 10th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Here’s my column in the current issue of Lexington’s W Weekly. I think it’s a nice welcome to the post-Ernie era for our pal Mitch. They say there’s no such thing as bad publicity, right?

When one is presented with the opportunity to provide healthcare to an additional 10 million children from low-income families, most people believe that our government should take advantage of it. In fact, almost 2/3 of both houses of Congress and 80% in opinion polls agree.

Others say, tough luck kiddo. Pull yourself up by your own bootie straps like a real American.

Senator Mitch McConnell would be one of those people.

Though outnumbered in both Congress and public opinion for the past 2 months, Mitch McConnell and George W. Bush have been able to derail the overwhelmingly popular and bipartisan legislation to expand healthcare for such children under the already successful SCHIP program. Despite many Republicans breaking ranks to support and pass the expansion of SCHIP, there were not enough votes to overturn Bush’s veto of the bill. Last week, McConnell again sided with the fringe minority in the Senate by voting against a new version of the bill, which he regards as “wasteful spending” and a stepping stone to “socialized medicine”.

But the Lexington Herald-Leader has recently discovered other avenues for our tax dollars that Mitch McConnell does not regard as “wasteful spending”.

One such avenue would be providing $25 million to a foreign military arms contractor called BAE. This was not $25 million that the Defense Department requested, mind you, but rather money that McConnell snuck into a defense appropriations bill as an earmark (pork, as they say).

And who is BAE? Well, they are a foreign company that is currently under investigation from several different countries, including our own Justice Department, for bribing public officials with hundreds of millions of dollars in order to secure contracts.

It should also be noted that BAE’s PACs and employees have given McConnell at least $53,000 in contributions since 2002. BAE’s subsidiary has also donated $500,000 to the new “McConnell Center” at the University of Louisville.

But I’m sure those two facts have nothing to do with one another.

So what other recipients of our tax dollars are not considered “wasteful spending”? How about clients of powerful Washington, D.C. lobbyist Hunter Bates? He was a top level staffer for McConnell from 1997-2003, and now heads his own lobbying firm, Bates Capital.

Bates represents “Voice for Humanity”, an organization formed to “spread the word of Christ throughout the world”. From 2003-2005, McConnell earmarked $8.3 million dollars to Voice for Humanity, so that they could send small mp3 players to people in Afghanistan. Recordings on these devices were supposed to teach the Afghanis how to have a democracy.

No, seriously.

McConnell has also earmarked $2.5 million to e-Cavern, $2.1 million to Boardpoint LLC and $17 million to Appriss Inc., all of whom paid large fees to hire Bates Capital.

During that time, Bates’ clients have given McConnell a total of over $120,000 in campaign contributions.

Again, maybe it’s just a coincidence.

Or maybe this is just the standard operating procedure for Mitch McConnell. Maybe those who play the game get rewarded, and those who don’t are left behind. You scratch my back, I’ll put $5 million in earmarks in your back pocket.

This kind of behavior, awarding constituents and donors back in your home district, is supposed to be avoided like kryptonite according to the mantra of “fiscal conservativism” within the Republican Party. Republicans like John McCain have long railed against these earmarks slipped into legislation, blaming it for building up massive debt in our federal budget. House Republican leader John Boehner also decries earmarks, saying of his supporters, “if they wanted someone who would raid the federal treasury on their behalf, they should vote for someone else”. Mitch McConnell apparently has no such qualms.

McConnell was a very strong critic of the McCain-Feingold Campaign Finance Bill passed a few years ago that set strict limits on the amount of soft money that individuals could contribute to campaigns. He argued that this was a violation of Americans’ “freedom of speech”. Indeed, money is speech to McConnell. And if you aren’t giving him money, he doesn’t hear you.

McConnell’s war chest for his re-election campaign next year is almost at $10 million, already. And this war chest is full of money from the health insurance industry. So when you see Mitch McConnell fighting so hard with the rest of the fringe minority to block the expansion of SCHIP, just know who is in his ear, whispering sweet nothings. Rest assured, it is not the children of low-income families who cannot afford health insurance.

Perhaps the only way for these kids to get through to Mitch McConnell is to repeal the child labor laws that we’ve had the past century. Hire them as big shot lobbyists, and let them wheel and deal with Mitch on the only level that he understands and respects.

Until then, poor kids who fall through the cracks and don’t have health insurance only have one option when they’re sick. Suck it up, walk it off, and keep pulling up on those bootie straps.

Mitch McConnell’s First Ad

Joe Sonka November 8th, 2007

(crossposted at BlueGrassRoots)

Here’s McConnell’s first ad, over $100,00 being spent on its airing soon in Lexington and Louisville.

You’ll note that Mitch McConnell is a VERY powerful man. He can get all kinds of stuff done in the Senate, apparently. But if that’s really the case, why is Kentucky almost rock bottom in education and healthcare? Is it possible that he uses this “power” not to help improve the lives of all Kentuckians, rather his big money donors?

And I can’t wait for the Club for Growth to see this ad!!!
This is a love letter to pork and federal government spending through earmarks. Calling Senator Forgy!!!


From C.Wash in the comments:

If Mitch McConnell is so damn powerful, why are we STILL sitting on so many tons of leaky chemical weapons over in this end of the state?

Why are 550,000 Kentuckians, including 81,000 children, without health insurance.

Why have the number of Kentuckians working gone up only 60,000 in four years?

Why has job growth in Kentucky been slower than the pace of other states?

At 6.1 percent, Kentucky’s unemployment rate is the nation’s fourth highest.

Doesn’t sound like he has much to brag about.

Doesn’t sound like much to brag about to me, too. Hunter Bates’ clients seem to be doing pretty well though, right?

McConnell quietly inserts money for British company under criminal investigation into bill; refuses to answer questions

Matt Gunterman October 27th, 2007

So, if you’ll recall, the response from Sen. Mitch McConnell’s office to questions about smears coming out of his office on 12 y.o. Graeme Frost — the sick boy whose only crime in the eyes of McConnell and Pres. George W. Bush was that he dared speak publicly of his gratitude to the American taxpayer for helping him and his family out in a time of need, rather than force them into bankruptcy — was to refuse to comment.

Well, guess what? McConnell has been caught inserting money for a British company under criminal investigation into a bill, and when reporters repeatedly contacted his office for comment, no comment was forthcoming.

I think we see a pattern developing. Here’s John Cheves writing in today’s Herald-Leader:

McConnell marks funds for contractor
FIRM UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR BRIBERY

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is pushing $25 million in earmarked federal funds for a British defense contractor that is under criminal investigation by the U.S. Justice Department and suspected by American diplomats of a “longstanding, widespread pattern of bribery allegations.”

McConnell tucked money for three weapons projects for BAE Systems into the defense appropriations bill, which the Senate approved Oct. 3. The Defense Department failed to include the money in its own budget request, which required McConnell to intercede, said BAE spokeswoman Susan Lenover.

BAE is based in Great Britain but has worldwide operations, including a Louisville facility that makes naval guns and employs 322. McConnell has taken at least $53,000 in campaign donations from BAE’s political action committees and employees since his 2002 re-election. United Defense Industries, which BAE purchased two years ago, pledged $500,000 to a political-science foundation the senator created, the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville.

In June, BAE confirmed that the Justice Department is investigating possible corruption in its Saudi Arabian deals. According to British media reports, BAE set up a slush fund with hundreds of millions of dollars in a Washington, D.C., bank to bribe Saudi Prince Bandar bin Sultan in order to win weapons contracts. Bandar, who heads the Saudi National Security Council, has denied the allegation.

BAE cannot discuss the allegation, Lenover said.

[...]

McConnell spokesman Don Stewart did not respond to repeated requests for comment.

Ethics watchdogs say they’re surprised McConnell, the Senate Republican leader, would continue to give earmarks and take donations from a corporation in hot water with his own government. McConnell should keep his distance, said Melanie Sloan, executive director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.

“Most politicians decide that a scandal is a good time to stop doing business with a company, at least until the scandal is over,” Sloan said. “Particularly when we’re talking about a criminal investigation over bribery. You would think that a member of Congress would want to steer clear of anyone accused of bribery.”

Even without the scandal, it looks bad for a senator to earmark federal money for a corporation, as compared to a public university or a local government in his state, said Ken Boehm, chairman of the National Legal and Policy Center in Washington.

“Why did they need special favors from Senator McConnell instead of going through the usual open competition and budgeting process at the Pentagon?” Boehm asked.

Nor should McConnell take donations from a company to which he steers federal funds, said Boehm, a former Republican congressional aide.

“Contributions from entities that directly benefit from earmarks are a bad idea,” he said. “There’s a big difference between a company that just likes your general ideas and a company that stands to benefit from one or more transactions that you’re making on their behalf using public money.”

McConnell’s earmarks include $12.2 million for five-inch Naval gun mount overhauls; $8 million for Naval destroyer weapons modernization; and $4.8 million for ammunition pallets for Naval ships.

The defense appropriations bill awaits action by a Senate-House conference committee that will iron out differences between bills from the two chambers before sending one bill to President Bush for his signature. Members of the conference have not been chosen, but McConnell sits on the Senate Appropriations subcommittee that controls defense spending.

Mitch McConnell says “Oink, Oink”

Matt Gunterman October 22nd, 2007

More bad coverage for Sen. Mitch McConnell in the conservative press.

From National Review Online:

Keeping a Place at the Trough
Senate Republicans are no earmark busters.

By David Freddoso

Considering how badly things are going for Republicans right now, they could use a few good issues. So when Democrats give them one through their incredible arrogance in spending taxpayers’ money — the same kind of arrogance that hastened the undoing of the Republican Congress last year — one would expect the GOP to take full advantage of such a gift.

[...]

Asked about the Senate GOP leadership’s role in the earmark debate, Coburn was charitable. “I’m trying to sell them on the idea that the only way to get our brand back is to start acting it,” he said. But the Republican leadership in the Senate has accumulated a disappointing mixed record. The Club for Growth castigated Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) in late September for watching majority Democrats pork-up four spending bills and then voting “for all of them without so much of a peep or whimper.” But this understates the case. McConnell has requested $391 million in earmarked funds for the next fiscal year, which is also an election year for him. That is more than twice the $180 million inserted by Murtha (D., Pa.), and $100 million more than the reputed King of Pork, Sen. Robert Byrd (D., W.Va.).

Few of McConnell’s requests are as egregious as those mentioned above — the easiest target is a $2 million horse manure research center at the University of Kentucky. According to the Louisville Courier-Journal, McConnell also earmarked three university projects in the last eight years that have been subsequently named after himself or his wife, Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao.

At a time when they could exploit a popular issue, Republicans instead continue to support egregious Democratic earmarks lest they lose their own pork. They are still working on the political model of the “District Mayors” theory pushed last cycle by House Speaker Dennis Hastert: By bringing home the bacon, members of Congress seek to extend their political lives indefinitely. A similar idea was employed in the re-election campaign of Sen. Conrad Burns (R., Mont.), who told Montanans repeatedly that with his seniority, he could continue to deliver federal projects for the state.

Burns is now a former senator, Hastert a former Speaker. Considering how well it worked for them in the election of 2006, Republicans might want to rethink their earmark strategy. Democrats are handing them the proverbial stick, but many Republicans are content using it to hit themselves across the face.

###